Looks like the opening lines have Cal favored by 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 points
Comments
-
I'm sure you have a better running game than Eastern, but I think their pass game probably executes on par with Cal. They don't have the same level of athletes, but they played one hell of a game in that phase of the game that day.FrankBear21 said:Just want to make a couple points here:
Saying we are one-dimensional is false. We have pretty good success running the football.
I don't know if Washington's defense is the best we faced this far. NU's is looking pretty good and they are off to a 2-0 start in the big-10.
Washington's D might be good, or is it just that stud Shaq making played? Either way, Washington has yet to face an above average offense to be fair.
Cal is at home this game. Pickem' game seems about right to me.
Vernon Adamss scares me more than Goff. Both are accurate and can drop dimes, but VA has wheels and heart. -
Doogin it up pretty good on this thread.HFNY said:I also love that we are one of the best in the nation at a turnover margin of +11 vs. Cal which is below average (at 0). Cal also gets more penalties per game than UW.
First the list of potential 1st or 2nd rounders (classic doogology) and now the turnover margin against UH,ewu,gsu and the illini.
lol
-
Below average at zero?HFNY said:I also love that we are one of the best in the nation at a turnover margin of +11 vs. Cal which is below average (at 0). Cal also gets more penalties per game than UW.
The fuck? -
He cuoged itTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Below average at zero?HFNY said:I also love that we are one of the best in the nation at a turnover margin of +11 vs. Cal which is below average (at 0). Cal also gets more penalties per game than UW.
The fuck?
-
+3 against Stanford.MarkKoopman said:
Doogin it up pretty good on this thread.HFNY said:I also love that we are one of the best in the nation at a turnover margin of +11 vs. Cal which is below average (at 0). Cal also gets more penalties per game than UW.
First the list of potential 1st or 2nd rounders (classic doogology) and now the turnover margin against UH,ewu,gsu and the illini.
lol
Good teams win with a +3 turnover margin.
-
You do realize that teams can have negative turnover margins don't you?
Check this out: ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/29TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Below average at zero?HFNY said:I also love that we are one of the best in the nation at a turnover margin of +11 vs. Cal which is below average (at 0). Cal also gets more penalties per game than UW.
The fuck? -
My delivery wasn't the best but I was trying to point out to the Cal fan that our front 7 is made up of more than just Shaq and that multiple guys will win All Pac-12 awards.
And in the 2nd week of the season after losing to Cal 31-24 at home, Northwestern promptly lost at home again to Northern Illinois 23-15 so trumpeting Northwestern isn't all that great.
Boobs does make a good point about forcing 3 turnovers and still losing to Stanford...even a blind man could see we were not a good team on offense that day. But if we get Cal to turn the ball over 3 times, I can't see us not winning.MarkKoopman said:
Doogin it up pretty good on this thread.HFNY said:I also love that we are one of the best in the nation at a turnover margin of +11 vs. Cal which is below average (at 0). Cal also gets more penalties per game than UW.
First the list of potential 1st or 2nd rounders (classic doogology) and now the turnover margin against UH,ewu,gsu and the illini.
lol -
Our secondary is going to get butt fucked if our pass rush doesn't show up.
The boys up front need to rumble. -
Totally agree with that and I think bettors are buying too hard into Cal's OL and improved defense.PurpleReign said:
Our secondary is going to get butt fucked if our pass rush doesn't show up.
The boys up front need to rumble. -
@OssaiCanYouSee, true??!!?!?11?PurpleReign said:Our secondary is going to get butt fucked if our pass rush doesn't show up.
The boys up front need to rumble.
