PGOS seems to lack basic critical thinking skills.
because I don't suck off the SEC?
die in a traffic accident
No, because because you're a prideful little shit who lacks the common sense as to consider the arguments (based off factual evidence) that have been laid out before you by others who "get it" far more than you do. And if you can't think critically and see some of the reasoning that others are making, at least have the common sense to stop making fucktarded arguments and just say LIPO and shut the fuck up. Embarrassing.
PGOS seems to lack basic critical thinking skills.
because I don't suck off the SEC?
die in a traffic accident
No, because because you're a prideful little shit who lacks the common sense as to consider the arguments (based off factual evidence) that have been laid out before you by others who "get it" far more than you do. And if you can't think critically and see some of the reasoning that others are making, at least have the common sense to stop making fucktarded arguments and just say LIPO and shut the fuck up. Embarrassing.
PGOS seems to lack basic critical thinking skills.
because I don't suck off the SEC?
die in a traffic accident
No, because because you're a prideful little shit who lacks the common sense as to consider the arguments (based off factual evidence) that have been laid out before you by others who "get it" far more than you do. And if you can't think critically and see some of the reasoning that others are making, at least have the common sense to stop making fucktarded arguments and just say LIPO and shut the fuck up. Embarrassing.
lmfao, you seem perturbed
Thanks for proving my point.
you're not good at this.
You're lucky I waste my time pointing out your loser mindset at all.
I'm not a conference loyalist. I will never cheer for Oregon (at least I never plan to), and I'll only cheer for WSU when they play Oregon. I don't care about any SEC team other than Alabama, except that the conference's success seems to aggravate certain bored members' mental health issues, and that amuses me. Regardless, as much as many of you hate the SEC, a large part of why that conference has so much success is due to their conference-as-one mindset. The continuous pumping eachother up has been a large factor in why the conference is good and is perceived as good. It's a self-fullfilling prophecy.
And for those of you who actually think that the Pac12 is as good as the SEC right now, as a "man" once said, you need to get some perspective. Just watch the Georgia v "USC" game and explain to me how any P12 team has played at that level this season. And, that's the SEC lEast. The media isn't the only reason why everyone in the country will be watching a couple of SEC games down in Mississippi tomorrow.
Good perspective, but you are high if you think Stanford, UCLA, or a healthy Oregon can't beat South Carolina and Georgia. Arizona, ASU, UW, and USC could possibly beat them at home too. They are upper-middle teams in any big conference except the Big 10. South Carolina's defense sucks and Georgia has a QB that looks as bad as Cyler Miles and Mark Richt is still their coach.
I do find the SEC, SEC chant funny because it's so stupid. Who chants about a conference? I like the SEC and watch at least a game or two every Saturday, but the top to bottom depth is embellished by the media. You can hate the media hype and appreciate watching great football.
Mississippi State beats LSU and the story becomes about how strong the SEC is and how good Mississippi State is this year. Never mind that LSU doesn't have a QB and lost a RB and two WR's in the first three rounds of the NFL draft. Arizona beats Oregon and the story becomes Oregon sucks, which mostly true, but there is a difference in how they are spun. Same thing will happen if Ole Miss beats Alabama, who while good, doesn't look like Alabama of the past few years.
PGOS seems to lack basic critical thinking skills.
because I don't suck off the SEC?
die in a traffic accident
No, because because you're a prideful little shit who lacks the common sense as to consider the arguments (based off factual evidence) that have been laid out before you by others who "get it" far more than you do. And if you can't think critically and see some of the reasoning that others are making, at least have the common sense to stop making fucktarded arguments and just say LIPO and shut the fuck up. Embarrassing.
lmfao, you seem perturbed
Thanks for proving my point.
you're not good at this.
You're lucky I waste my time pointing out your loser mindset at all.
