main reason UW isnt favorite in the north

puppylove_sugarsteel

Snark didnt recruit a QB in 2010, 2011. He wiffed On Hundley, Kessler, and Mariota (All were UW leans at some point). Sark took Montana and Antavius Sims-Derrick Brown in '10 and '11 respectively. Thats why I blame Sark for fucking up the qb situation for Petersen. Complete fuckshow around here during Sark's tenure.

With Mariota or any fucking serviceable upperclassman with experience at QB and Petersen and co would be a serious contender to we in this conference. Sark flat ignored the qb situation (this from a supposed QB guru and genius.)

Update: Heaps just lost the starting QB job to a true freshman @ Miami.

ThomasFremont

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Snark didnt recruit a QB in 2010, 2011. He wiffed On Hundley, Kessler, and Mariota (All were UW leans at some point). Sark took Montana and Antavius Sims-Derrick Brown in '10 and '11 respectively. Thats why I blame Sark for fucking up the qb situation for Petersen. Complete fuckshow around here during Sark's tenure.

With Mariota or any fucking serviceable upperclassman with experience at QB and Petersen and co would be a serious contender to we in this conference. Sark flat ignored the qb situation (this from a supposed QB guru and genius.)

Update: Heaps just lost the starting QB job to a true freshman @ Miami.

Disagree

chrisvashon

There are many (many) things to bash Sark about. QB recruiting is not one.

jecornel

But how does that make Sark a bad recruiter? He recruited Joe Montana's kid? Remember how coo it was having Joe and his wife roam the sidelines for four years?

CuntWaffle

The QB situation Sark left Petersen is fine, or at least it is good enough to where a good coach can step in and win.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

CuntWaffle said:

The QB situation Sark left Petersen is fine, or at least it is good enough to where a good coach can step in and win.

This. Lindquist and Miles were four star recruits IIRC. Hyphen guy is too (not a Snark recruit, but still).

Dardanus

The main reason UW isn't the favorite to win the north is because over the last three years they have finished 3rd, 4th, and 3rd in the north. Stanford and Oregon, on the other hand, have finished either 1st or 2nd each year.

If UW had Mariota but the results were the same, UW would still not be the favorite to win the north.

greenblood

You're not picked to win the North because since 2004 UW has been a sex slave to Oregon. Let's also not forget they have been one of the worst road teams in the conference as well. You now have Peterman, but he actually needs a year to show some progress.

CuntWaffle

greenblood said:

You're not picked to win the North because since 2004 UW has been a sex slave to Oregon. Let's also not forget they have been one of the worst road teams in the conference as well. You now have Peterman, but he actually needs a year to show some progress.

/thread

IrishDawg22

@puppylove_sugarsteel‌

You should stay off the boards until you start to feel better. If you need any help feel free to shoot me a PM to get your meds dialed back in.

whatshouldicareabout

greenblood said:

You're not picked to win the North because since 2004 UW has been a sex slave to Oregon. Let's also not forget they have been one of the worst road teams in the conference as well. You now have Peterman, but he actually needs a five years to show some progress.

FTFY

RoadDawg55

greenblood said:

You're not picked to win the North because since 2004 UW has been a sex slave to Oregon. Let's also not forget they have been one of the worst road teams in the conference as well. You now have Peterman, but he actually needs a year to show some progress.

Fucking this. Oregon has a better roster and better recent (and not so recent) success. Stanford has gone to a BCS Bowl the past four years. Third is right where we should be.

Oregon is the favorite although a logical Duck fan would admit Helfrich and last seasons implosion is a concern. Stanford has to replace a ton and plays a fucking brutal schedule. I think the smart money is on UW finishing ahead of Stanford, but I have no problem with being picked third.

GrundleStiltzkin

CuntWaffle said:

greenblood said:

You're not picked to win the North because since 2004 UW has been a sex slave to Oregon. Let's also not forget they have been one of the worst road teams in the conference as well. You now have Peterman, but he actually needs a year to show some progress.

/thread

Pretty much, sadly.

puppylove_sugarsteel

chrisvashon said:

There are many (many) things to bash Sark about. QB recruiting is not one.

QB recruiting isnt one? You guys are fucking tarded. Can you think of one successful coach from any conference in america, who didnt recruit a qb for 2 years and didnt get ANY backup reps during blowouts or big losses? Miles got reps ONLY because slew foot himself keith price stubbed his toe.

Sark had ZERO fuckin g clue about preparing a backup. Fuck at least dawgman's herd can see this. Road, im $ urprised by your retardation, the rest of you blimps I can understand

CuntWaffle

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

chrisvashon said:

There are many (many) things to bash Sark about. QB recruiting is not one.

Can you think of one successful coach from any conference in america, who didnt recruit a qb for 2 years and didnt get ANY backup reps during blowouts or big losses?

on thursday night games whos date ends in an odd number and the coach drank a white cherry slurpee the night before?

puppylove_sugarsteel

CuntWaffle said:

The QB situation Sark left Petersen is fine, or at least it is good enough to where a good coach can step in and win.

Really? Go back and look at husky QB's past. Aside from Ty, a sprinkle of the Weaz and now Sark, there's always been a capable backup. Not the case from what im hearing...We are fucked if Miles goes down. We'll find out about Lindquist a bit Saturday (a RS sophomore with 1 handoff during garbage time. ) Thats Sarks fault. He butchered the QB situation...if you cant see that turn your full attention back to the WNBA playoffs . Just shaking my head at your dumbass

CuntWaffle

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

CuntWaffle said:

The QB situation Sark left Petersen is fine, or at least it is good enough to where a good coach can step in and win.

Really? Go back and look at husky QB's past. Aside from Ty and now Sark, there's always been a capable backup. Not the case from what im hearing...We are fucked if Miles goes down. We'll find out about Lindquist a bit Saturday (a RS sophomore with 1 handoff during garbage time. Thats Sarks fault. He butchered the QB situation...if you cant see that turn your full attention back to the WNBA playoffs . Just shaking my head at your dumbass

#MyMercury

puppylove_sugarsteel

#onlyfagsuse#'s

ThomasFremont

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

chrisvashon said:

There are many (many) things to bash Sark about. QB recruiting is not one.

QB recruiting isnt one? You guys are fucking tarded. Can you think of one successful coach from any conference in america, who didnt recruit a qb for 2 years and didnt get ANY backup reps during blowouts or big losses? Miles got reps ONLY because slew foot himself keith price stubbed his toe.

Sark had ZERO fuckin g clue about preparing a backup. Fuck at least dawgman's herd can see this. Road, im $ urprised by your retardation, the rest of you blimps I can understand

There are currently three 4* QBs on the roster that Sark brought in.

Another left the program early.

This is LITERALLY the only thing you can't hammer Sark about.

The fact that the doogs on Doogman agree with you only confirms my poont.

Now go roll off the Aurora Bridge and die in a pile of ebola infested dead bodies you fucking doog.

CuntWaffle

Paging @FRANNY.... Meds haven't been dialed in for a couple days.

kh83

The problem isn't the quality. It's the sequencing. In a perfect world, we'd be replacing our 5th year senior with a 4th year junior or 5th year senior. As is, we have a highly rated 3rd year Soph. The last 3rd year soph we had wasn't particularly highly rated but ended up ok. I think we'll be just fine.