The Fisching Report Recruiting Thread Sponsored by The Fisch Bowl
Comments
-
It’s very simple. It doesn’t matter how many linemen are here in spring because they don’t play games in spring.
There are currently 13 linemen rostered. Full stop. Not nine. Not eight.
Feel free to find me a single roster with 20 scholarship linemen. It doesn’t exist in the 85 scholarship era. 14-16 is standard.
Numbers aren’t the problem. Experience and talent are. -
-
Experience, yes. Talent? Won’t really know until October. Watkins could be talented. Fasaalo could be talented. Jackett could be very talented. I’m pretty sure Gaard is talented. We’ll find out. But no, zero experience. Fingers crossed that both Huff and Carrol have good eyes for talent.
-
Enokk Vimahi looks pretty good against Michigan here (#66, RG). Looks as good as those fucks who went to Ole Miss to me.
-
Had offers from Oregon, Tennessee, USC, and others in 2018 (HS sophomore). For whatever reason, ended at Sac St.
-
Gee whiz, we are getting some ballers. I ain't scared. If only we can pick up another OL or two....
-
-
Disagree. 14-16 is low which may be an average since the portal and NIL were introduced. It is not ideal nor is it the standard. You can repeat your belief 100 times and it still won't become true just because you repeated it.
Disagree. Not 13 healthy or fully developed. People can be concerned with the absence of developed or healthy lineman EVEN if you say they can't.
Disagree. The 85 scholarship limit was imposed in 1992. 32 years ago. If you think there hasn't been a single roster of 20 scholarship OL out of nearly 4000 rosters, you are less cerebral than you sound.
Agree, quality is more important than quantity. Which is why some discount the benefit of having decent numbers in the '24 class. You can't teach a year of development over a couple of weeks in the fall.
Its almost like I said we need good (better quality) recruits. NO ONE that I know of said to sign more true freshman or non quality (fcs) OL.
I am done. And, you INDEED, are a troll. Full stop.
-
One correction, the 85 scholarship limit is obsolete now. Schools can have kids walk-on with NIL cover the cost of a scholarship.
-
delete
-
WTF… WDWHA I guess.
How do you go from a top 100 to this?
-
so top 100 in TX, oops.
-
Could immediately start, put up stats, then portal to P2/4 school next year, like Sam Huard
-
You don't pass up a chance to play on the red turf of Cheney stadium or whatever they call it.
James was always a questionable tweener type. He was slow for a rush end or OLB and small for a tackle. Our old friend @roaddawg was first on the anti James wagon iirc. I didn't go a long with him because I doog for recruits, but I didn't argue with him because I knew he was probably right.
-
I believe the red field is called “The Inferno”
-
-
-
-
I like the Scarface reference.
-
-
-
Color me whelmed.
-
too much "last time we had a big sky all conference db transfer in he sucked really bad" imagery.
-
Talking head types might question whether this one “moves the needle.”
-
"The Sacramento Pipeline…"
-
apparently fish’s plan is for a two year rebuild.
-
how does an 8th grader play varsity…
I’m having flashbacks to that one short midget that committed to sark and then decomitted and committed 2 or 3 other places while transferring HS’s 3 or 4 times. Little did we know that what he did would become normal… fuck the kids.
Edit: Tate Martell… also, he’s my height so not a midget. 😆 Also, google his sister Rylee.
-
We should have dropped down to the Big Sky instead of going up to the Big 10. Suck on that Sacramento State.
-
Dammit! is there anyone else from the Sacramento state defense you guys would like to poach?
-
He visited Ohio State and Michigan. Ok.
