Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Not taking the ball at the 35, and having stanford re-kick. Brilliant.

2»

Comments

  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    I don't think it is a seperate issue. The logic of he's our best player doesn't make sense when you make no effort to get him the ball on offense.

    I agree that Stanfords D and Miley's play made it difficult. But you have to find a way. Get him on a reverse. Run a sweep for him. 3 offensive touches isn't enough. There are ways to get him the ball if you try. They didn't try.
  • MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031
    chuck said:

    I was all for taking a rekick. There wasn't a single reason on earth to believe the uw offense was going to go 65 yards. Give your only threat a chance to work.

    Fake punt though...not so much.

    that's exactly how I feel. I had zero faith the o-line could hold and that Miles could make any good reads and positive decisions and it's simply a calculated gamble that Ross is special enough that you kinda go for it.

    Then again, Syracuse fake punt was sweet.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,502 Swaye's Wigwam
    Meek said:

    chuck said:

    I was all for taking a rekick. There wasn't a single reason on earth to believe the uw offense was going to go 65 yards. Give your only threat a chance to work.

    Fake punt though...not so much.

    that's exactly how I feel. I had zero faith the o-line could hold and that Miles could make any good reads and positive decisions and it's simply a calculated gamble that Ross is special enough that you kinda go for it.

    Then again, Syracuse fake punt was sweet.
    Fake punts are always sweet when they work, and stupid when they don't.

    Fuck me that sounds like something a doogman fuck would say. Lighting myself on fire now.
  • HouhuskyHouhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    chuck said:

    Meek said:

    chuck said:

    I was all for taking a rekick. There wasn't a single reason on earth to believe the uw offense was going to go 65 yards. Give your only threat a chance to work.

    Fake punt though...not so much.

    that's exactly how I feel. I had zero faith the o-line could hold and that Miles could make any good reads and positive decisions and it's simply a calculated gamble that Ross is special enough that you kinda go for it.

    Then again, Syracuse fake punt was sweet.
    Fake punts are always sweet when they work, and stupid when they don't.

    Fuck me that sounds like something a doogman RaceBannon fuck would say. Lighting myself on fire now.
    FTFY
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,416 Founders Club
    I've forgot more about football than any of you fucks know
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Houhusky said:

    I've forgot more about football than any of you fucks know

    Its showing.

    BOOM. ROSTED. #Fremont
    FREE PUB!!1!!11!!!!11!!!!!!1!!11!!1!!1!!!!11

    Yeah, boi!
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited September 2014

    There really shouldn't be any debate about this. They have to kick it to your best player and biggest threat. Meanwhile, your offense has only scored 1 TD all game. And you gain an extra 5 yards. The odds are very low that you don't return it to close to the 30. Just happened to have a shit return. Big fucking deal. That loss of 19 yards had very little impact on the game. Still had a chance to tie the game with the ball on Stanfords 30, 1st down with a min left.

    I didn't agree with the 4th down call but these are the risks you take to beat a better team because the percentages (and risk/reward of the situation) warrant taking these risks. Now if the game were tied, then you'd take the field position. Down 7 with offense not doing anything, you give Ross another crack.

    There is one giant flaw with your point. You want to make them kick it to your best player...but you make no effort to get him the ball yourself all game? If that's the logic, if Ross is worth the risk, then why not get him the ball more?
    Because he was covered, the o line sucks, and Miles can't through under pressure or even into a little bit of coverage. The had to bring in Lindquist to try to get it to Ross deep. Miles can't throw it that far.
  • EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,659 Swaye's Wigwam

    There really shouldn't be any debate about this. They have to kick it to your best player and biggest threat. Meanwhile, your offense has only scored 1 TD all game. And you gain an extra 5 yards. The odds are very low that you don't return it to close to the 30. Just happened to have a shit return. Big fucking deal. That loss of 19 yards had very little impact on the game. Still had a chance to tie the game with the ball on Stanfords 30, 1st down with a min left.

    I didn't agree with the 4th down call but these are the risks you take to beat a better team because the percentages (and risk/reward of the situation) warrant taking these risks. Now if the game were tied, then you'd take the field position. Down 7 with offense not doing anything, you give Ross another crack.

    There is one giant flaw with your point. You want to make them kick it to your best player...but you make no effort to get him the ball yourself all game? If that's the logic, if Ross is worth the risk, then why not get him the ball more?
    Because he was covered, the o line sucks, and Miles can't through under pressure or even into
    A little bit of coverage.
    Suckbundance
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    edited September 2014

    There really shouldn't be any debate about this. They have to kick it to your best player and biggest threat. Meanwhile, your offense has only scored 1 TD all game. And you gain an extra 5 yards. The odds are very low that you don't return it to close to the 30. Just happened to have a shit return. Big fucking deal. That loss of 19 yards had very little impact on the game. Still had a chance to tie the game with the ball on Stanfords 30, 1st down with a min left.

    I didn't agree with the 4th down call but these are the risks you take to beat a better team because the percentages (and risk/reward of the situation) warrant taking these risks. Now if the game were tied, then you'd take the field position. Down 7 with offense not doing anything, you give Ross another crack.

    There is one giant flaw with your point. You want to make them kick it to your best player...but you make no effort to get him the ball yourself all game? If that's the logic, if Ross is worth the risk, then why not get him the ball more?
    Because he was covered, the o line sucks, and Miles can't through under pressure or even into a little bit of coverage. The had to bring in Lindquist to try to get it to Ross deep. Miles can't throw it that far.
    There's more than one way to get Ross the ball.
Sign In or Register to comment.