Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
food for thought...
Comments
-
wnd.com is your source? They use John Fucking Rocker as a contributor. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.MikeDamone said:
How many logical fallacies can the glove commit in one thread? The o/u is 5TheGlove said:
fixerated.RaceBannon said:
I didn't like the article you linkedTheGlove said:
I don't really need your help, thanks. But this might help you out, the bumper-sticker analogy is threaded throughout the article as an illustration of the main point. In other words, her opinion about mopeds, cars, guns, or cigarettes (was it the mention of "dangerous guns" that threw you into a tailspin?) doesn't make a bit of difference.CuntWaffle said:
If you can't see how hypocritical that paragraph is then I can't help you.TheGlove said:
It's tough when the article takes longer to read than you can actually focus on something.CuntWaffle said:"Are mopeds dangerous? Sure, if by dangerous you mean significantly riskier than cars but slightly less direful than motorcycles. They are not dangerous compared to smoking a lot of cigarettes or owning a gun. The point is that, while nothing about the bumper sticker backed up its ominous claim, I automatically accepted it."
Stopped reading after that.
Do you have ADD?was a bumper stickerbecause it made conservatives look bad.
HTH
He links an article and goes ape shit. Christ.
You doing exactly what the article says unthinking Fucktards do. .which is classic confirmation bias. You may have proven this right by your own example.
I can do it too.
PROVE THIS WRONG POINT BY POINT!
wnd.com/2010/03/127614/
But seriously, the Elmore article does point out that email/internet are used to spread misinformation more easily. Agreed. Then he just goes on to bash anyone he can find with no scientific evidence. Richwine too, offers no different scientific results just tries (valiantly) to pick away at a couple of unrelated studies.
Did you get your Watch Word Bible yet? God's word comes to life on DVD. -
I'm sure CuntWaffle loves that you are here to back him up, but he can't get past the bumper sticker analogy so he's really not worth defending here.MikeDamone said:
Have you always pressed like this or did I just not really pay that close attention to you before?TheGlove said:
Do you want a cookie?CuntWaffle said:I saw a bumper sticker that said rock climbing is dangerous but didn't have anything to back up that claim. Rock climbing isn't as dangerous as say sharks or cancer.
-
I get it. We read something and take it at face value because that's how our brain cognitively works. How is her claiming guns and cigarettes are more dangerous than mopeds any different than the bumper sticker though? She says something (ridiculous comparison) and then doesn't back it up, aka a bumper sticker.TheGlove said:
I'm sure CuntWaffle loves that you are here to back him up, but he can't get past the bumper sticker analogy so he's really not worth defending here.MikeDamone said:
Have you always pressed like this or did I just not really pay that close attention to you before?TheGlove said:
Do you want a cookie?CuntWaffle said:I saw a bumper sticker that said rock climbing is dangerous but didn't have anything to back up that claim. Rock climbing isn't as dangerous as say sharks or cancer.
HTH. -
What we should be talking about is how ugly that woman is. Jesus. Guarantee you if she isn't a split licker, she will marry some half fag metrosexual type and shit out a couple more peace love and trail mix losers that will also crusade against conservatives. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Meanwhile, I'm going shooting. Fuck her. -
This is where my political position comes from:
-
Don't Blame Me I Voted For Kerry
-
I'm glad I took the over how many logical fallacies you'd squeeze into one thread.TheGlove said:
wnd.com is your source? They use John Fucking Rocker as a contributor. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.MikeDamone said:
How many logical fallacies can the glove commit in one thread? The o/u is 5TheGlove said:
fixerated.RaceBannon said:
I didn't like the article you linkedTheGlove said:
I don't really need your help, thanks. But this might help you out, the bumper-sticker analogy is threaded throughout the article as an illustration of the main point. In other words, her opinion about mopeds, cars, guns, or cigarettes (was it the mention of "dangerous guns" that threw you into a tailspin?) doesn't make a bit of difference.CuntWaffle said:
If you can't see how hypocritical that paragraph is then I can't help you.TheGlove said:
It's tough when the article takes longer to read than you can actually focus on something.CuntWaffle said:"Are mopeds dangerous? Sure, if by dangerous you mean significantly riskier than cars but slightly less direful than motorcycles. They are not dangerous compared to smoking a lot of cigarettes or owning a gun. The point is that, while nothing about the bumper sticker backed up its ominous claim, I automatically accepted it."
Stopped reading after that.
Do you have ADD?was a bumper stickerbecause it made conservatives look bad.
HTH
He links an article and goes ape shit. Christ.
You doing exactly what the article says unthinking Fucktards do. .which is classic confirmation bias. You may have proven this right by your own example.
I can do it too.
PROVE THIS WRONG POINT BY POINT!
wnd.com/2010/03/127614/
But seriously, the Elmore article does point out that email/internet are used to spread misinformation more easily. Agreed. Then he just goes on to bash anyone he can find with no scientific evidence. Richwine too, offers no different scientific results just tries (valiantly) to pick away at a couple of unrelated studies.
Did you get your Watch Word Bible yet? God's word comes to life on DVD. -
The glove is a boov. Epic pressing comes with the territory.
-
Interesting article. Thanks for sharing Glove.
-
What a thought provoking and stimulating conversation.
-
That's what keeps people coming back to the internetsThomasFremont said:What a thought provoking and stimulating conversation.
