Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Do we all agree the PAC-12 sucks?
Auburndawg
Member Posts: 362
And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
Comments
-
No, but we all agree your weekly rankings/analysis sucks ass.
-
Yes.
No. -
Abuse.
-
The Pac-12 sucks. There is no reason to add anything else.
-
If we lose to Cal things are seriously F'd up. Do we agree on that?
-
Cal is one of the better teams in the conference. A loss to Cal could even be considered a quality loss as the PAC 12 stands now.Auburndawg said:If we lose to Cal things are seriously F'd up. Do we agree on that?
-
No
Pac 12 will be undefeated in bowl games. -
Auburndawg said:
And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
Thank you Dick Baird. -
PLSS's silence is telling.
-
i think we can all agree that you have a simple mind, cannot handle the complexity of the ever-changing landscape of college ball and that you spend an inordinate amount of time speculating about where the mutts rank in terms of the Pac12 and nationally.Auburndawg said:And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
Let me help you out. Parity has come to the Pac12........somewhat. There may not be any more dominating teams. Thing of the past.
It is truly bizarre that you would think that a team like Cal beating the mutts means the Pac12 sucks. That Cal team is for real. Goff is most definitely for real. Get ready for him to pick apart your secondary saturday.
-
MarkKoopman - 1MarkKoopman said:
i think we can all agree that you have a simple mind, cannot handle the complexity of the ever-changing landscape of college ball and that you spend an inordinate amount of time speculating about where the mutts rank in terms of the Pac12 and nationally.Auburndawg said:And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
Let me help you out. Parity has come to the Pac12........somewhat. There may not be any more dominating teams. Thing of the past.
It is truly bizarre that you would think that a team like Cal beating the mutts means the Pac12 sucks. That Cal team is for real. Goff is most definitely for real. Get ready for him to pick apart your secondary saturday.
Auburn - 0 -
If this isn't a whooooooosh I'll light myself on fire and hug PDXatbat to death.MarkKoopman said:
i think we can all agree that you have a simple mind, cannot handle the complexity of the ever-changing landscape of college ball and that you spend an inordinate amount of time speculating about where the mutts rank in terms of the Pac12 and nationally.Auburndawg said:And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
Let me help you out. Parity has come to the Pac12........somewhat. There may not be any more dominating teams. Thing of the past.
It is truly bizarre that you would think that a team like Cal beating the mutts means the Pac12 sucks. That Cal team is for real. Goff is most definitely for real. Get ready for him to pick apart your secondary saturday.
-
Its obvious you live for responses on a fucking message bored as the only hobby you have. You're 81% inaccurate everytime you open your fuckhole. Clean the dried semen out your squinted eyes, focus and read whats said about you. This thread is a perfect snapshot.Auburndawg said:And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
-
Ironic given your stance on the SEC. It's obvious that Mississippi St., Ole Miss, Alabama, Georgia, and Auburn are top 10 quality. Texas A&M is borderline, but Mississippi St. might just be that good. Oregon, Arizona, Stanford nor UCLA would be a top 5 team in the SEC this year. We might not have any Vandy's unless you count Colorado as part of the conference, but we have a crap load of B to C+ teams. I don't think depth of mediocrity equals quality with a conference. I still rank it higher than the Big10 and the ACC, but that isn't saying much.MarkKoopman said:
i think we can all agree that you have a simple mind, cannot handle the complexity of the ever-changing landscape of college ball and that you spend an inordinate amount of time speculating about where the mutts rank in terms of the Pac12 and nationally.Auburndawg said:And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
Let me help you out. Parity has come to the Pac12........somewhat. There may not be any more dominating teams. Thing of the past.
It is truly bizarre that you would think that a team like Cal beating the mutts means the Pac12 sucks. That Cal team is for real. Goff is most definitely for real. Get ready for him to pick apart your secondary saturday. -
Cuogs pray for this on a nightly basis.MarkKoopman said:
i think we can all agree that you have a simple mind, cannot handle the complexity of the ever-changing landscape of college ball and that you spend an inordinate amount of time speculating about where the mutts rank in terms of the Pac12 and nationally.Auburndawg said:And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
Let me help you out. Parity has come to the Pac12........somewhat. There may not be any more dominating teams. Thing of the past.
It is truly bizarre that you would think that a team like Cal beating the mutts means the Pac12 sucks. That Cal team is for real. Goff is most definitely for real. Get ready for him to pick apart your secondary saturday. -
This is the puppy steel we've been missing.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Its obvious you live for responses on a fucking message bored as the only hobby you have. You're 81% inaccurate everytime you open your fuckhole. Clean the dried semen out your squinted eyes, focus and read whats said about you. This thread is a perfect snapshot.Auburndawg said:And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
-
The betting market says we are only 40% likely to beat Cal.Auburndawg said:If we lose to Cal things are seriously F'd up. Do we agree on that?
So if this is your perspective...things are seriously F'd up regardless of whether we pull out the win. Unless we not only win but also look like a completely different team than we did the first five weeks. -
The term fuckhole is really underutilized.
