Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Spin this

2»

Comments

  • Rancid
    Rancid Member Posts: 75
    TMacDawg said:

    Didn't they pole any wide receivers?

    gay
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tailgater
    Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    Looks like paying that Lyle guy to find and recruit future ducks prevented Nike U. from landing top five recruiting classes every year. Either that or the 2000 prep footballers surveyed weren't and still aren't on anybody's list of top no-star recruits.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mooser42
    Mooser42 Member Posts: 763
    section8 said:

    I was a little surprised that Oregon was ahead of Alabama, apparently flashy uniforms>winning title games

    These fucking kids dont understand that what happened 23 years ago is important.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IrishDawg22
    IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    I called 10 kids and they said that survey is stupid.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    Ask Eklund. A straight shooter.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • section8
    section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    That article never hit DM, either that or it just went poof
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    that's what winning does for a school. 4 BCS appearances in a row makes a difference. NOBODY is watching a bowl game on Dec 30th. Oregon is so freaken far ahead of UW its sickening. Hard to catch up to a school that got a 10-year head start, with money, support from EVERYONE top-to-bottom, and killer facilities and uniforms

    Too late! Sark is doing the right thing and with great effort. But pissing wins away and COMPLETELY ditching the only part of your offense that got your team to the red zone (the running game), TIME AND TIME AGAIN, is inexplicable. That's been the difference between 9-4 and 7-6. You also HAVE to win road games. Sarks squad did that, or looked better doing it, in 2009 (with Ty's recruits). With his recruits, his teams are d-2 quality on the road. Time to step up and beat teams on the road like Oregon does
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    that's what winning does for a school. 4 BCS appearances in a row makes a difference. NOBODY is watching a bowl game on Dec 30th. Oregon is so freaken far ahead of UW its sickening. Hard to catch up to a school that got a 10-year head start, with money, support from EVERYONE top-to-bottom, and killer facilities and uniforms

    Oregon managed to do it...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tailgater
    Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    Mad_Son said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    that's what winning does for a school. 4 BCS appearances in a row makes a difference. NOBODY is watching a bowl game on Dec 30th. Oregon is so freaken far ahead of UW its sickening. Hard to catch up to a school that got a 10-year head start, with money, support from EVERYONE top-to-bottom, and killer facilities and uniforms

    Oregon managed to do it...
    You realize that UW athletics had the money and support from everyone that counts, but the money collected from us under deceptions, lies, and false promises by those no-accounts who hate Husky Football was spent elsewhere. I understand that looking back over the past 20 years is unpopular amongst the young and considered the province of old people who lived and suffered through it, but Oregon did not by any measure get a 10-year head start.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778
    2000 players is an awfully small sample size.

    Oh wait, we didn't receive ANY votes? Okay....that is statistically significant.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter