Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
OFFICIAL HARDCORE HUSKY PAC-10 POWER RANKINGS
Comments
-
Since when did USC fire sark?Mosster47 said:USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
-
Holy fuck, 7-1 conference record with a loss to San Jose State. That is Rich Brooks quality!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
1999 was the worst ever:Mosster47 said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.Mosster47 said:USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Stanford_Cardinal_football_team
This year isn't that bad.
Ty actually wasn't that awful at Stanford. Those Indiana Nazis/Catholics fucked him up badly.
-
Husky fans tend to remember Ty for 0-12 but the truth is his career suggests he is mediocre like Sark. With slightly more success.Mosster47 said:
Holy fuck, 7-1 conference record with a loss to San Jose State. That is Rich Brooks quality!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
1999 was the worst ever:Mosster47 said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.Mosster47 said:USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Stanford_Cardinal_football_team
This year isn't that bad.
Ty actually wasn't that awful at Stanford. Those Indiana Nazis/Catholics fucked him up badly. -
I'll never forget that. Air Farce kicked "our" ass (again) in Seattle. We still damn near won the conference. And Tytanic's Rose Bowl.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
1999 was the worst ever:Mosster47 said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.Mosster47 said:USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Stanford_Cardinal_football_team
This year isn't that bad. -
What happened to Nevada btw?
-
Sark is Ty. The USC job is the same as Ty at Notre Dame.allpurpleallgold said:
Husky fans tend to remember Ty for 0-12 but the truth is his career suggests he is mediocre like Sark. With slightly more success.Mosster47 said:
Holy fuck, 7-1 conference record with a loss to San Jose State. That is Rich Brooks quality!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
1999 was the worst ever:Mosster47 said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.Mosster47 said:USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Stanford_Cardinal_football_team
This year isn't that bad.
Ty actually wasn't that awful at Stanford. Those Indiana Nazis/Catholics fucked him up badly. -
Notre Dame is the epitome of PAC 12 dreckfest. Why isn't this PAC 12 member on the list?
-
haven't played enough games yet. Will be at the top come season's endoregonblitzkrieg said:Notre Dame is the epitome of PAC 12 dreckfest. Why isn't this PAC 12 member on the list?
-
Ty at Stanford was better than Sark at Washington.allpurpleallgold said:
Husky fans tend to remember Ty for 0-12 but the truth is his career suggests he is mediocre like Sark. With slightly more success.Mosster47 said:
Holy fuck, 7-1 conference record with a loss to San Jose State. That is Rich Brooks quality!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
1999 was the worst ever:Mosster47 said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.Mosster47 said:USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Stanford_Cardinal_football_team
This year isn't that bad.
Ty actually wasn't that awful at Stanford. Those Indiana Nazis/Catholics fucked him up badly.
