So hypothetically if Biden loses he could hypothetically order the hypothetical elimination of Mr Trump given that he actually is a threat to democracy.
Assassinating an elected President-elect because he is a “threat to Democracy” would make Biden a clear “threat to Democracy” and he’d be prosecuted and court-martialed.
That’s not at all what the SCOTUS decision allows but you Retards get fed talking points and spout them as factual.
You Leftists are completely unhinged and it’s rapidly reaching mass psychosis.
I'm just referencing the decision. Biden could argue that he was acting in an official capacity. SCOTUS granted absolute immunity to offical actions. So it comes down to convincing a jury that his actions were official.
The ruling today gives absolute immunity for actions taken in an official capacity. But it's impossible to make a list of official duties since the president could argue virtually any action is official. So in the hypothetical case of assassination of a rival, the president could argue it was his official duty, provide evidence, try to persuade the jury. That example was provided in the dissenting opinion. The jury would probably not buy it, but like any trial it depends on the evidence, jury, etc. The point is that a president can seriously present such an argument now.
Being assassinated by the military is illegal though and such assassins are not given immunity. The point is that the president has been given absolute immunity — if he can prove it is "official."
The ruling is quite clear it needs to be an official duty under the Constitution. Offing American traitors in Afghanistan who have taken up arms against American soldiers is an official duty of the Commander in Chief. Offing your political opponent who isn't engaged in an insurrection isn't an official duty of the Commander-in-Chief. Like I said, federal judges of absolute immunity and they don't get to execute American citizens because that's not in their official duties. If they mistakenly sentence someone to death, they can't be sued. Just like barry and Holder can't be sued for Fast and Furious which did have plausible deniability.
Comments
The president was running guns to the cartels and ISIS. Yet he's walking around free…
So hypothetically if Biden loses he could hypothetically order the hypothetical elimination of Mr Trump given that he actually is a threat to democracy.
Assassinating an elected President-elect because he is a “threat to Democracy” would make Biden a clear “threat to Democracy” and he’d be prosecuted and court-martialed.
That’s not at all what the SCOTUS decision allows but you Retards get fed talking points and spout them as factual.
You Leftists are completely unhinged and it’s rapidly reaching mass psychosis.
I'm just referencing the decision. Biden could argue that he was acting in an official capacity. SCOTUS granted absolute immunity to offical actions. So it comes down to convincing a jury that his actions were official.
Bull shit
Where is it in the official duties of a President to order and execute the President-elect who just defeated you?
This is nonsensical and shows how desperate Democrats are to hold onto power.
Would love to see how this polls.
The ruling today gives absolute immunity for actions taken in an official capacity. But it's impossible to make a list of official duties since the president could argue virtually any action is official. So in the hypothetical case of assassination of a rival, the president could argue it was his official duty, provide evidence, try to persuade the jury. That example was provided in the dissenting opinion. The jury would probably not buy it, but like any trial it depends on the evidence, jury, etc. The point is that a president can seriously present such an argument now.
he could.
He could also get hung up Mussolini style by the military for making such a fucking stupid order.
If only there were some other means by which to remove a president. Maybe we should give that power to Congress
Being assassinated by the military is illegal though and such assassins are not given immunity. The point is that the president has been given absolute immunity — if he can prove it is "official."
A minute ago the left wanted Trump in jail or dead, now they just want him dead.
🤔
They always did.
Right back at ya. You're a good dude as well. America and Big Ern have had a rough few days. You know how I do sometimes. I need FOOTBALL.
Says the voter of the guy who actually, factually, desperately tried to hold on to power.
The ruling is quite clear it needs to be an official duty under the Constitution. Offing American traitors in Afghanistan who have taken up arms against American soldiers is an official duty of the Commander in Chief. Offing your political opponent who isn't engaged in an insurrection isn't an official duty of the Commander-in-Chief. Like I said, federal judges of absolute immunity and they don't get to execute American citizens because that's not in their official duties. If they mistakenly sentence someone to death, they can't be sued. Just like barry and Holder can't be sued for Fast and Furious which did have plausible deniability.
FWIW,
"I believe, " Absolute immunity doesn't provide protection when fraud was perpetrated.
Meaning if a person became President fraudulently they are not protected from prosecution
Fraud vitiates everything.
We better check with @HHusky to be sure though.
When you find a president like that, let us know.
What would you like us to do when you repeatedly ignore the (copious and growing amount of) evidence? Please advise.
.