Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UW #23 - USA Today season preview

IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
edited August 2014 in Hardcore Husky Board
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2014/08/13/washington-huskies-2014-countdown-preview-roster-depth-chart-schedule-football-four/13988369/

"2013 Low point: The three-week run of Stanford, Oregon and Arizona State. Strong indeed is the team that can survive such a stretch. The Huskies weren't quite there."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"In a nutshell: One of the great coaches in college football has walked into an optimal situation. This isn't just in the long run, though it's easy to get caught up dreaming about what Petersen can achieve during the course of a half-decade in Seattle"
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,351 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited August 2014
    ...we're winning at least one of those...if not two.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,020 Founders Club
    NOC
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    If we don't go 2-1 at home vs Furd, Asu and ucla I will be disappointed. 11-2 or 10-3
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited August 2014
    He's obviously a good coach but he hasn't proved himself in the big leagues yet. You will likely beat ASU. UCLA, I wouldn't bet on it the way they owned you up and down the field last year. But Zumwalt is gone, so you might have a chance. And Stanford is a mountain you might not have the chops yet to climb.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,599 Swaye's Wigwam
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    He's obviously a good coach but he hasn't proved himself in the big leagues yet. You will likely beat ASU. UCLA, I wouldn't bet on it the way they owned you up and down the field last year. But Zumwalt is gone, so you might have a chance. And Stanford is a mountain you might not have the chops yet to climb.

    You didnt watch the UCLA game if that's what you think happened
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    Minus Sark we went toe to toe with ucla while sark himself motivated Jack. Now we upgraded coach and play at home. We seem to play Stanford better than anyone and we upgraded coach and now have a ST coach that will be good for 8.1 points alone.

    NYBE OBK
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,825
    The o/u in wins for the regular season is 10.5 ...

    OBKFS needs to remember that Seven Win Steve beat Stanford at home 2 years ago and should have beat them last year ... there's no reason to be afraid of them.

    As for UCLA, better ball security in the first 5 minutes of the game combined with Price not getting hurt leads to a win on the road last year. November in Seattle doesn't historically treat teams from SoCal too well.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    He's obviously a good coach but he hasn't proved himself in the big leagues yet. You will likely beat ASU. UCLA, I wouldn't bet on it the way they owned you up and down the field last year. But Zumwalt is gone, so you might have a chance. And Stanford is a mountain you might not have the chops yet to climb.

    You didnt watch the UCLA game if that's what you think happened
    It's been a while, but it looked like Myles Jack was ripping shit up while Zumwalt furnished the bookends on a convincing defeat.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited August 2014
    Tequilla said:

    The o/u in wins for the regular season is 10.5 ...

    OBKFS needs to remember that Seven Win Steve beat Stanford at home 2 years ago and should have beat them last year ... there's no reason to be afraid of them.

    As for UCLA, better ball security in the first 5 minutes of the game combined with Price not getting hurt leads to a win on the road last year. November in Seattle doesn't historically treat teams from SoCal too well.

    Almost beating Stanford 2 years ago and getting fucked over by our shitty kicker along with some bogus ref calls didn't get the ducks any love around these parts. If Stanford owned us in 2012 by winning by a field goal, they owned you in 2013, even though it was a close game decided by a few points. Keep the logic consistent.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWerentThereManUWerentThereMan Member Posts: 3,475
    they must not be dialed in with fauxman.com
    Petersen is lazy on the recruiting process, lots of concern.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited August 2014
    Are you really asking/wondering why ducks get no love on a husky website really? Ok no more picking on you pal.

    QPOTCentury
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,020 Founders Club
    I support OBK.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,825
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Tequilla said:

    The o/u in wins for the regular season is 10.5 ...

    OBKFS needs to remember that Seven Win Steve beat Stanford at home 2 years ago and should have beat them last year ... there's no reason to be afraid of them.

    As for UCLA, better ball security in the first 5 minutes of the game combined with Price not getting hurt leads to a win on the road last year. November in Seattle doesn't historically treat teams from SoCal too well.

    Almost beating Stanford 2 years ago and getting fucked over by our shitty kicker along with some bogus ref calls didn't get the ducks any love around these parts. If Stanford owned us in 2012 by winning by a field goal, they owned you in 2013, even though it was a close game decided by a few points. Keep the logic consistent.
    Stanford vs. Oregon 2012-2013: 2-0
    Stanford vs. Washington 2012-2013: 1-1

    Learn the difference fucktard
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,718 Swaye's Wigwam
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Almost beating Stanford 2 years ago and getting fucked over by our shitty kicker along with some bogus ref calls didn't get the ducks any love around these parts. If Stanford owned us in 2012 by winning by a field goal, they owned you in 2013, even though it was a close game decided by a few points. Keep the logic consistent.

    They did own us in 2013.

    http://espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=332780024

    The stats don't show it well but special teams and penalties screwed us over against Stanford (two of Sark's hallmarks as a coach). Montgomery had 204 yards on KOR, including a 99-yard TD and a 68-yard KOR that set up a TD 2 plays later. Barry Sander's PR in the 1Q put them deep in UW territory (but fortunately, Hogan sucks). We had 89 penalty yards but 4 of those penalties either killed our drives or kept Stanford's alive (holding on 3rd and short, hands to the face on a 3rd down stop, etc.).

    We may have outgained Stanford offensively 489-279, but they outgained us in special teams and penalty yards by a drastic 332-99. That's 233 of easy yards given up by shitty coaching. That's why they owned us.

    They owned us in 2013 but we know with a real football coach, the game will be significantly different here in Seattle.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,825
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Almost beating Stanford 2 years ago and getting fucked over by our shitty kicker along with some bogus ref calls didn't get the ducks any love around these parts. If Stanford owned us in 2012 by winning by a field goal, they owned you in 2013, even though it was a close game decided by a few points. Keep the logic consistent.

    They did own us in 2013.

    http://espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=332780024

    The stats don't show it well but special teams and penalties screwed us over against Stanford (two of Sark's hallmarks as a coach). Montgomery had 204 yards on KOR, including a 99-yard TD and a 68-yard KOR that set up a TD 2 plays later. Barry Sander's PR in the 1Q put them deep in UW territory (but fortunately, Hogan sucks). We had 89 penalty yards but 4 of those penalties either killed our drives or kept Stanford's alive (holding on 3rd and short, hands to the face on a 3rd down stop, etc.).

    We may have outgained Stanford offensively 489-279, but they outgained us in special teams and penalty yards by a drastic 332-99. That's 233 of easy yards given up by shitty coaching. That's why they owned us.

    They owned us in 2013 but we know with a real football coach, the game will be significantly different here in Seattle.
    Downvoted for not keeping it crisp ...

    Scoreboard Baby!!! is all that is needed here ...

    TS, DR
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,020 Founders Club
    Why is it always the 7th round picks and walk-ons that come out?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,228
    obk likes to post fucktarded bullshit, and then he gets all butthurt when he gets called on it.

    He's a complete fucking goat.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,921 Swaye's Wigwam
    As much as it pains me, I'm going to have to agree with splooge. Looking for love for the Ducks around here is OBKFS.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.