I'm not a conference loyalist. I will never cheer for Oregon (at least I never plan to), and I'll only cheer for WSU when they play Oregon. I don't care about any SEC team other than Alabama, except that the conference's success seems to aggravate certain bored members' mental health issues, and that amuses me. Regardless, as much as many of you hate the SEC, a large part of why that conference has so much success is due to their conference-as-one mindset. The continuous pumping eachother up has been a large factor in why the conference is good and is perceived as good. It's a self-fullfilling prophecy.
And for those of you who actually think that the Pac12 is as good as the SEC right now, as a "man" once said, you need to get some perspective. Just watch the Georgia v "USC" game and explain to me how any P12 team has played at that level this season. And, that's the SEC lEast. The media isn't the only reason why everyone in the country will be watching a couple of SEC games down in Mississippi tomorrow.
Good perspective, but you are high if you think Stanford, UCLA, or a healthy Oregon can't beat South Carolina and Georgia. Arizona, ASU, UW, and USC could possibly beat them at home too. They are upper-middle teams in any big conference except the Big 10. South Carolina's defense sucks and Georgia has a QB that looks as bad as Cyler Miles and Mark Richt is still their coach.
I do find the SEC, SEC chant funny because it's so stupid. Who chants about a conference? I like the SEC and watch at least a game or two every Saturday, but the top to bottom depth is embellished by the media. You can hate the media hype and appreciate watching great football.
Mississippi State beats LSU and the story becomes about how strong the SEC is and how good Mississippi State is this year. Never mind that LSU doesn't have a QB and lost a RB and two WR's in the first three rounds of the NFL draft. Arizona beats Oregon and the story becomes Oregon sucks, which mostly true, but there is a difference in how they are spun. Same thing will happen if Ole Miss beats Alabama, who while good, doesn't look like Alabama of the past few years.
"you're a fucking idiot because WSU lost to Nevada!11!!!!"
I'm not a conference loyalist. I will never cheer for Oregon (at least I never plan to), and I'll only cheer for WSU when they play Oregon. I don't care about any SEC team other than Alabama, except that the conference's success seems to aggravate certain bored members' mental health issues, and that amuses me. Regardless, as much as many of you hate the SEC, a large part of why that conference has so much success is due to their conference-as-one mindset. The continuous pumping eachother up has been a large factor in why the conference is good and is perceived as good. It's a self-fullfilling prophecy.
And for those of you who actually think that the Pac12 is as good as the SEC right now, as a "man" once said, you need to get some perspective. Just watch the Georgia v "USC" game and explain to me how any P12 team has played at that level this season. And, that's the SEC lEast. The media isn't the only reason why everyone in the country will be watching a couple of SEC games down in Mississippi tomorrow.
Good perspective, but you are high if you think Stanford, UCLA, or a healthy Oregon can't beat South Carolina and Georgia. Arizona, ASU, UW, and USC could possibly beat them at home too. They are upper-middle teams in any big conference except the Big 10. South Carolina's defense sucks and Georgia has a QB that looks as bad as Cyler Miles and Mark Richt is still their coach.
I do find the SEC, SEC chant funny because it's so stupid. Who chants about a conference? I like the SEC and watch at least a game or two every Saturday, but the top to bottom depth is embellished by the media. You can hate the media hype and appreciate watching great football.
Mississippi State beats LSU and the story becomes about how strong the SEC is and how good Mississippi State is this year. Never mind that LSU doesn't have a QB and lost a RB and two WR's in the first three rounds of the NFL draft. Arizona beats Oregon and the story becomes Oregon sucks, which mostly true, but there is a difference in how they are spun. Same thing will happen if Ole Miss beats Alabama, who while good, doesn't look like Alabama of the past few years.
"you're a fucking idiot because first place in the north WSU lost to Nevada!11!!!!"
I'm not a conference loyalist. I will never cheer for Oregon (at least I never plan to), and I'll only cheer for WSU when they play Oregon. I don't care about any SEC team other than Alabama, except that the conference's success seems to aggravate certain bored members' mental health issues, and that amuses me. Regardless, as much as many of you hate the SEC, a large part of why that conference has so much success is due to their conference-as-one mindset. The continuous pumping eachother up has been a large factor in why the conference is good and is perceived as good. It's a self-fullfilling prophecy.
