The smaller remaining states would get to keep all the federal money they receive and stop subsidizing the self-reliant libertarians of the dirt to boot.
So your view is that a complete overhaul of state boundaries would result in the same federal assistance allocation, including for agricultural subsidies?
Yikes. Next you'll tell me that food prices wouldn't change
Comments
A new state still gets federal money
Scoreboard
If it were to stop "Greater Idaho" would be even poorer, so I don't see your point.
A larger state, not a new one.
The smaller remaining states would get to keep all the federal money they receive and stop subsidizing the self-reliant libertarians of the dirt to boot.
So your view is that a complete overhaul of state boundaries would result in the same federal assistance allocation, including for agricultural subsidies?
Yikes. Next you'll tell me that food prices wouldn't change
It's the same dirt no matter where you draw the lines. But if more agricultural subsidies is your plan for a solvent Greater Idaho, good luck.
H is a big solvent government guy.