Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How to fix the dem party?

BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,367 Standard Supporter

The rats have a real man problem. By real I mean REAL men. Not the pussies like the last VP candidate who lied about every masculine thing he claimed he could do. The rats tried so hard to portray the girlfriend slapping, nanny knock up artist Doug Emhoff as a real man. He was less popular with men than Headboard was. Then they tried to portray Walz as a real man and failed miserably. The rat party clearly does not value REAL men as they have tried to destroy masculinity for decades and by all accounts have succeeded in destroying masculinity in democrat following men. Look at the cucks on here for instance.

67% of men look down on democrats and their party. That is a huge number. Only 31% of the country looks favorably on democrats currently. The lowest polling position for the party in history.

Essentially they have finally brought upon their own temporary demise. They have demonized men for so long that they lost all but the cucks and that has hurt them on both the vote count and their party's gender bending platform. One could argue that party leadership and dem goose stepping follower don't even know what a REAL man is anymore. They just put a 125 wimp in as part of the dnc leadership. David Hogg is hardly the type to draw in the lost man vote.

The Democratic Party has a man problem - Washington Examiner

Explanations are aplenty for the Democratic Party’s precipitous decline in popularity. Many on the Left have blamed “messaging,” conveniently enough, as if their deeply unpopular ideas would suddenly turn popular if they were “messaged” correctly. Others have criticized the party’s lack of commitment to its core ideas — or to any ideas at all. Still more have accused the party of being overly committed to too many preposterous ideas of the cultural variety. 

But these speculations gloss over the Democratic Party’s most fundamental problem: Its brand has become toxic to men. According to the Quinnipiac poll, a staggering 67% of men hold an unfavorable view of the Democratic Party, while only 22% approve. 

A party that repels 2 in 3 men is not viable. For Democrats to regain their national influence, they must reflect on why men of every color, class, and creed have abandoned them. 

A good place to begin would be by addressing the implicit assumption in Democratic circles that men are inherently part of an “oppressor” class that is privileged above their biological counterparts. This curious interpretation of sex relations reduces men and women to mere interest groups locked in a struggle for power, not as fundamentally complementary and cooperative. This not only defies the lived experience of untold generations who witnessed mothers and fathers lovingly sharing the burdens of life, but this reductivist view drives men away from the Democratic Party in droves. If nothing else, demonizing, shaming, and lecturing half of the electorate is an abysmal political strategy.

Comments

  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,229

    They can’t win men back because all that’s left are gays and HR ladies.

    That’s the real democrat problem, it’s the party for unhappy women and black people.

    Another thing that people don’t talk as much about is that there has been this major push to celebrate and pedestalize black people since around the early Obama days and I see that coming to an end. I think part of it was like if we pretend that they are amazing they will make socioeconomic gains by not being oppressed. But since it’s gotten worse overall no one is buying it. Educational achievement is probably worse than ever.

    All these things that are the core foundation of the dems can’t just be changed. The party has to be completely remade until it’s just dems in name.

  • EverettChrisEverettChris Member Posts: 5,732 Standard Supporter
    edited February 4

    I’m appalled that the party of Robert E. Lee, Robert Byrd, and other slavery owners/supporters hasn’t been completely eliminated.

    The “party switch” that never happened is the best they can do to try and gaslight people. The party is removing statues of their own racist party members yet still continues to view people first on their skin color. It’s now seen as an anti-USA party, as exhibited by the TugTards here defending illegal aliens blocking roadways in the US while burning our flags and waving their own. Also actively rooting for the interests of Canada, Mexico, Panama, and China so they can laugh at Trump.

    A very fucked in the head assortment of grifters, the mentally ill, shrieking Karens of anll anges, and toxically feminized men.

    “Sure, we’re the party that was founded in and fought to continue slavery, but that all changed in the 1960s and now it’s the party who fought to, in part, end slavery that are racist. Oh, that former KKK recruiter Burd who has the Senate billion named after him, yeah, we just pretend he changed because it’s really all we can do about him.”

Sign In or Register to comment.