Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

USC fans already calling Seven "Snark"

2»

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,156 Founders Club
    That's the second half of the awesomeness of last December. Haden taking Sark was unbelievable but Pool Boy hiring Petermen is what made it work. I was convinced we'd get some schlub Sark 2.0 guy myself.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    Gladstone said:

    I was one of the dudes championing DeRuyter as a Sark replacement last year. I feel like a jackass now.

    LEAVE!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Why would we want USC to fire Sark?! The last time SC fired a shitty OC turned head coach, they ass fucked the CFB world for the next decade. I'm comfortable with where they're at.

    Disagree. They fired Kiffin to hire Sark.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    ORdawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    USC AD Pat Haden has announced that Coach Sark will feed assistant Johnny Nansen to a pack of Bruins following an early December practice, in anticipation of the "Battle for Los Angeles".

    "Cool experience for our young men of Troy," commented a fatigued Sarkisian.

    Won't happen. Sark will protect his wingman 'till the end.
    at this point, do you really think he has a choice?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • priapism
    priapism Member Posts: 2,306
    DeRuyter will prob still finish 7-2 with this MWC schedule. If he gets to 8 wins, he'll still be a decent HC prospect for the last-moment-type-of-hire for a 2nd tier large conference school, such as Iowa etc.

    http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/teams/ffe/schedule/
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    priapism said:

    DeRuyter will prob still finish 7-2 with this MWC schedule. If he gets to 8 wins, he'll still be a decent HC prospect for the last-moment-type-of-hire for a 2nd tier large conference school, such as Iowa etc.

    http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/teams/ffe/schedule/

    Kirk Ferentz has a lifetime CONTRACT.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RoadDawg55 said:

    priapism said:



    As soon as the "seven" fans started turning on him in larger and larger numbers last year, I knew he was going to try to bail as soon as Kiffin got fired.

    Fleenor? I don't think many besides a few bozos on dawgman were surprised that he left. The surprise was that USC was actually dumb enough to hire him. Last Thanksgiving, I had a dumbass Cuog cousin who was trying to talk shit to me that UW was going to lose their coach. I laughed and told him that I wish that was true, but there was no way USC would be dumb enough to hire Sark.
    It wasn't about losing Sark, to me it was about his replacement. I would rather have Sark than another assistant using UW as a stepping stone, for instance. I didn't trust UW to actually make a big hire.

    I did joke with a couple buddies after kitten was fired that Sark would go to USC and Peterson would finally leave and come to UW. Really the best scenario ever.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    2001400ex said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    priapism said:



    As soon as the "seven" fans started turning on him in larger and larger numbers last year, I knew he was going to try to bail as soon as Kiffin got fired.

    Fleenor? I don't think many besides a few bozos on dawgman were surprised that he left. The surprise was that USC was actually dumb enough to hire him. Last Thanksgiving, I had a dumbass Cuog cousin who was trying to talk shit to me that UW was going to lose their coach. I laughed and told him that I wish that was true, but there was no way USC would be dumb enough to hire Sark.
    It wasn't about losing Sark, to me it was about his replacement. I would rather have Sark than another assistant using UW as a stepping stone, for instance. I didn't trust UW to actually make a big hire.

    I did joke with a couple buddies after kitten was fired that Sark would go to USC and Peterson would finally leave and come to UW. Really the best scenario ever.
    Could not disagree more. As APAG empirically demonstrated, hire an assistant is not necessarily a faulty method. But once you know you don't have a great coach you move on quickly until you find one. We had known for years Sark wasn't a great coach. I'd have been disappointed with another bullshit assistant hire, but I still would have preferred that to keeping Sark. The only thing that would have been worse than keeping Sark would have been hiring a failed college coach, ala Gilbyham.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    Gladstone said:

    I was one of the dudes championing DeRuyter as a Sark replacement last year. I feel like a jackass now.

    Great self awareness, as always.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Why would we want USC to fire Sark?! The last time SC fired a shitty OC turned head coach, they ass fucked the CFB world for the next decade. I'm comfortable with where they're at.

    Disagree. They fired Kiffin to hire Sark.
    Paul Hackett wants to know why you forgot about him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter