Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Do we all agree the PAC-12 sucks?

2

Comments

  • FreeChavez
    FreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223
    MarkKoopman said:

    Auburndawg said:

    And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?

    i think we can all agree that you have a simple mind, cannot handle the complexity of the ever-changing landscape of college ball and that you spend an inordinate amount of time speculating about where the mutts rank in terms of the Pac12 and nationally.

    Let me help you out. Parity has come to the Pac12........somewhat. There may not be any more dominating teams. Thing of the past.

    It is truly bizarre that you would think that a team like Cal beating the mutts means the Pac12 sucks. That Cal team is for real. Goff is most definitely for real. Get ready for him to pick apart your secondary saturday.



    MarkKoopman - 1
    Auburn - 0
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    MarkKoopman said:

    Auburndawg said:

    And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?

    i think we can all agree that you have a simple mind, cannot handle the complexity of the ever-changing landscape of college ball and that you spend an inordinate amount of time speculating about where the mutts rank in terms of the Pac12 and nationally.

    Let me help you out. Parity has come to the Pac12........somewhat. There may not be any more dominating teams. Thing of the past.

    It is truly bizarre that you would think that a team like Cal beating the mutts means the Pac12 sucks. That Cal team is for real. Goff is most definitely for real. Get ready for him to pick apart your secondary saturday.



    If this isn't a whooooooosh I'll light myself on fire and hug PDXatbat to death.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566
    MarkKoopman said:

    Auburndawg said:

    And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?

    i think we can all agree that you have a simple mind, cannot handle the complexity of the ever-changing landscape of college ball and that you spend an inordinate amount of time speculating about where the mutts rank in terms of the Pac12 and nationally.

    Let me help you out. Parity has come to the Pac12........somewhat. There may not be any more dominating teams. Thing of the past.

    It is truly bizarre that you would think that a team like Cal beating the mutts means the Pac12 sucks. That Cal team is for real. Goff is most definitely for real. Get ready for him to pick apart your secondary saturday.



    Ironic given your stance on the SEC. It's obvious that Mississippi St., Ole Miss, Alabama, Georgia, and Auburn are top 10 quality. Texas A&M is borderline, but Mississippi St. might just be that good. Oregon, Arizona, Stanford nor UCLA would be a top 5 team in the SEC this year. We might not have any Vandy's unless you count Colorado as part of the conference, but we have a crap load of B to C+ teams. I don't think depth of mediocrity equals quality with a conference. I still rank it higher than the Big10 and the ACC, but that isn't saying much.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,422 Founders Club
    MarkKoopman said:

    Auburndawg said:

    And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?

    i think we can all agree that you have a simple mind, cannot handle the complexity of the ever-changing landscape of college ball and that you spend an inordinate amount of time speculating about where the mutts rank in terms of the Pac12 and nationally.

    Let me help you out. Parity has come to the Pac12........somewhat. There may not be any more dominating teams. Thing of the past.

    It is truly bizarre that you would think that a team like Cal beating the mutts means the Pac12 sucks. That Cal team is for real. Goff is most definitely for real. Get ready for him to pick apart your secondary saturday.



    Cuogs pray for this on a nightly basis.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    Auburndawg said:

    If we lose to Cal things are seriously F'd up. Do we agree on that?

    The betting market says we are only 40% likely to beat Cal.

    So if this is your perspective...things are seriously F'd up regardless of whether we pull out the win. Unless we not only win but also look like a completely different team than we did the first five weeks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club
    The term fuckhole is really underutilized.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleReign
    PurpleReign Member Posts: 5,480
    Cal... is @#$%*!> $@^, (NTTIAWWT).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dnc said:

    Yes.

    No.

    /thread
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter