I hate watching this team
Comments
-
Disagree on Alabama NOT kicking our? nuts in. Not Pat Hill TUFF, they are physical and appear to be gelling, they would give this Husky sqwad fits.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Georgia would obviously kick our nuts in, but Alabama is a retarded inbred version of their former selves.Southerndawg said:This team has a largely one dimensional offense, patty cake lines, and a defense that can't tackle for shit. They somewhat remind me of the 1998 fighting Bob Toledo's at UCLA, except DeShaun Foster.
The 2000 Huskies had a lot of nasty in them (thanks Lambo), they could be physically dominant, even beat one of the most talented college football teams of all time. That is NOT this team. This team has a gunslinger and some very talented wide receivers. When there is pass protection, they are a legitimate threat to pull off a string of big plays and in general they don't quit, good traits. But they're not going to intimidate, physically dominate, grind out the clock, or work over any semi worthy opponent. A team like Alabama or Georgia would likely kick their nuts in. Edit: Even Oregon might kick their nuts in if they play again.
Being Pat Hill TUFF is overrated - see Utah. -
I’m in let it play out mode on which team I hate more. 2000 may have had more nasty on the lines but they had a shit ton of nail biters against shit to mediocre teams. If 2023 can’t win the Pac then we’ll have our answer.Southerndawg said:This team has a largely one dimensional offense, patty cake lines, and a defense that can't tackle for shit. They somewhat remind me of the 1998 fighting Bob Toledo's at UCLA, except DeShaun Foster.
The 2000 Huskies had a lot of nasty in them (thanks Lambo), they could be physically dominant, even beat one of the most talented college football teams of all time. That is NOT this team. This team has a gunslinger and some very talented wide receivers. When there is pass protection, they are a legitimate threat to pull off a string of big plays and in general they don't quit, good traits. But they're not going to intimidate, physically dominate, grind out the clock, or work over any semi worthy opponent. A team like Alabama or Georgia would likely kick their nuts in. Edit: Even Oregon might kick their nuts in if they play again. -
Alabama would out-athlete UW, rather easily.Southerndawg said:
Disagree on Alabama NOT kicking our? nuts in. Not Pat Hill TUFF, they are physical and appear to be gelling, they would give this Husky sqwad fits.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Georgia would obviously kick our nuts in, but Alabama is a retarded inbred version of their former selves.Southerndawg said:This team has a largely one dimensional offense, patty cake lines, and a defense that can't tackle for shit. They somewhat remind me of the 1998 fighting Bob Toledo's at UCLA, except DeShaun Foster.
The 2000 Huskies had a lot of nasty in them (thanks Lambo), they could be physically dominant, even beat one of the most talented college football teams of all time. That is NOT this team. This team has a gunslinger and some very talented wide receivers. When there is pass protection, they are a legitimate threat to pull off a string of big plays and in general they don't quit, good traits. But they're not going to intimidate, physically dominate, grind out the clock, or work over any semi worthy opponent. A team like Alabama or Georgia would likely kick their nuts in. Edit: Even Oregon might kick their nuts in if they play again.
Being Pat Hill TUFF is overrated - see Utah. -
I think any truly physical team is going to kick our nuts in. Do not think that they will at this point, but I think UW gets embarrassed if they made the playoffs.Southerndawg said:
Disagree on Alabama NOT kicking our? nuts in. Not Pat Hill TUFF, they are physical and appear to be gelling, they would give this Husky sqwad fits.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Georgia would obviously kick our nuts in, but Alabama is a retarded inbred version of their former selves.Southerndawg said:This team has a largely one dimensional offense, patty cake lines, and a defense that can't tackle for shit. They somewhat remind me of the 1998 fighting Bob Toledo's at UCLA, except DeShaun Foster.
The 2000 Huskies had a lot of nasty in them (thanks Lambo), they could be physically dominant, even beat one of the most talented college football teams of all time. That is NOT this team. This team has a gunslinger and some very talented wide receivers. When there is pass protection, they are a legitimate threat to pull off a string of big plays and in general they don't quit, good traits. But they're not going to intimidate, physically dominate, grind out the clock, or work over any semi worthy opponent. A team like Alabama or Georgia would likely kick their nuts in. Edit: Even Oregon might kick their nuts in if they play again.
Being Pat Hill TUFF is overrated - see Utah.
We couldn't handle ASU's DLine for fucks sake. -
Agree. But messiah QBs can make things interesting.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Alabama would out-athlete UW, rather easily.Southerndawg said:
Disagree on Alabama NOT kicking our? nuts in. Not Pat Hill TUFF, they are physical and appear to be gelling, they would give this Husky sqwad fits.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Georgia would obviously kick our nuts in, but Alabama is a retarded inbred version of their former selves.Southerndawg said:This team has a largely one dimensional offense, patty cake lines, and a defense that can't tackle for shit. They somewhat remind me of the 1998 fighting Bob Toledo's at UCLA, except DeShaun Foster.
The 2000 Huskies had a lot of nasty in them (thanks Lambo), they could be physically dominant, even beat one of the most talented college football teams of all time. That is NOT this team. This team has a gunslinger and some very talented wide receivers. When there is pass protection, they are a legitimate threat to pull off a string of big plays and in general they don't quit, good traits. But they're not going to intimidate, physically dominate, grind out the clock, or work over any semi worthy opponent. A team like Alabama or Georgia would likely kick their nuts in. Edit: Even Oregon might kick their nuts in if they play again.
Being Pat Hill TUFF is overrated - see Utah. -
Well I love this team, it’s been amazing to watch… but if we are honest, they started the year with a team that we all thought was going to have an improved defense but was clearly going to have to outscore every team we faced, have a gunslinger QB that until the 2nd half of the Oregon game was throwing perfect dimes 80 percent of the time, had 2 pro receivers that in fact turned into 3 with yet another younger player that stepped up Bigly, and a below average running game that required the long ball to establish and maintain vs any opponent not named Portland State.
What has happened since is a slew of injuries to key players with no real depth behind them, including our QB who has continued to play anyway. Everyone on the team, the coaching staff, the teams we are facing and our fans can see the impossible issues with this team and yet they have continued to find a way to believe they can and will win. Its been impressive to watch PAC 12 teams with no pulse come alive with the hope of knocking off the top ranked dawgs and then continue to terrorize the rest of the teams they face in the aftermath of playing the Dawgs.
In the great tradition, as Sammi Sosa said ‘keep it to continue’. Tightrope watching has always been a bitch to watch. -
Maybe this team is ‘97 incarnate. Tons of talent, banged up physically. They’ll finally be healthy for the bowl game and destroy a middling opponent.
-
@DerekJohnson Can we get a fat butt girlfriends board?PurpleReign said:They have no focus, too much pot and thinking of their fat butt girlfriends
-
What's funny is that every team that plays UW "gets right" afterward.
Since playing UW, Arizona has taken USC to double-OT, destroyed ranked Coug, and beaten top-10 Beavis.
Since playing UW, Oregon has outscored two ranked opponents 73-30, including giving the raw plunger to #13 Utah.
Since playing UW, ASU got their first FBS win against the Coug. Rather easily.
Poor WSU keeps being the victim of the UW bump. Watch Stanford run train on them next Saturday.
We(?)'re like that not-very-physical team on everyone's schedule that they think of as a bye, only that weirdly beats them anyway. -
Fat bottomed girls you make 2023 Washington go down.Quietcowskee said:
@DerekJohnson Can we get a fat butt girlfriends board?PurpleReign said:They have no focus, too much pot and thinking of their fat butt girlfriends
