SEC

RaceBannon

9th ranked Mississippi got boat raced by Bama and Georgia. 8-2


They never had a shot. No one does. It's a two team league with LSU and Florida occasionally getting in there

In the Pac every week is a war every game a battle

No one has been harder on the Pac 12 and pimped the SEC harder than I have but this year the Pac is best

To bad the best Pac-12 team is so horrible

NeGgaPlEaSe

One loss PAC 12 team will get leap frogged by Bamma or Georgia. Washington is the dying conferences only hope. But the Refs have been fucking Washington for weeks now. I have a feeling Beav corners will be hold receivers and Trice and ZTF will get held on every down

creepycoug

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

One loss PAC 12 team will get leap frogged by Bamma or Georgia. Washington is the dying conferences only hope. But the Refs have been fucking Washington for weeks now. I have a feeling Beav corners will be hold receivers and Trice and ZTF will get held on every down

The wefs? I’ve been assured here that the wefs are never the reason for failure.

SECDAWG

I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

whatshouldicareabout

SECDAWG said:

I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

Arizona had the wrong QB play, was -5 in the TO margin, and only lost in OT

Cal sucks and that game with Auburn was cancer

Ute beat Florida, so this year it's 1-2

SECDAWG

Forgot about FL. But anyway. There’s been gaymes. For funsies, I can name my SEC top down to 12 and y’all matchup yalls against em, all speculation of course, and predict the W-L against one another.

whlinder

SECDAWG said:

Forgot about FL. But anyway. There’s been gaymes. For funsies, I can name my SEC top down to 12 and y’all matchup yalls against em, all speculation of course, and predict the W-L against one another.

Oh no, you don’t get to throw out the two shittiest SEC teams.

Either toss the best and the worst or toss the middle 2 teams.

SECDAWG

That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

My bad, pod. Which two you want?

whlinder

SECDAWG said:

That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

My bad, pod. Which two you want?

Pod, you're comparing an N of 12 against an N of 14. There are many statistical ways to do that. My understanding was you wanted to do theoretical head to head matchups. To do that, you can't throw away the bottom 2 SEC. They're part of the conference. Both conferences have shitty teams at the bottom. The SEC doesn't get to exclude theirs just because. Throw away equally weighted teams on both sides of the SEC median.

Georgia and Vandy both go, or whatever the #7 and #8 "ranked" SEC teams if you want to take teams out of the middle.

creepycoug

SECDAWG said:

I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

No. It's true.

whlinder said:

SECDAWG said:

That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

My bad, pod. Which two you want?

Pod, you're comparing an N of 12 against an N of 14. There are many statistical ways to do that. My understanding was you wanted to do theoretical head to head matchups. To do that, you can't throw away the bottom 2 SEC. They're part of the conference. Both conferences have shitty teams at the bottom. The SEC doesn't get to exclude theirs just because. Throw away equally weighted teams on both sides of the SEC median.

Georgia and Vandy both go, or whatever the #7 and #8 "ranked" SEC teams if you want to take teams out of the middle.

He's not going to understand what "N" means.

When SEC guys argue, they will always "but still" when you bring up their OOC and road game scheduling habits, and when you bring up the shit tier of their conference, which frankly is usually more than one or two teams. Here's a good example:

SECDAWG said:

Forgot about FL. But anyway.

Not sure that "but anyway" put you away, but he thinks it did.

And why work that hard? It's not that insulting; it's just a very top heavy conference with usually one or two really good teams with a big drop off from there. Most SEC teams would find the Pac to be a tough go of it more often than not.

PurpleJ

On the other hand, I like the top 2 SEC teams in a BATTLE.

SECDAWG

creepycoug said:

SECDAWG said:

I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

No. It's true.

whlinder said:

SECDAWG said:

That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

My bad, pod. Which two you want?

Pod, you're comparing an N of 12 against an N of 14. There are many statistical ways to do that. My understanding was you wanted to do theoretical head to head matchups. To do that, you can't throw away the bottom 2 SEC. They're part of the conference. Both conferences have shitty teams at the bottom. The SEC doesn't get to exclude theirs just because. Throw away equally weighted teams on both sides of the SEC median.

