Spin this
Comments
-
Thankfully we have great recruiters in Sark and Tosh who can make the kids realize that UW is where they really want to go
#StToshsDayMassacre2014 -
We only want kids who REALLY WANT to be Dawgs!
(Even if there are only 3 of them.) -
That pole has an against extreme northwest coast schools, mainly Juneau CC and UW.
-
Nice list of flash in the pan schools
-
Mad_Son said:
Thankfully we have great recruiters in Sark and Tosh who can make the kids realize that UW is where they really want to go
#StToshsDayMassacre2012...2013...2014
-
How is Cal tied for 8th? Who would want to play football there if they could go anywhere?
-
Spin: WDWHA
As for Cal, it's either the love of the Telegraph hippies, the surveyed 2,000 football players are in the state of CA where that org is based or the CEO wanted the school he played for to be high in the rankings. -
Didn't they pole any wide receivers?
-
I was a little surprised that Oregon was ahead of Alabama, apparently flashy uniforms>winning title games
-
Considering Bama kicks Oregon's ass in recruiting every year, I'd say the results of this pole are "unscientific".section8 said:I was a little surprised that Oregon was ahead of Alabama, apparently flashy uniforms>winning title games
-
gayTMacDawg said:Didn't they pole any wide receivers?
-
Looks like paying that Lyle guy to find and recruit future ducks prevented Nike U. from landing top five recruiting classes every year. Either that or the 2000 prep footballers surveyed weren't and still aren't on anybody's list of top no-star recruits.
-
These fucking kids dont understand that what happened 23 years ago is important.section8 said:I was a little surprised that Oregon was ahead of Alabama, apparently flashy uniforms>winning title games
-
I called 10 kids and they said that survey is stupid.
-
Ask Eklund. A straight shooter.
-
That article never hit DM, either that or it just went poof
-
that's what winning does for a school. 4 BCS appearances in a row makes a difference. NOBODY is watching a bowl game on Dec 30th. Oregon is so freaken far ahead of UW its sickening. Hard to catch up to a school that got a 10-year head start, with money, support from EVERYONE top-to-bottom, and killer facilities and uniforms
Too late! Sark is doing the right thing and with great effort. But pissing wins away and COMPLETELY ditching the only part of your offense that got your team to the red zone (the running game), TIME AND TIME AGAIN, is inexplicable. That's been the difference between 9-4 and 7-6. You also HAVE to win road games. Sarks squad did that, or looked better doing it, in 2009 (with Ty's recruits). With his recruits, his teams are d-2 quality on the road. Time to step up and beat teams on the road like Oregon does -
Oregon managed to do it...puppylove_sugarsteel said:that's what winning does for a school. 4 BCS appearances in a row makes a difference. NOBODY is watching a bowl game on Dec 30th. Oregon is so freaken far ahead of UW its sickening. Hard to catch up to a school that got a 10-year head start, with money, support from EVERYONE top-to-bottom, and killer facilities and uniforms
-
You realize that UW athletics had the money and support from everyone that counts, but the money collected from us under deceptions, lies, and false promises by those no-accounts who hate Husky Football was spent elsewhere. I understand that looking back over the past 20 years is unpopular amongst the young and considered the province of old people who lived and suffered through it, but Oregon did not by any measure get a 10-year head start.Mad_Son said:
Oregon managed to do it...puppylove_sugarsteel said:that's what winning does for a school. 4 BCS appearances in a row makes a difference. NOBODY is watching a bowl game on Dec 30th. Oregon is so freaken far ahead of UW its sickening. Hard to catch up to a school that got a 10-year head start, with money, support from EVERYONE top-to-bottom, and killer facilities and uniforms
-
2000 players is an awfully small sample size.
Oh wait, we didn't receive ANY votes? Okay....that is statistically significant.