Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

SEC

RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 97,760
Swaye's Wigwam Ancient Membership 50000 Comments 10,000 Awesomes
9th ranked Mississippi got boat raced by Bama and Georgia. 8-2


They never had a shot. No one does. It's a two team league with LSU and Florida occasionally getting in there

In the Pac every week is a war every game a battle

No one has been harder on the Pac 12 and pimped the SEC harder than I have but this year the Pac is best

To bad the best Pac-12 team is so horrible
JoeEDangerouslyAtomicDawgHuskyJWFireTheJanitorPawgDawgFireCohencreepycougYellowSnowGayThoughtsPurpleJUW_Doog_Bot

Comments

  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,639
    Tenth Anniversary 5,000 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 5000 Comments
    edited November 13
    One loss PAC 12 team will get leap frogged by Bamma or Georgia. Washington is the dying conferences only hope. But the Refs have been fucking Washington for weeks now. I have a feeling Beav corners will be hold receivers and Trice and ZTF will get held on every down
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,323
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes 10000 Comments

    One loss PAC 12 team will get leap frogged by Bamma or Georgia. Washington is the dying conferences only hope. But the Refs have been fucking Washington for weeks now. I have a feeling Beav corners will be hold receivers and Trice and ZTF will get held on every down

    The wefs? I’ve been assured here that the wefs are never the reason for failure.
    ntxduck
  • SECDAWGSECDAWG Member Posts: 4,684
    2,500 Awesomes 1,000 Up Votes 2500 Comments 250 Answers
    edited November 15
    I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,134
    10,000 Awesomes 10,000 Up Votes Ninth Anniversary 10000 Comments
    SECDAWG said:

    I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

    Arizona had the wrong QB play, was -5 in the TO margin, and only lost in OT

    Cal sucks and that game with Auburn was cancer

    Ute beat Florida, so this year it's 1-2
    dirtysouwfdawg
  • SECDAWGSECDAWG Member Posts: 4,684
    2,500 Awesomes 1,000 Up Votes 2500 Comments 250 Answers
    Forgot about FL. But anyway. There’s been gaymes. For funsies, I can name my SEC top down to 12 and y’all matchup yalls against em, all speculation of course, and predict the W-L against one another.
  • whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 3,946
    Standard Supporter Tenth Anniversary 5,000 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes
    SECDAWG said:

    Forgot about FL. But anyway. There’s been gaymes. For funsies, I can name my SEC top down to 12 and y’all matchup yalls against em, all speculation of course, and predict the W-L against one another.

    Oh no, you don’t get to throw out the two shittiest SEC teams.

    Either toss the best and the worst or toss the middle 2 teams.
    creepycoug
  • SECDAWGSECDAWG Member Posts: 4,684
    2,500 Awesomes 1,000 Up Votes 2500 Comments 250 Answers
    That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

    My bad, pod. Which two you want?
  • whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 3,946
    Standard Supporter Tenth Anniversary 5,000 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes
    SECDAWG said:

    That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

    My bad, pod. Which two you want?

    Pod, you're comparing an N of 12 against an N of 14. There are many statistical ways to do that. My understanding was you wanted to do theoretical head to head matchups. To do that, you can't throw away the bottom 2 SEC. They're part of the conference. Both conferences have shitty teams at the bottom. The SEC doesn't get to exclude theirs just because. Throw away equally weighted teams on both sides of the SEC median.

    Georgia and Vandy both go, or whatever the #7 and #8 "ranked" SEC teams if you want to take teams out of the middle.
    creepycoug
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,323
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes 10000 Comments
    edited November 20
    SECDAWG said:

    I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

    No. It's true.
    whlinder said:

    SECDAWG said:

    That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

    My bad, pod. Which two you want?

    Pod, you're comparing an N of 12 against an N of 14. There are many statistical ways to do that. My understanding was you wanted to do theoretical head to head matchups. To do that, you can't throw away the bottom 2 SEC. They're part of the conference. Both conferences have shitty teams at the bottom. The SEC doesn't get to exclude theirs just because. Throw away equally weighted teams on both sides of the SEC median.

    Georgia and Vandy both go, or whatever the #7 and #8 "ranked" SEC teams if you want to take teams out of the middle.
    He's not going to understand what "N" means.

    When SEC guys argue, they will always "but still" when you bring up their OOC and road game scheduling habits, and when you bring up the shit tier of their conference, which frankly is usually more than one or two teams. Here's a good example:
    SECDAWG said:

    Forgot about FL. But anyway.

    Not sure that "but anyway" put you away, but he thinks it did.

    And why work that hard? It's not that insulting; it's just a very top heavy conference with usually one or two really good teams with a big drop off from there. Most SEC teams would find the Pac to be a tough go of it more often than not.



  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,668
    Swaye's Wigwam Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes
    On the other hand, I like the top 2 SEC teams in a BATTLE.
    SECDAWG
  • SECDAWGSECDAWG Member Posts: 4,684
    2,500 Awesomes 1,000 Up Votes 2500 Comments 250 Answers
    edited November 22

    SECDAWG said:

    I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

    No. It's true.
    whlinder said:

    SECDAWG said:

    That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

    My bad, pod. Which two you want?

