Bob Stooper declares his conference format worthy of a playoff spot...

puppylove_sugarsteel

...because they play 9 conference games and a "10th game" vs a quality non-con opponent which makes it similar to a conference playoff game. He said "most teams pl. only an 8-game schedule then a conference championship..." clearly the pouty lipped soount wasn't talking about the best conference in the land (pac 12), which plays the most difficult 9 - game conference schedule in the country + 1 non-con game vs the best teams in the country (sometimes 2 if you're USC, UCLA, Stanford and traditionally Washington) + a conference championship game (vs the best or 2nd best team in the conference). That's 12 games against the best competition in the country +ONLY 2 cuntcakes.
The 3rd best conference (BIG 10) plays a similar 12 - game schedule (plus 2 cuntcakes)

Stooper must have been referring to the SEC, which plays 8 conference games (4 of which are vs questionable SEC competition) + 4 cuntcakes and a championship game = 5-6 difficult games a year. Stoops was right if referring to the SEC, but needs to look at OU's schedule before making these bullshit comparisons considering the Pac 12 and Big 10 ' s playoff worthy schedules. OU'S schedule to follow:

OKLAHOMA'S 2014 schedule:

LA Tech
@Tulsa
TENNESSEE (a fraction of former self)
@ W. Virginia (similar to playing Cal)
@ TCU (just lost best player on team)
Texas (they stink)
KSU (Worst team since Snyder re-arrived
@‌ISU (will be over in 1st quarter)
Baylor (at home, no defense)
@TT (might be competitive)
Kansas (OU need not show up
OSU (at home, might be competitive)
+ No Conference Championship

Hardly a playoff schedule. Ya still think you don't need a conference championship Stoops? This schedule is comedy. Certain to be 12-0 if Stoops can still coach.

The big12 needs a championship game or they're fucked

Fire_Marshall_Bill

upvoted for cuntcake

AZDuck

I find your conference rah-rah jibber-jabber irritating.

oregonblitzkrieg

This will be a quook post but....fuck Oklahomo. And fuck the CFB establishment that set up the Bama vs Oklahomo game. They could gave the fans the game people wanted to see. Instead they chose a boring as fuck game that would fatten their wallets.

puppylove_sugarsteel

AZDuck said:

I find your conference rah-rah jibber-jabber irritating.

I find your presence here irritating Duck. Win a few rose bowls and a natty then check back squeak

AZDuck

I got my license to pop off right heah

TierbsHsotBoobs

PLSSFS has Cal way too high in this thread.

TTJ

Please to be explaining how the fuck playing at West Virginia is "similar to playing Cal."

allpurpleallgold

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

AZDuck said:

I find your conference rah-rah jibber-jabber irritating.

I find your presence here irritating Duck. Win a few rose bowls and a natty then check back squeak

You should have told him to pump your gas.

oregonblitzkrieg

TTJ said:

Please to be explaining how the fuck playing at West Virginia is "similar to playing Cal."

This. WV was in the title running not too long ago.

biak1

Up voted for soount

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

TTJ said:

Please to be explaining how the fuck playing at West Virginia is "similar to playing Cal."

Playing WVU is more similar to playing UW under Sark. Lots of offense, not too much defense and subject to 2-3 plungers per year.

puppylove_sugarsteel

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

TTJ said:

Please to be explaining how the fuck playing at West Virginia is "similar to playing Cal."

Playing WVU is more similar to playing UW under Sark. Lots of offense, not too much defense and subject to 2-3 plungers per year.

All offense, zero defense....that's WVU TTJ. Now to Nacho. UW (under Sark) and WVU (under Holgersen) are not similar. Under Holt, Sark had a pro - style offense. Polar opposites ding a ling

puppylove_sugarsteel

oregonblitzkrieg said:

TTJ said:

Please to be explaining how the fuck playing at West Virginia is "similar to playing Cal."

This. WV was in the title running not too long ago.

They were in the big East dipshit. See how WVU is doing in big12? Nuff said

Vegasdawg

Who cares what the fuck Stoop's opinion is? Granted, he probably has a low opinion of the PAC 12, after the officials stole the game from him against Oregon awhile back.

oregonblitzkrieg

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

TTJ said:

Please to be explaining how the fuck playing at West Virginia is "similar to playing Cal."

This. WV was in the title running not too long ago.

They were in the big East dipshit.

Is that better or worse than being a boof timer?

PurpleJ

oregonblitzkrieg said:

This will be a quook post but....fuck Oklahomo. And fuck the CFB establishment that set up the Bama vs Oklahomo game. They could gave the fans the game people wanted to see. Instead they chose a boring as fuck game that would fatten their wallets.

You wanted Bama?

TierbsHsotBoobs

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

TTJ said:

Please to be explaining how the fuck playing at West Virginia is "similar to playing Cal."

This. WV was in the title running not too long ago.

They were in the big East dipshit. See how WVU is doing in big12? Nuff said

Baylor won the Big 12 last year, so your argument is fucktarded.

oregonblitzkrieg

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

This will be a quook post but....fuck Oklahomo. And fuck the CFB establishment that set up the Bama vs Oklahomo game. They could gave the fans the game people wanted to see. Instead they chose a boring as fuck game that would fatten their wallets.

You wanted Bama?

Yeah I would rather Oregon play Bama and lose than play a shitty Texas team and plunger them.

puppylove_sugarsteel

Or play Auburn and lose...hee hee

PurpleJ

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

This will be a quook post but....fuck Oklahomo. And fuck the CFB establishment that set up the Bama vs Oklahomo game. They could gave the fans the game people wanted to see. Instead they chose a boring as fuck game that would fatten their wallets.

You wanted Bama?

Yeah I would rather Oregon play Bama and lose than play a shitty Texas team and plunger them.

How would that have even been possible? You guys didn't make BCS last year.

(point I was making with my sarcastic first comment)


Also, Oklahoma beat Alabama. So I fail to see your logic in thinking that was a bad matchup.