Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

main reason UW isnt favorite in the north

Snark didnt recruit a QB in 2010, 2011. He wiffed On Hundley, Kessler, and Mariota (All were UW leans at some point). Sark took Montana and Antavius Sims-Derrick Brown in '10 and '11 respectively. Thats why I blame Sark for fucking up the qb situation for Petersen. Complete fuckshow around here during Sark's tenure.

With Mariota or any fucking serviceable upperclassman with experience at QB and Petersen and co would be a serious contender to we in this conference. Sark flat ignored the qb situation (this from a supposed QB guru and genius.)

Update: Heaps just lost the starting QB job to a true freshman @ Miami.
«13

Comments

  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Snark didnt recruit a QB in 2010, 2011. He wiffed On Hundley, Kessler, and Mariota (All were UW leans at some point). Sark took Montana and Antavius Sims-Derrick Brown in '10 and '11 respectively. Thats why I blame Sark for fucking up the qb situation for Petersen. Complete fuckshow around here during Sark's tenure.

    With Mariota or any fucking serviceable upperclassman with experience at QB and Petersen and co would be a serious contender to we in this conference. Sark flat ignored the qb situation (this from a supposed QB guru and genius.)

    Update: Heaps just lost the starting QB job to a true freshman @ Miami.

    Disagree
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    But how does that make Sark a bad recruiter? He recruited Joe Montana's kid? Remember how coo it was having Joe and his wife roam the sidelines for four years?
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,096 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2014

    The QB situation Sark left Petersen is fine, or at least it is good enough to where a good coach can step in and win.

    This. Lindquist and Miles were four star recruits IIRC. Hyphen guy is too (not a Snark recruit, but still).
  • Dardanus
    Dardanus Member Posts: 2,623
    The main reason UW isn't the favorite to win the north is because over the last three years they have finished 3rd, 4th, and 3rd in the north. Stanford and Oregon, on the other hand, have finished either 1st or 2nd each year.

    If UW had Mariota but the results were the same, UW would still not be the favorite to win the north.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500

    You're not picked to win the North because since 2004 UW has been a sex slave to Oregon. Let's also not forget they have been one of the worst road teams in the conference as well. You now have Peterman, but he actually needs a year to show some progress.

    /thread
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,014

    You're not picked to win the North because since 2004 UW has been a sex slave to Oregon. Let's also not forget they have been one of the worst road teams in the conference as well. You now have Peterman, but he actually needs a five years to show some progress.

    FTFY