And for those of you who actually think that the Pac12 is as good as the SEC right now, as a "man" once said, you need to get some perspective. Just watch the Georgia v "USC" game and explain to me how any P12 team has played at that level this season. And, that's the SEC lEast. The media isn't the only reason why everyone in the country will be watching a couple of SEC games down in Mississippi tomorrow.
Good perspective, but you are high if you think Stanford, UCLA, or a healthy Oregon can't beat South Carolina and Georgia. Arizona, ASU, UW, and USC could possibly beat them at home too. They are upper-middle teams in any big conference except the Big 10. South Carolina's defense sucks and Georgia has a QB that looks as bad as Cyler Miles and Mark Richt is still their coach.
I'm not saying that those Pac12 teams can't beat South Carolina or Georgia. I'm just saying that their play, on that day, looked better and more complete than anything I've seen in the Pac12 so far.
How does geographic location matter in regards to how tuff the game is? If it's a road game it's a road game. You think flying 2 extra hours is going to change that? Fucking stupid.
What you've done, because you got your asses whooped in the SEC doesn't play anyone argument, is moved the goal posts. First they didn't play anyone, proven wrong. Now all of the sudden they don't travel far enough. Because playing Florida State every single year is easy because it's in the same state.
Travel time, different time zones etc play a factor. Don't act like it doesn't. Also, there's a clear difference between LSU and Alabama playing neutral site games in places relatively close like Houston, Dallas, and Atlanta. It's not like they're going up to Columbus to play Ohio State. Those SEC teams basically have home field advantage.
Nobody moved any goalposts. Their out of conference schedule has been crap for a while. Now all the SEC apologists point out how other conferences do it too (now)! That's a recent phenomenon in the past 3 or 4 years. Since everyone is relatively equal now, why isn't everyone judged equally?
"Washingron State (dreck of the P12) is losing to MWC teams, the B1G, and barely beating D2."
Fixed that for you. See also Vandy. Or good ole Mizzou.
The P12 isn't horrible - just virtually indistinguishable (even) from top to bottom. The SEC is the best conference until their current sweet gig (schedule, etc) doesn't work any more.
Let just hope that the P12 doesn't get left out of the playoffs while the SEC gets two teams in.
We need a clear leader to emerge from the P12 and so far we got nothing. Zip. Nadda. The exact opposite of abundance.
Yeah, a clear leader would help. SC kind of helped in the 2000s.
The Pac-12 has a lot of parity. It looks like the only real bad team this year is Colorado. Teams 1-11 are all close. I feel like a fag rooting for other PAC 12 teams, but hopefully Furd beats Our Whore tomorrow. If teams from other "Power Five" win the next couple of titles, I think a lot of the SEC nonsense goes away. Then hopefully the schedules will be better we can just enjoy college football. Having one conference "dominate" isn't good in my opinion.
I'm not a conference loyalist. I will never cheer for Oregon (at least I never plan to), and I'll only cheer for WSU when they play Oregon. I don't care about any SEC team other than Alabama, except that the conference's success seems to aggravate certain bored members' mental health issues, and that amuses me. Regardless, as much as many of you hate the SEC, a large part of why that conference has so much success is due to their conference-as-one mindset. The continuous pumping eachother up has been a large factor in why the conference is good and is perceived as good. It's a self-fullfilling prophecy.
And for those of you who actually think that the Pac12 is as good as the SEC right now, as a "man" once said, you need to get some perspective. Just watch the Georgia v "USC" game and explain to me how any P12 team has played at that level this season. And, that's the SEC lEast. The media isn't the only reason why everyone in the country will be watching a couple of SEC games down in Mississippi tomorrow.
