Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

main reason UW isnt favorite in the north

2

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,386 Standard Supporter
    greenblood said:

    You're not picked to win the North because since 2004 UW has been a sex slave to Oregon. Let's also not forget they have been one of the worst road teams in the conference as well. You now have Peterman, but he actually needs a year to show some progress.

    Fucking this. Oregon has a better roster and better recent (and not so recent) success. Stanford has gone to a BCS Bowl the past four years. Third is right where we should be.

    Oregon is the favorite although a logical Duck fan would admit Helfrich and last seasons implosion is a concern. Stanford has to replace a ton and plays a fucking brutal schedule. I think the smart money is on UW finishing ahead of Stanford, but I have no problem with being picked third.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    CuntWaffle said:

    greenblood said:

    You're not picked to win the North because since 2004 UW has been a sex slave to Oregon. Let's also not forget they have been one of the worst road teams in the conference as well. You now have Peterman, but he actually needs a year to show some progress.

    /thread
    Pretty much, sadly.
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    edited August 2014
    chrisvashon said:

    There are many (many) things to bash Sark about. QB recruiting is not one.

    QB recruiting isnt one? You guys are fucking tarded. Can you think of one successful coach from any conference in america, who didnt recruit a qb for 2 years and didnt get ANY backup reps during blowouts or big losses? Miles got reps ONLY because slew foot himself keith price stubbed his toe.

    Sark had ZERO fuckin g clue about preparing a backup. Fuck at least dawgman's herd can see this. Road, im $ urprised by your retardation, the rest of you blimps I can understand
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    chrisvashon said:

    There are many (many) things to bash Sark about. QB recruiting is not one.

    Can you think of one successful coach from any conference in america, who didnt recruit a qb for 2 years and didnt get ANY backup reps during blowouts or big losses?
    on thursday night games whos date ends in an odd number and the coach drank a white cherry slurpee the night before?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    edited August 2014
    CuntWaffle said:

    The QB situation Sark left Petersen is fine, or at least it is good enough to where a good coach can step in and win.

    Really? Go back and look at husky QB's past. Aside from Ty, a sprinkle of the Weaz and now Sark, there's always been a capable backup. Not the case from what im hearing...We are fucked if Miles goes down. We'll find out about Lindquist a bit Saturday (a RS sophomore with 1 handoff during garbage time. ) Thats Sarks fault. He butchered the QB situation...if you cant see that turn your full attention back to the WNBA playoffs . Just shaking my head at your dumbass
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    chrisvashon said:

    There are many (many) things to bash Sark about. QB recruiting is not one.

    QB recruiting isnt one? You guys are fucking tarded. Can you think of one successful coach from any conference in america, who didnt recruit a qb for 2 years and didnt get ANY backup reps during blowouts or big losses? Miles got reps ONLY because slew foot himself keith price stubbed his toe.

    Sark had ZERO fuckin g clue about preparing a backup. Fuck at least dawgman's herd can see this. Road, im $ urprised by your retardation, the rest of you blimps I can understand
    There are currently three 4* QBs on the roster that Sark brought in.

    Another left the program early.

    This is LITERALLY the only thing you can't hammer Sark about.

    The fact that the doogs on Doogman agree with you only confirms my poont.

    Now go roll off the Aurora Bridge and die in a pile of ebola infested dead bodies you fucking doog.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • kh83
    kh83 Member Posts: 596
    The problem isn't the quality. It's the sequencing. In a perfect world, we'd be replacing our 5th year senior with a 4th year junior or 5th year senior. As is, we have a highly rated 3rd year Soph. The last 3rd year soph we had wasn't particularly highly rated but ended up ok. I think we'll be just fine.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter