Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

SEC

2»

Comments

  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,020
    edited November 2023
    creepycoug said:

    SECDAWG said:

    I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

    No. It's true.
    whlinder said:

    SECDAWG said:

    That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

    My bad, pod. Which two you want?

    Pod, you're comparing an N of 12 against an N of 14. There are many statistical ways to do that. My understanding was you wanted to do theoretical head to head matchups. To do that, you can't throw away the bottom 2 SEC. They're part of the conference. Both conferences have shitty teams at the bottom. The SEC doesn't get to exclude theirs just because. Throw away equally weighted teams on both sides of the SEC median.

    Georgia and Vandy both go, or whatever the #7 and #8 "ranked" SEC teams if you want to take teams out of the middle.
    He's not going to understand what "N" means.

    When SEC guys argue, they will always "but still" when you bring up their OOC and road game scheduling habits, and when you bring up the shit tier of their conference, which frankly is usually more than one or two teams. Here's a good example:
    SECDAWG said:

    Forgot about FL. But anyway.

    Not sure that "but anyway" put you away, but he thinks it did.

    And why work that hard? It's not that insulting; it's just a very top heavy conference with usually one or two really good teams with a big drop off from there. Most SEC teams would find the Pac to be a tough go of it more often than not.



    I know what it means. Pick em. Regardless of yer biased.

    NOC.

    This is all gone bode well for you and Miamuh.

    I’ll give ya this, y’all beat ATM. Congratulations.

    Puh
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,307
    SECDAWG said:

    creepycoug said:

    SECDAWG said:

    I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

    No. It's true.
    whlinder said:

    SECDAWG said:

    That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

    My bad, pod. Which two you want?

    Pod, you're comparing an N of 12 against an N of 14. There are many statistical ways to do that. My understanding was you wanted to do theoretical head to head matchups. To do that, you can't throw away the bottom 2 SEC. They're part of the conference. Both conferences have shitty teams at the bottom. The SEC doesn't get to exclude theirs just because. Throw away equally weighted teams on both sides of the SEC median.

    Georgia and Vandy both go, or whatever the #7 and #8 "ranked" SEC teams if you want to take teams out of the middle.
    He's not going to understand what "N" means.

    When SEC guys argue, they will always "but still" when you bring up their OOC and road game scheduling habits, and when you bring up the shit tier of their conference, which frankly is usually more than one or two teams. Here's a good example:
    SECDAWG said:

    Forgot about FL. But anyway.

    Not sure that "but anyway" put you away, but he thinks it did.

    And why work that hard? It's not that insulting; it's just a very top heavy conference with usually one or two really good teams with a big drop off from there. Most SEC teams would find the Pac to be a tough go of it more often than not.



    I know what it means. Pick em. Regardless of yer biased.

    NOC.

    This is all gone bode well for you and Miamuh.

    I’ll give ya this, y’all beat ATM. Congratulations.

    Puh
    Can you hire a translator?

    And, wrong.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,818 Swaye's Wigwam
    creepycoug said:

    SECDAWG said:

    creepycoug said:

    SECDAWG said:

    I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

    No. It's true.
    whlinder said:

    SECDAWG said:

    That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

    My bad, pod. Which two you want?

    Pod, you're comparing an N of 12 against an N of 14. There are many statistical ways to do that. My understanding was you wanted to do theoretical head to head matchups. To do that, you can't throw away the bottom 2 SEC. They're part of the conference. Both conferences have shitty teams at the bottom. The SEC doesn't get to exclude theirs just because. Throw away equally weighted teams on both sides of the SEC median.

    Georgia and Vandy both go, or whatever the #7 and #8 "ranked" SEC teams if you want to take teams out of the middle.
    He's not going to understand what "N" means.

    When SEC guys argue, they will always "but still" when you bring up their OOC and road game scheduling habits, and when you bring up the shit tier of their conference, which frankly is usually more than one or two teams. Here's a good example:
    SECDAWG said:

    Forgot about FL. But anyway.

    Not sure that "but anyway" put you away, but he thinks it did.

    And why work that hard? It's not that insulting; it's just a very top heavy conference with usually one or two really good teams with a big drop off from there. Most SEC teams would find the Pac to be a tough go of it more often than not.



    I know what it means. Pick em. Regardless of yer biased.

    NOC.

    This is all gone bode well for you and Miamuh.

    I’ll give ya this, y’all beat ATM. Congratulations.

    Puh
    Can you hire a translator?

    And, wrong.
    Found it


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,584 Founders Club
    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    One loss PAC 12 team will get leap frogged by Bamma or Georgia. Washington is the dying conferences only hope. But the Refs have been fucking Washington for weeks now. I have a feeling Beav corners will be hold receivers and Trice and ZTF will get held on every down

    SEC wefs protecting Bama against Auburn right now.

    Fuck the Pac12.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter