The Fisching Report Recruiting Thread Sponsored by The Fisch Bowl
Comments
-
That dude looks like he's 25 years old
-
I’ll be pissed if we lose this one unless I’m missing something.
-
We always lose to Ucla
-
visor on the table!
-
agreed
-
I always thought the Ballmer stuff and using Amazon/MSFT money to buy a class was a long shot at best, but by the time this cycle ends I do think they will be around 20 or so.
People that actually watch tape closely (I don't) thought DeBoer's #32 class was a top 25 class. We're never not going to try and outscout people or rely on taking some guys like Wayne where we let some other school overpay for them first and then they're ready to come back and work.
-
i forgot we picked Wayne back up
This roster is so much better than it's being given credit for
-
My problem is that people are acting like 5-7 or 6-6 isn't even a question.
So after we roll through our soft ooc schedule we only win 2 games? Northwestern, Indiana, UCLA. Iowa is a shittier version of Utah and doesn't have a cake divional schedule anymore. Everyone seems to think USC is soft. Rutgers is better lately but..
It's schedule that practically gifts 7+ wins. These B1G teams don't have as much skill talent as the incoming Pac schools.
-
Yeah, Wayne was a nice little forgotten pickup. I forgot about the DEs/OLBs from Arizona too. I think the spring portal was disappointing so everyone kind of forgot DeBoer actually had some decent pick ups in winter who stayed and a few nice pieces came from Arizona, beyond Coleman and Prysock, who are also being forgotten a bit.
DeBoer's recruiting was underrated and I think he saw through some of the overrating of four star guys, especially out west. It's gonna suck if Austin Mack specifically ends up being great.
-
This roster is going 8-4
