Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Some things take time for a new coach to implement

2»

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,875 Swaye's Wigwam

    ND 34, Stanford 17


    Rather easily.

    All the screenshots I need
    I was hoping someone would take one.
    Goldson gets injured in 1st quarter, Furd wins a TUFF one 13-10

    cook it!

    *insert spastic killer clown .gif*
    I agree because you "cooked it"
    image
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    Gladstone said:

    Some things, however, absolutely do not. The most damning aspect of the Stanford game, for me, was the inept special teams play. That is something that a competent coach should be able to fix right away. Kickoff coverage 101. Not fumbling a basic PAT. Both of these fall 100% at the feet of the coaching staff and were directly attributable to our loss. Inexcusable.

    Secondly, the regression of players. Namely Cyler Miles. I went back and watched last year's UCLA and Oregon State games. That Cyler was worlds ahead of the dreckfest we saw on Saturday. I understand Miles was out for the spring, but he has no business looking that terrible. I suspect ND is going to obliterate this Stanford team next week, making us look even worse.

    On point 2, would you say he's blowing things up? Did you expect Petermon to just put his stamp on things and continue things the way they were under Sark? Do you feel duped?

    Miles looks way worse no doubt, and to an extent Petersen needs to find a way to play to his QBs strength. Sark trying to make Jake a pocket passer lost us a few games. Fuck maybe you're right, but I thought we were all into Peterman doing whatever he wanted because 95-13.

    I going to get a drink
    I think this is true. Play to Miles' strengths and don't try to force him into being something he's not. I think there were one or two called runs or plays where Miles kept the ball. The time I remember him keeping it, he gained 10 yards and picked up a first down. I don't like to complain about play calling too much, but it would have been nice to see some QB runs and fly sweeps called in the run game.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,875 Swaye's Wigwam

    Gladstone said:

    Some things, however, absolutely do not. The most damning aspect of the Stanford game, for me, was the inept special teams play. That is something that a competent coach should be able to fix right away. Kickoff coverage 101. Not fumbling a basic PAT. Both of these fall 100% at the feet of the coaching staff and were directly attributable to our loss. Inexcusable.

    Secondly, the regression of players. Namely Cyler Miles. I went back and watched last year's UCLA and Oregon State games. That Cyler was worlds ahead of the dreckfest we saw on Saturday. I understand Miles was out for the spring, but he has no business looking that terrible. I suspect ND is going to obliterate this Stanford team next week, making us look even worse.

    On point 2, would you say he's blowing things up? Did you expect Petermon to just put his stamp on things and continue things the way they were under Sark? Do you feel duped?

    Miles looks way worse no doubt, and to an extent Petersen needs to find a way to play to his QBs strength. Sark trying to make Jake a pocket passer lost us a few games. Fuck maybe you're right, but I thought we were all into Peterman doing whatever he wanted because 95-13.

    I going to get a drink
    I think this is true. Play to Miles' strengths and don't try to force him into being something he's not. I think there were one or two called runs or plays where Miles kept the ball. The time I remember him keeping it, he gained 10 yards and picked up a first down. I don't like to complain about play calling too much, but it would have been nice to see some QB runs and fly sweeps called in the run game.
    Miles picked up 2 first downs on runs in the 4th quarter. When he didn't run sideways, he picked up positive yardage

    I really don't know what the fuck Petahman and Smoth are thinking. Run Cyler 15 times a game...there are fucking THREE 4 star recruits that are tanned, rested, and ready in case Miley pulls a hammy.

    It's fucking pissing me off.
  • uziuzi Member Posts: 1,298

    ND 34, Stanford 17


    Rather easily.

    I see you are going for 0-2 on your predictions involving Stanford.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    uzi said:

    ND 34, Stanford 17


    Rather easily.

    I see you are going for 0-2 on your predictions involving Stanford.
    0-3. I thought they would beat SC.
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,983 Founders Club

    ND 34, Stanford 17


    Rather easily.

    If you're betting, I take it, you're betting with a Sven $20
    I was thinking 1000 Weiser bucks.
    Whoa, big spender!
Sign In or Register to comment.