Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

OFFICIAL Make America Healthy Again Game Thread - Featuring Dr Anthony Chaffee

1303132333436»

Comments

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    edited November 2024

    You seem really focused on MMR. Your proof against — the Deadly Immunity article* — barely mentions MMR in passing. It is focused on the effects of Thimerosal (read: MERCURY) across all vaccines.

    .

    I appreciate you found the Deadly Immunity article. It was on my list to find a read. Again, amateur philosopher, but I have some thoughts.

    Just because the article was retracted/removed, doesn't mean it was done so credibly. Frankly it follows the pattern of covering for the problem instead of addressing the problem. None of the critiques are aimed at the historical narrative - a huge tell. Reading the "corrections" at the end of the article, one can easily determine those corrections don't materially effect the underlying argument. Sure, 99x more than recommended dose of Mercury is better than 189x, but still ….

    This following paragraph is the correction of the correction!

    Since that earlier correction, however, it has become clear from responses to the article that the forty-percent number, while accurate, is misleading. It measures the total mercury load an infant received from vaccines during the first six months, calculates the daily average received based on average body weight, and then compares that number to the EPA daily limit. But infants did not receive the vaccines as a ?daily average? ? they received massive doses on a single day, through multiple shots. As the story states, these single-day doses exceeded the EPA limit by as much as 99 times. Based on the misunderstanding, and to avoid further confusion, we have amended the story to eliminate the forty-percent figure.

    All of that to obfuscate the over-arching point of having mercury in vaccines at all.

    "You couldn't even construct a study that shows thimerosal is safe," says Haley, who heads the chemistry department at the University of Kentucky. "It's just too darn toxic. If you inject thimerosal into an animal, its brain will sicken. If you apply it to living tissue, the cells die. If you put it in a petri dish, the culture dies. Knowing these things, it would be shocking if one could inject it into an infant without causing damage."

    .

    *The Lancet retracted their study, which is fine and honorable. But that fact does not impact later work on the topic to the degree it is cited as source. I haven't seen RFK use this retracted study as a source, but am willing to be corrected. The Fox News link didn't work for me.

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,722 Founders Club

    Damn, I was just gonna start advertising what I have available.