But, even back in the 80s, when I was much younger and better looking, (not really) plenty of girls would love to get drunk at the house, end up in bed with some guy, end up half naked, and then decide that maybe they didn't want to have sex. And I think I speak for all when I say, it takes a special type of guy who can just turn it off at that time. And by special, I mean gay.
But, even back in the 80s, when I was much younger and better looking, (not really) plenty of girls would love to get drunk at the house, end up in bed with some guy, end up half naked, and then decide that maybe they didn't want to have sex. And I think I speak for all when I say, it takes a special type of guy who can just turn it off at that time. And by special, I mean gay.
It's a web based survey. Hard to take that seriously.
It's very broad in its definition of rape. It asks if consent was given but nothing about the use of force.
49% of all survey takers report being involved in at least one sexual encounter without their consent. Which leads us to the consent problem and how people have defined that word into nothing. If half of your subjects report having been involved in a "rape" or attempted "rape" then there's no point in taking it seriously.
I found the number of unreported rape cases in broader studies to be around 50%. This study comes in at 90%. The reason why is because they define rape so lightly. You know who is less likely to report a rape than a rape victim? Someone that hasn't been raped.
It's a web based survey. Hard to take that seriously.
It's very broad in its definition of rape. It asks if consent was given but nothing about the use of force.
49% of all survey takers report being involved in at least one sexual encounter without their consent. Which leads us to the consent problem and how people have defined that word into nothing. If half of your subjects report having been involved in a "rape" or attempted "rape" then there's no point in taking it seriously.
I found the number of unreported rape cases in broader studies to be around 50%. This study comes in at 90%. The reason why is because they define rape so lightly. You know who is less likely to report a rape than a rape victim? Someone that hasn't been raped.
But, even back in the 80s, when I was much younger and better looking, (not really) plenty of girls would love to get drunk at the house, end up in bed with some guy, end up half naked, and then decide that maybe they didn't want to have sex. And I think I speak for all when I say, it takes a special type of guy who can just turn it off at that time. And by special, I mean gay.
Comments
hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/13208/you-guys-still-need-more-time-to-get-your-own-rapists-in-there
But, even back in the 80s, when I was much younger and better looking, (not really) plenty of girls would love to get drunk at the house, end up in bed with some guy, end up half naked, and then decide that maybe they didn't want to have sex. And I think I speak for all when I say, it takes a special type of guy who can just turn it off at that time. And by special, I mean gay.
It's very broad in its definition of rape. It asks if consent was given but nothing about the use of force.
49% of all survey takers report being involved in at least one sexual encounter without their consent. Which leads us to the consent problem and how people have defined that word into nothing. If half of your subjects report having been involved in a "rape" or attempted "rape" then there's no point in taking it seriously.
I found the number of unreported rape cases in broader studies to be around 50%. This study comes in at 90%. The reason why is because they define rape so lightly. You know who is less likely to report a rape than a rape victim? Someone that hasn't been raped.