-
-
/threaddnc said:Yes.
No. -
Cal beating Washington doesn't prove that the Pac-12 sucks.MarkKoopman said:
i think we can all agree that you have a simple mind, cannot handle the complexity of the ever-changing landscape of college ball and that you spend an inordinate amount of time speculating about where the mutts rank in terms of the Pac12 and nationally.Auburndawg said:And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
Let me help you out. Parity has come to the Pac12........somewhat. There may not be any more dominating teams. Thing of the past.
It is truly bizarre that you would think that a team like Cal beating the mutts means the Pac12 sucks. That Cal team is for real. Goff is most definitely for real. Get ready for him to pick apart your secondary saturday.
The Pac-12 sucking is what proves that the Pac-12 sucks. -
Really? Do you really think 5 SEC teams will end up in the top 10? Auburn plays Georgia and the rest play each other. There will be a couple teams with three or four losses in the Peach and Gaytor Bowels.greenblood said:
Ironic given your stance on the SEC. It's obvious that Mississippi St., Ole Miss, Alabama, Georgia, and Auburn are top 10 quality. Texas A&M is borderline, but Mississippi St. might just be that good. Oregon, Arizona, Stanford nor UCLA would be a top 5 team in the SEC this year. We might not have any Vandy's unless you count Colorado as part of the conference, but we have a crap load of B to C+ teams. I don't think depth of mediocrity equals quality with a conference. I still rank it higher than the Big10 and the ACC, but that isn't saying much.MarkKoopman said:
i think we can all agree that you have a simple mind, cannot handle the complexity of the ever-changing landscape of college ball and that you spend an inordinate amount of time speculating about where the mutts rank in terms of the Pac12 and nationally.Auburndawg said:And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
Let me help you out. Parity has come to the Pac12........somewhat. There may not be any more dominating teams. Thing of the past.
It is truly bizarre that you would think that a team like Cal beating the mutts means the Pac12 sucks. That Cal team is for real. Goff is most definitely for real. Get ready for him to pick apart your secondary saturday.
As for the PAC 12, It's one and one versus the top 10. There's no shame in that. -
Georgia, the team that lost to South Carolina is top 10? Auburn and Alabama (likely) are top 10 quality. LIPO with the rest of those teams. Only a true moron would say the Pac 12 is better, but let's not go ESPN with the dick sucking of the SEC.greenblood said:
Ironic given your stance on the SEC. It's obvious that Mississippi St., Ole Miss, Alabama, Georgia, and Auburn are top 10 quality. Texas A&M is borderline, but Mississippi St. might just be that good. Oregon, Arizona, Stanford nor UCLA would be a top 5 team in the SEC this year. We might not have any Vandy's unless you count Colorado as part of the conference, but we have a crap load of B to C+ teams. I don't think depth of mediocrity equals quality with a conference. I still rank it higher than the Big10 and the ACC, but that isn't saying much.MarkKoopman said:
i think we can all agree that you have a simple mind, cannot handle the complexity of the ever-changing landscape of college ball and that you spend an inordinate amount of time speculating about where the mutts rank in terms of the Pac12 and nationally.Auburndawg said:And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
Let me help you out. Parity has come to the Pac12........somewhat. There may not be any more dominating teams. Thing of the past.
It is truly bizarre that you would think that a team like Cal beating the mutts means the Pac12 sucks. That Cal team is for real. Goff is most definitely for real. Get ready for him to pick apart your secondary saturday. -
This was meant for plssgreenblood said:
Ironic given your stance on the SEC. It's obvious that Mississippi St., Ole Miss, Alabama, Georgia, and Auburn are top 10 quality. Texas A&M is borderline, but Mississippi St. might just be that good. Oregon, Arizona, Stanford nor UCLA would be a top 5 team in the SEC this year. We might not have any Vandy's unless you count Colorado as part of the conference, but we have a crap load of B to C+ teams. I don't think depth of mediocrity equals quality with a conference. I still rank it higher than the Big10 and the ACC, but that isn't saying much.MarkKoopman said:
i think we can all agree that you have a simple mind, cannot handle the complexity of the ever-changing landscape of college ball and that you spend an inordinate amount of time speculating about where the mutts rank in terms of the Pac12 and nationally.Auburndawg said:And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
Let me help you out. Parity has come to the Pac12........somewhat. There may not be any more dominating teams. Thing of the past.
It is truly bizarre that you would think that a team like Cal beating the mutts means the Pac12 sucks. That Cal team is for real. Goff is most definitely for real. Get ready for him to pick apart your secondary saturday. -
Aubbie has obviously never eaten bad beaver or gotten shit on his dick from a broad after a good poundin.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Its obvious you live for responses on a fucking message bored as the only hobby you have. You're 81% inaccurate everytime you open your fuckhole. Clean the dried semen out your squinted eyes, focus and read whats said about you. This thread is a perfect snapshot.Auburndawg said:And do we all agree that UW is more experienced, talented and athletic than everyone they still have to play, other than Oregon and UCLA?