    Pod, you're comparing an N of 12 against an N of 14. There are many statistical ways to do that. My understanding was you wanted to do theoretical head to head matchups. To do that, you can't throw away the bottom 2 SEC. They're part of the conference. Both conferences have shitty teams at the bottom. The SEC doesn't get to exclude theirs just because. Throw away equally weighted teams on both sides of the SEC median.

    Georgia and Vandy both go, or whatever the #7 and #8 "ranked" SEC teams if you want to take teams out of the middle.
    He's not going to understand what "N" means.

    When SEC guys argue, they will always "but still" when you bring up their OOC and road game scheduling habits, and when you bring up the shit tier of their conference, which frankly is usually more than one or two teams. Here's a good example:
    SECDAWG said:

    Forgot about FL. But anyway.

    Not sure that "but anyway" put you away, but he thinks it did.

    And why work that hard? It's not that insulting; it's just a very top heavy conference with usually one or two really good teams with a big drop off from there. Most SEC teams would find the Pac to be a tough go of it more often than not.



    I know what it means. Pick em. Regardless of yer biased.

    NOC.

    This is all gone bode well for you and Miamuh.

    I’ll give ya this, y’all beat ATM. Congratulations.

    Puh
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,323
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes 10000 Comments
    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

    No. It's true.
    whlinder said:

    SECDAWG said:

    That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

    My bad, pod. Which two you want?

    Pod, you're comparing an N of 12 against an N of 14. There are many statistical ways to do that. My understanding was you wanted to do theoretical head to head matchups. To do that, you can't throw away the bottom 2 SEC. They're part of the conference. Both conferences have shitty teams at the bottom. The SEC doesn't get to exclude theirs just because. Throw away equally weighted teams on both sides of the SEC median.

    Georgia and Vandy both go, or whatever the #7 and #8 "ranked" SEC teams if you want to take teams out of the middle.
    He's not going to understand what "N" means.

    When SEC guys argue, they will always "but still" when you bring up their OOC and road game scheduling habits, and when you bring up the shit tier of their conference, which frankly is usually more than one or two teams. Here's a good example:
    SECDAWG said:

    Forgot about FL. But anyway.

    Not sure that "but anyway" put you away, but he thinks it did.

    And why work that hard? It's not that insulting; it's just a very top heavy conference with usually one or two really good teams with a big drop off from there. Most SEC teams would find the Pac to be a tough go of it more often than not.



    I know what it means. Pick em. Regardless of yer biased.

    NOC.

    This is all gone bode well for you and Miamuh.

    I’ll give ya this, y’all beat ATM. Congratulations.

    Puh
    Can you hire a translator?

    And, wrong.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,154
    Swaye's Wigwam Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    I know @RaceBannon is being @sarktastic, or think so…or hope so. Two bottom SECW bottom dweller teams played PAC this year and we know the results. MS St lost their SEC record setting QB but beat a GOOD AZ team when they had him. First year corch, Freeze, took a new team to Cal(Cal too high) and won. But, proof is in the pudding re “SEC” in the only PAC/SEC this year…so far…perhaps still to be continued 2023-2024.

    No. It's true.
    whlinder said:

    SECDAWG said:

    That a “conference”? Thought we were talking about “conference”?

    My bad, pod. Which two you want?

    Pod, you're comparing an N of 12 against an N of 14. There are many statistical ways to do that. My understanding was you wanted to do theoretical head to head matchups. To do that, you can't throw away the bottom 2 SEC. They're part of the conference. Both conferences have shitty teams at the bottom. The SEC doesn't get to exclude theirs just because. Throw away equally weighted teams on both sides of the SEC median.

    Georgia and Vandy both go, or whatever the #7 and #8 "ranked" SEC teams if you want to take teams out of the middle.
    He's not going to understand what "N" means.

    When SEC guys argue, they will always "but still" when you bring up their OOC and road game scheduling habits, and when you bring up the shit tier of their conference, which frankly is usually more than one or two teams. Here's a good example:
    SECDAWG said:

    Forgot about FL. But anyway.

    Not sure that "but anyway" put you away, but he thinks it did.

    And why work that hard? It's not that insulting; it's just a very top heavy conference with usually one or two really good teams with a big drop off from there. Most SEC teams would find the Pac to be a tough go of it more often than not.



    I know what it means. Pick em. Regardless of yer biased.

    NOC.

    This is all gone bode well for you and Miamuh.

    I’ll give ya this, y’all beat ATM. Congratulations.

    Puh
    Can you hire a translator?

    And, wrong.
    Found it


    1to392831weretaken
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,431
    Swaye's Wigwam 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes 10000 Comments

    One loss PAC 12 team will get leap frogged by Bamma or Georgia. Washington is the dying conferences only hope. But the Refs have been fucking Washington for weeks now. I have a feeling Beav corners will be hold receivers and Trice and ZTF will get held on every down

    SEC wefs protecting Bama against Auburn right now.

    Fuck the Pac12.
    biak1
Sign In or Register to comment.