Oregon has 1 rose bowl win in a century

puppylove_sugarsteel

Ok, 95 years. Just thought I'd remind you guys.

dnc

I like what you're trying to do here but you picked the wrong bored. Here you go.

puppylove_sugarsteel

Arizona has never been to a rose bowl. In case you're wondering

haie

TierbsHsotBoobs

DOOG POST O' THE WEEK!

RaceBannon

HeretoBeatmyChest

From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.

TierbsHsotBoobs

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.

College football history started in 2006.

Also, any system that considers Oregon better than Alabama from 2006 to 2013 is fucking stupid.

whatshouldicareabout

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.

Gil Dobie and I laugh at that statement.

CuntWaffle

When one of my good buddies told me he was going to Oregon, I told him they had a great gas pumping degree ROFL!!!12!!!!!

Southerndawg

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.

College football history started in 2006.

Also, any system that considers Oregon better than Alabama from 2006 to 2013 is fucking stupid.

It's a flawed system, gives too much credit for blow out wins, and too little credit to teams that win with defense.

dhdawg

Southerndawg said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.

College football history started in 2006.

Also, any system that considers Oregon better than Alabama from 2006 to 2013 is fucking stupid.

It's a flawed system, gives too much credit for blow out wins, and too little credit to teams that win with defense.

agree and disagree. Yes it puts way too much into blow out wins.
Winning with defense doesn't necessarily not produce blowouts though. Look at the seahawks this season

greenblood

dhdawg said:

Southerndawg said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.

College football history started in 2006.

Also, any system that considers Oregon better than Alabama from 2006 to 2013 is fucking stupid.

It's a flawed system, gives too much credit for blow out wins, and too little credit to teams that win with defense.

agree and disagree. Yes it puts way too much into blow out wins.
Winning with defense doesn't necessarily not produce blowouts though. Look at the seahawks this season

In the most important game, the Seahawk defense outscored the supposedly best offense in football. That's what I saw.

whlinder

...and it was against Russell Wilson

oregonblitzkrieg

Oregon also has 1 appearance in an actual BCS championship game that's won or lost on the field, not voted on and shared with other teams we've never played. Rather be us than you. Fuck off. Duckade.

oregonblitzkrieg

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

DOOG POST O' THE MONTH!

ThomasFremont

oregonblitzkrieg said:

Oregon also has 1 appearance in an actual BCS championship game that's won or lost on the field, not voted on and shared with other teams we've never played. Rather be us than you. Fuck off. Duckade.

sarktastic

You beat Sark and Ty and made t-shirts?