Georgia and Vandy both go, or whatever the #7 and #8 "ranked" SEC teams if you want to take teams out of the middle.

He's not going to understand what "N" means.

When SEC guys argue, they will always "but still" when you bring up their OOC and road game scheduling habits, and when you bring up the shit tier of their conference, which frankly is usually more than one or two teams. Here's a good example:

SECDAWG said:

Forgot about FL. But anyway.

Not sure that "but anyway" put you away, but he thinks it did.

And why work that hard? It's not that insulting; it's just a very top heavy conference with usually one or two really good teams with a big drop off from there. Most SEC teams would find the Pac to be a tough go of it more often than not.

I know what it means. Pick em. Regardless of yer biased.

NOC.

This is all gone bode well for you and Miamuh.

I’ll give ya this, y’all beat ATM. Congratulations.

Puh

creepycoug

SECDAWG said:

creepycoug said:

SECDAWG said:

I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

No. It's true.

whlinder said:

SECDAWG said:

That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

My bad, pod. Which two you want?

Pod, you're comparing an N of 12 against an N of 14. There are many statistical ways to do that. My understanding was you wanted to do theoretical head to head matchups. To do that, you can't throw away the bottom 2 SEC. They're part of the conference. Both conferences have shitty teams at the bottom. The SEC doesn't get to exclude theirs just because. Throw away equally weighted teams on both sides of the SEC median.

Georgia and Vandy both go, or whatever the #7 and #8 "ranked" SEC teams if you want to take teams out of the middle.

He's not going to understand what "N" means.

When SEC guys argue, they will always "but still" when you bring up their OOC and road game scheduling habits, and when you bring up the shit tier of their conference, which frankly is usually more than one or two teams. Here's a good example:

SECDAWG said:

Forgot about FL. But anyway.

Not sure that "but anyway" put you away, but he thinks it did.

And why work that hard? It's not that insulting; it's just a very top heavy conference with usually one or two really good teams with a big drop off from there. Most SEC teams would find the Pac to be a tough go of it more often than not.

I know what it means. Pick em. Regardless of yer biased.

NOC.

This is all gone bode well for you and Miamuh.

I’ll give ya this, y’all beat ATM. Congratulations.

Puh

Can you hire a translator?

And, wrong.

chuck

creepycoug said:

SECDAWG said:

creepycoug said:

SECDAWG said:

I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

No. It's true.

whlinder said:

SECDAWG said:

That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

My bad, pod. Which two you want?

Pod, you're comparing an N of 12 against an N of 14. There are many statistical ways to do that. My understanding was you wanted to do theoretical head to head matchups. To do that, you can't throw away the bottom 2 SEC. They're part of the conference. Both conferences have shitty teams at the bottom. The SEC doesn't get to exclude theirs just because. Throw away equally weighted teams on both sides of the SEC median.

Georgia and Vandy both go, or whatever the #7 and #8 "ranked" SEC teams if you want to take teams out of the middle.

He's not going to understand what "N" means.

When SEC guys argue, they will always "but still" when you bring up their OOC and road game scheduling habits, and when you bring up the shit tier of their conference, which frankly is usually more than one or two teams. Here's a good example:

SECDAWG said:

Forgot about FL. But anyway.

Not sure that "but anyway" put you away, but he thinks it did.

And why work that hard? It's not that insulting; it's just a very top heavy conference with usually one or two really good teams with a big drop off from there. Most SEC teams would find the Pac to be a tough go of it more often than not.

I know what it means. Pick em. Regardless of yer biased.

NOC.

This is all gone bode well for you and Miamuh.

I’ll give ya this, y’all beat ATM. Congratulations.

Puh

Can you hire a translator?

And, wrong.

Found it

UW_Doog_Bot

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

One loss PAC 12 team will get leap frogged by Bamma or Georgia. Washington is the dying conferences only hope. But the Refs have been fucking Washington for weeks now. I have a feeling Beav corners will be hold receivers and Trice and ZTF will get held on every down

SEC wefs protecting Bama against Auburn right now.

Fuck the Pac12.