Phil Steele predicted a team that was ineligible for a bowl in 2012 (Central Florida) to reach a BCS Bowl game last summer. His opinion is ridiculously overrated.
So, you're saying the Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl isn't special? What are you some kind of sicko hunger advocate? If you can't see that helping fight hunger is way, way more noble than the money grabbing BCS Bowl system, soon to be playoff format, you clearly have no soul.
Phil Steele predicted a team that was ineligible for a bowl in 2012 (Central Florida) to reach a BCS Bowl game last summer. His opinion is ridiculously overrated.
That's just what he was hearing, not a prediction. Some of you need to learn the difference.
As a fellow banana connoisseur once told me (over and over), "You guys have no idea what kind of mess the program was in when Sark got here. These things take time and if you can't handle that then maybe college football isn't for you. Wait, what did you say about Harbaugh at Stanford? Oh, that's totally different. Anyone who's an asshole can win right away. For a nice, all around good guy like Sark, it takes time. Mora? Oh please. Anyone can win at UCLA, and besides I'm hearing from my secret behind-the-lines source at UCLA that he's making enemies over there."
As a fellow banana connoisseur once told me (over and over), "You guys have no idea what kind of mess the program was in when Sark got here. These things take time and if you can't handle that then maybe college football isn't for you. Wait, what did you say about Harbaugh at Stanford? Oh, that's totally different. Anyone who's an asshole can win right away. For a nice, all around good guy like Sark, it takes time. Mora? Oh please. Anyone can win at UCLA, and besides I'm hearing from my secret behind-the-lines source at UCLA that he's making enemies over there."
If this program was such a mess then how did he go 4-5 in conference the first year and 5-7? With three losses coming at the very end of the game. Then in his second year he wins 7. Does that sound like a fucking mess? This is the biggest lie about Sark & UW and the evidence is right there!
As a fellow banana connoisseur once told me (over and over), "You guys have no idea what kind of mess the program was in when Sark got here. These things take time and if you can't handle that then maybe college football isn't for you. Wait, what did you say about Harbaugh at Stanford? Oh, that's totally different. Anyone who's an asshole can win right away. For a nice, all around good guy like Sark, it takes time. Mora? Oh please. Anyone can win at UCLA, and besides I'm hearing from my secret behind-the-lines source at UCLA that he's making enemies over there."
If this program was such a mess then how did he go 4-5 in conference the first year and 5-7? With three losses coming at the very end of the game. Then in his second year he wins 7. Does that sound like a fucking mess? This is the biggest lie about Sark & UW and the evidence is right there!
it makes complete sense to me, we stay the same 7-5, and the rest of the conference gets better, which it should. Then when we beat hapless navy in the bowl it'll be considered progress
Comments
http://www.kraftbowl.org/about-us/embl-board.html