Good perspective, but you are high if you think Stanford, UCLA, or a healthy Oregon can't beat South Carolina and Georgia. Arizona, ASU, UW, and USC could possibly beat them at home too. They are upper-middle teams in any big conference except the Big 10. South Carolina's defense sucks and Georgia has a QB that looks as bad as Cyler Miles and Mark Richt is still their coach.
I do find the SEC, SEC chant funny because it's so stupid. Who chants about a conference? I like the SEC and watch at least a game or two every Saturday, but the top to bottom depth is embellished by the media. You can hate the media hype and appreciate watching great football.
Mississippi State beats LSU and the story becomes about how strong the SEC is and how good Mississippi State is this year. Never mind that LSU doesn't have a QB and lost a RB and two WR's in the first three rounds of the NFL draft. Arizona beats Oregon and the story becomes Oregon sucks, which mostly true, but there is a difference in how they are spun. Same thing will happen if Ole Miss beats Alabama, who while good, doesn't look like Alabama of the past few years.
Yeah, whenever a lower ranked SEC team wins, it's always, "Look how great the SEC is, it's so tough!" Most of the SEC apologists on ESPN like Herbstreit, Robert Smith, Jesse metro Palmer, That fag that went to Georgia (I forgot his name) and Chris Fowler always repeat this line.
Obviously there are some good teams, but please tell me how Mississippi is number 10 right now. Arizona isn't even ranked and they are five and zero. I'm not saying they should be number 10 when the rankings come out, but they'll probably be about 21st and if Ole Sissy loses to Bammer, they will be 13 or 14. Was Mississippi St. even ranked before they beat LSU?
So I guess by PostGameFIreMarshall's logic the Pac gains a huge advantage everytime BC or Virginia travel cross country to visit a Pac12 school, whereas the SEC doesn't get nearly the same home field advantage when it's just Oklahoma or Florida State traveling a much shorter distance to visit them.
Maybe the SEC is even better than we realized.
"Look, I work for the phone company. I've had a lot of experience with semantics, so don't try to lure me into some maze of circular logic."
you guys are so fucking in love with the sec. nothing im saying is irrational. it's the best conference, but not by THAT big of a margin
I agree with this statement.
I don't agree that it's harder to play at BC than at Florida State, I don't care how many miles you have to travel to do so.
You're missing the point. Of course FSU is a tougher game because they're better. You're comparing apples and oranges.
A better comparison is SEC team x plays at NC St vs. at Oregon State. They're both about equally as difficult in a purely fball sense. NC St. is just 250 miles from x. It requires way less travel, and no time zone change or maybe one.
Oregon State is 2400 miles away. It's two or three time zones away. They have to leave Thursday night, fly to PDX, and from the time they actually land in PDX, it takes two hours to get to the Albany Comfort Inn at ap proximately 1:15 a.m. Pacific time. It's a different climate, the people are different, and there's different food.
Those road trips are not the same.
Florida State is the one tough game SEC teams play annually. Okay Clemson/GT can be hard at times. So that's three out of at least 48 non conference games. Bammer played WV in a dome that's 100 miles away from campus
you guys are so fucking in love with the sec. nothing im saying is irrational. it's the best conference, but not by THAT big of a margin
I agree with this statement.
I don't agree that it's harder to play at BC than at Florida State, I don't care how many miles you have to travel to do so.
You're missing the point. Of course FSU is a tougher game because they're better. You're comparing apples and oranges.
A better comparison is SEC team x plays at NC St vs. at Oregon State. They're both about equally as difficult in a purely fball sense. NC St. is just 250 miles from x. It requires way less travel, and no time zone change or maybe one.
Oregon State is 2400 miles away. It's two or three time zones away. They have to leave Thursday night, fly to PDX, and from the time they actually land in PDX, it takes two hours to get to the Albany Comfort Inn at ap proximately 1:15 a.m. Pacific time. It's a different climate, the people are different, and there's different food.
Those road trips are not the same.
