Photo of New Helmet.

LoneStarDawg

RoadDawg55 said:

brchco12 said:

my read is that we're installing the no-huddle to get our defense ready to face it. I think sark is a purist (to a liability) and doesn't want to use the no huddle unless we've caught the opponent in a bad player package.

If by purist, you mean a guy who emphasizes the skill positions and prefers to trick the defense by fancy play calls than physical, fundamental football, then yes, he is a purist.

thats exactly what I mean, he'll take a whole quarter setting up a play action bomb instead of just shoving the ball down their throat. He never used Polk unless he had to, he hates ugly football, even though we love it and it works. But, hesitantly, I think he's learning.

I hope Tosh puts together a good DL so that he realizes how much our OL sucks.

RoadDawg55

brchco12 said:

RoadDawg55 said:

brchco12 said:

my read is that we're installing the no-huddle to get our defense ready to face it. I think sark is a purist (to a liability) and doesn't want to use the no huddle unless we've caught the opponent in a bad player package.

If by purist, you mean a guy who emphasizes the skill positions and prefers to trick the defense by fancy play calls than physical, fundamental football, then yes, he is a purist.

thats exactly what I mean, he'll take a whole quarter setting up a play action bomb instead of just shoving the ball down their throat. He never used Polk unless he had to, he hates ugly football, even though we love it and it works. But, hesitantly, I think he's learning.

I hope Tosh puts together a good DL so that he realizes how much our OL sucks.

My personal opinion is he hates "ugly football" because he wants to be known as an one of the best offensive minds in college football. He likes to receive the credit for his cute play calls. Anyone can call dives, powers, counters, and sweeps. There is no innovation in that, so it bores Sark.

I am curious to hear why you think he is learning. I don't agree with that at all. If there was ever a time for him to run 70% of the time, it was last year. He had an OL that sucked at pass blocking, a QB who was shell shocked and immobile, a WR corps with only two reliable options, and a stud RB. I didn't see a coach who was learning, I saw the same stubborn coach who runs what he wants to run whether it suits his personnel or not.

HillsboroDuck

brchco12 said:

RoadDawg55 said:

brchco12 said:

my read is that we're installing the no-huddle to get our defense ready to face it. I think sark is a purist (to a liability) and doesn't want to use the no huddle unless we've caught the opponent in a bad player package.

If by purist, you mean a guy who emphasizes the skill positions and prefers to trick the defense by fancy play calls than physical, fundamental football, then yes, he is a purist.

thats exactly what I mean, he'll take a whole quarter setting up a play action bomb instead of just shoving the ball down their throat. He never used Polk unless he had to, he hates ugly football, even though we love it and it works. But, hesitantly, I think he's learning.

I hope Tosh puts together a good DL so that he realizes how much our OL sucks.

If Sark needs a quality DL at UW to realize our OL sucks then he's even dumber than I thought.

LoneStarDawg

RoadDawg55 said:

brchco12 said:

RoadDawg55 said:

brchco12 said:

my read is that we're installing the no-huddle to get our defense ready to face it. I think sark is a purist (to a liability) and doesn't want to use the no huddle unless we've caught the opponent in a bad player package.

If by purist, you mean a guy who emphasizes the skill positions and prefers to trick the defense by fancy play calls than physical, fundamental football, then yes, he is a purist.

thats exactly what I mean, he'll take a whole quarter setting up a play action bomb instead of just shoving the ball down their throat. He never used Polk unless he had to, he hates ugly football, even though we love it and it works. But, hesitantly, I think he's learning.

I hope Tosh puts together a good DL so that he realizes how much our OL sucks.

My personal opinion is he hates "ugly football" because he wants to be known as an one of the best offensive minds in college football. He likes to receive the credit for his cute play calls. Anyone can call dives, powers, counters, and sweeps. There is no innovation in that, so it bores Sark.

I am curious to hear why you think he is learning. I don't agree with that at all. If there was ever a time for him to run 70% of the time, it was last year. He had an OL that sucked at pass blocking, a QB who was shell shocked and immobile, a WR corps with only two reliable options, and a stud RB. I didn't see a coach who was learning, I saw the same stubborn coach who runs what he wants to run whether it suits his personnel or not.

i think he's realizing that UW doesn't give a shit about a beautiful passing attack, which apparently is beyond confusing to him. it should hopefully make him want to go someplace else, hopefully he goes when Wilcox leaves or we're in more trouble.

HeretoBeatmyChest

I don't know who said it but Sark wants to hear how great of a play caller he is. After the Stanford game, we found out that Sark watches the tv broadcast while Wilcox watches the coaches one which has multiple angles (sideline, end zone).

[Deleted User]

Before he came to UW, Sark never had to work as a coach.

At USC you always have the most talent so it doesn't matter what you call you will put up big numbers.

He was only the OC at USC for two fucking years!! Why it was such a reckless hire.