An Open Letter to Scott Eklund
Comments
-
Sounds like you guys need a time out.CuntWaffle said:
Call me all the names you want but if you are just going to make stuff up... well... you're just makign stuff up.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I'm hearing you need more time.CuntWaffle said:Cuntwaffle was the only reason I started poasting here with all you classy poasters.
The moment I read that I knew it was time (aka I wasn't young anymore). -
Hi Harv!DerekJohnson said:
Sounds like you guys need a time out.CuntWaffle said:
Call me all the names you want but if you are just going to make stuff up... well... you're just makign stuff up.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I'm hearing you need more time.CuntWaffle said:Cuntwaffle was the only reason I started poasting here with all you classy poasters.
The moment I read that I knew it was time (aka I wasn't young anymore). -
Reading these re-hashes of dramas that some of you girls had at Doogman is pretty tiresome really.
I agree with the advice: just stop paying, and better yet, stop going. I cut my paid subscription there in 2003 and never regretted it. I also feel I have a better grasp of recruiting without all of their misinformation. The facts are out there. I don't need to pay those people to tell me the facts.
But far too many threads here remind me of threads I used to read at Doogman about Ruth. Gads. A bunch of girls with twists in their panties....
-
LEAVE!Global said:Reading these re-hashes of dramas that some of you girls had at Doogman is pretty tiresome really.
I agree with the advice: just stop paying, and better yet, stop going. I cut my paid subscription there in 2003 and never regretted it. I also feel I have a better grasp of recruiting without all of their misinformation. The facts are out there. I don't need to pay those people to tell me the facts.
But far too many threads here remind me of threads I used to read at Doogman about Ruth. Gads. A bunch of girls with twists in their panties.... -
Well articulated!