Florida State is the one tough game SEC teams play annually. Okay Clemson/GT can be hard at times. So that's three out of at least 48 non conference games. Bammer played WV in a dome that's 100 miles away from campus
Shut the fuck up. We have pointed out to you, using actual facts, that the SEC plays tough non conference games. But you keep repeating the same lines that have been proven wrong. Yes, they play division 2 schools. Like there's a difference between a d2 school and scheduling Illinois. They also play quality "A" opponents. They should probably be applauded for how tough their non conference schedule is considering how hard it is to schedule tough out of conference opponents when most of the tough teams come from their conference.
Get the fuck out of here with this FS argument that the SEC should handicap themselves, to make it more likely that they lose to inferior teams simply because of travel, just because there aren't enough teams on the west coast for the PAC-12 to not travel. That's the only reason the PAC travels, bruh. You think they're all noble and want to play Pat Hill Tuff schedules. Bullshit. They would do the exact same thing the SEC does if they could.
Comments
That being said college football is complete shit this year.
i'm not arguing that it is! CHRIST
Bama will need to get past the Cuogs air raid first, though...tuff matchup
I do find the SEC, SEC chant funny because it's so stupid. Who chants about a conference? I like the SEC and watch at least a game or two every Saturday, but the top to bottom depth is embellished by the media. You can hate the media hype and appreciate watching great football.
Mississippi State beats LSU and the story becomes about how strong the SEC is and how good Mississippi State is this year. Never mind that LSU doesn't have a QB and lost a RB and two WR's in the first three rounds of the NFL draft. Arizona beats Oregon and the story becomes Oregon sucks, which mostly true, but there is a difference in how they are spun. Same thing will happen if Ole Miss beats Alabama, who while good, doesn't look like Alabama of the past few years.
- dumbasses in this thread
Nobody moved any goalposts. Their out of conference schedule has been crap for a while. Now all the SEC apologists point out how other conferences do it too (now)! That's a recent phenomenon in the past 3 or 4 years. Since everyone is relatively equal now, why isn't everyone judged equally?
The Pac-12 has a lot of parity. It looks like the only real bad team this year is Colorado. Teams 1-11 are all close. I feel like a fag rooting for other PAC 12 teams, but hopefully Furd beats Our Whore tomorrow. If teams from other "Power Five" win the next couple of titles, I think a lot of the SEC nonsense goes away. Then hopefully the schedules will be better we can just enjoy college football. Having one conference "dominate" isn't good in my opinion.
Obviously there are some good teams, but please tell me how Mississippi is number 10 right now. Arizona isn't even ranked and they are five and zero. I'm not saying they should be number 10 when the rankings come out, but they'll probably be about 21st and if Ole Sissy loses to Bammer, they will be 13 or 14. Was Mississippi St. even ranked before they beat LSU?
Me and OBK run dis bitch.
A better comparison is SEC team x plays at NC St vs. at Oregon State. They're both about equally as difficult in a purely fball sense. NC St. is just 250 miles from x. It requires way less travel, and no time zone change or maybe one.
Oregon State is 2400 miles away. It's two or three time zones away. They have to leave Thursday night, fly to PDX, and from the time they actually land in PDX, it takes two hours to get to the Albany Comfort Inn at ap proximately 1:15 a.m. Pacific time. It's a different climate, the people are different, and there's different food.
Those road trips are not the same.
Florida State is the one tough game SEC teams play annually. Okay Clemson/GT can be hard at times. So that's three out of at least 48 non conference games. Bammer played WV in a dome that's 100 miles away from campus
Get the fuck out of here with this FS argument that the SEC should handicap themselves, to make it more likely that they lose to inferior teams simply because of travel, just because there aren't enough teams on the west coast for the PAC-12 to not travel. That's the only reason the PAC travels, bruh. You think they're all noble and want to play Pat Hill Tuff schedules. Bullshit. They would do the exact same thing the SEC does if they could.
In summery, die in a fire.