Furnace & Pucket
Comments
-
Heeyyyyyyyy it's my ole' buddy beezzlebitch. Stop embarrassing the .0001% of coog nation that actually has nothing to say about this loss to Rutgers.beelzebub said:Only difference between uw and wsu this year is we laugh at u 48 hours later
I think you just insinuated that uw will lose to Hawaii. Christ. -
Sankey wouldn't have mattered for Wazzu because the pirate would have only ran him five times a game, simple fact.
-
I guess it wouldn't have made a difference is what I meant. All other things remaining equal, he would not have resulted in more wins for WSU, and I believe it would have been a detriment to his development.haie said:
Sankey's done well behind some mediocre to bad lines. He just wouldn't have made a difference because your coach is a fucking moron that thinks he's a mastermind.Blackie said:
Not getting Sankey wasn't a big deal. He wouldn't have done dick with the lack of OL talent on WSU roster.jecornel said:Three years ago, said hiring Leach was the greatest day for cougar football and that they now had a premier coach now.
Oh and I also remember them saying they didn't miss getting Sankey. That it wasn't a loss for the program and he wasn't even close to the best back in UW history. I think there is an argument there for Sankey being top 2 or 3?
I just might tune in today.
Also, quite a crowd last night. Sounders get more fans. They must be thrilled about the pirate, they came out 30,000 strong. Smallest Seattle game crowd since doing it, by 10,000. -
I think I agree with you, now that you phrase it that way. It doesn't matter if you have Barry Sanders in your backfield if your coach refuses to run the ball and your OL sucks more dick than KJV under a corner booth at the Ram with Sark and crew.Blackie said:
I guess it wouldn't have made a difference is what I meant. All other things remaining equal, he would not have resulted in more wins for WSU, and I believe it would have been a detriment to his development.haie said:
Sankey's done well behind some mediocre to bad lines. He just wouldn't have made a difference because your coach is a fucking moron that thinks he's a mastermind.Blackie said:
Not getting Sankey wasn't a big deal. He wouldn't have done dick with the lack of OL talent on WSU roster.jecornel said:Three years ago, said hiring Leach was the greatest day for cougar football and that they now had a premier coach now.
Oh and I also remember them saying they didn't miss getting Sankey. That it wasn't a loss for the program and he wasn't even close to the best back in UW history. I think there is an argument there for Sankey being top 2 or 3?
I just might tune in today.
Also, quite a crowd last night. Sounders get more fans. They must be thrilled about the pirate, they came out 30,000 strong. Smallest Seattle game crowd since doing it, by 10,000. -
christbeelzebub said:Only difference between uw and wsu this year is we laugh at u 48 hours later
-
Sankey was UW's most consistent player and had a great fucking attitude. It sucked to see him in purple/black/pink instead of crimson and grey, especially since he was a local kid. I'd rather live off him and a shitty line than our spoiled brat qb.
The pics with snoop have gone to his fucking head. -
No running back worth anything wants 6 carries per game
-
Will someone put this pillow biter out of him misery?beelzebub said:Only difference between uw and wsu this year is we laugh at u 48 hours later
-
It's like a WR going to Oregon.TierbsHsotBoobs said:No running back worth anything wants 6 carries per game






