Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This is Lanning's fault

2

Comments

  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Seven_Eleven said:

    If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.

    It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.

    Oregon is always building for the future

    Next years champs

    Lanning has a shot to beat UW now

    Imagine thinking that means something
    It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.

    I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.

    The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.

    I think I'm still right.
    The question for uw fans is this.

    When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?

    Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CrispyEaterson
    CrispyEaterson Member Posts: 787
    46XiJCAB said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Seven_Eleven said:

    If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.

    It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.

    Oregon is always building for the future

    Next years champs

    Lanning has a shot to beat UW now

    Imagine thinking that means something
    It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.

    I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.

    The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.

    I think I'm still right.
    The question for uw fans is this.

    When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?

    Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options.
    Doesn’t matter who we root for because at the end of the day we all know Lanning can’t beat DeBoer.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    RaceBannon said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Seven_Eleven said:

    If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.

    It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.

    Oregon is always building for the future

    Next years champs

    Lanning has a shot to beat UW now

    Imagine thinking that means something
    It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.

    I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.

    The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.

    I think I'm still right.
    The question for uw fans is this.

    When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?

    Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options.
    Fuck off
    You're so broken it's tragic.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Alexis
    Alexis Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,432 Founders Club
    We could actually blame Penix too. If he didn’t come back this year we probably lose 4 games with DMo and we’re ready to run DeBag out of town

    I’m not blaming so don’t twist. Just saying you could.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Postal91
    Postal91 Member Posts: 1,996
    46XiJCAB said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Seven_Eleven said:

    If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.

    It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.

    Oregon is always building for the future

    Next years champs

    Lanning has a shot to beat UW now

    Imagine thinking that means something
    It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.

    I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.

    The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.

    I think I'm still right.
    The question for uw fans is this.

    When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?

    Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options.
    How does Oregon make the playoffs with 3 losses????
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Seven_Eleven
    Seven_Eleven Member Posts: 124
    Postal91 said:

    How does Oregon make the playoffs with 3 losses????

    We probably will start seeing 3 loss teams in the 12 team playoff.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,460 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    RaceBannon said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Seven_Eleven said:

    If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.

    It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.

    Oregon is always building for the future

    Next years champs

    Lanning has a shot to beat UW now

    Imagine thinking that means something
    It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.

    I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.

    The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.

    I think I'm still right.
    The question for uw fans is this.

    When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?

    Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options.
    Fuck off
    You're so broken it's tragic.


    Pussy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    RaceBannon said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RaceBannon said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Seven_Eleven said:

    If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.

    It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.

    Oregon is always building for the future

    Next years champs

    Lanning has a shot to beat UW now

    Imagine thinking that means something
    It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.

    I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.

    The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.

    I think I'm still right.
    The question for uw fans is this.

    When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?

    Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options.
    Fuck off
    You're so broken it's tragic.


    Pussy
    See.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Postal91 said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Seven_Eleven said:

    If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.

    It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.

    Oregon is always building for the future

    Next years champs

    Lanning has a shot to beat UW now

    Imagine thinking that means something
    It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.

    I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.

    The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.

    I think I'm still right.
    The question for uw fans is this.

    When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?

    Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options.
    How does Oregon make the playoffs with 3 losses????
    NGH.

    There are not 3 teams in the B1G beating Oregon next year.

    Oregon or Bama?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter