Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
It's not over for Cuog!
Comments
-
Shit post.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Beav has sucked for forever and has worse tv ratingsKaepsknee said:
Beavs have a bigger stadium. The Portland market. And a 30 mile straight shot bus ride off of the plane for the road teams. I’d think they would be more attractive than the Cougs objectivelyGrundleStiltzkin said:
Coogs for sure. Don't see it was much with OSU. But I suppose that's where Iowa State is, so there's room.DerekJohnson said:They both truly fit the Big 12 mold, and I mean that sincerely.
Shit poster. -
You’re really gonna be pissed come 2024. And I’m here for it.EwaDawg said:
You, explain to me how taking $200 million out of WSU expenditures over the past 30 -40 years doesn't impact their ability to build facilities or hire competitive coaching. It not a difficult concept. UW and the LA schools paid for WSU (and others) to be able to (kind of) keep up with the big boys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:EwaDawg said:
Yes. Because they have been getting more tv money than they earn.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Bro they beat Oregons ass 4 years in a row with 2 star recruitsEwaDawg said:
They are good only because they are receiving a ridiculously outsized share of media revenue. They have been on food stamps since tv was invented. If they get into any conference they need to receive only a fair share of tv money. Lets see how good they can be consistently when they are actually a fucking underdog.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Cuog has been solid for a decade now with multiple different coaches.WoolleyDoog said:
Will be interesting to see how Coug and Beav do playing in a conference where they don't benefit from no one getting up to play them and overlooking them each week. Utah too.haie said:Both schools should be in the big 12.
I hate the cuogs more than anyone here and even I can acknowledge that if you have some of these other loser schools like Arizona in that have never had anything resembling a football culture, you should throw the poor cuog a bone and get them in at a partial share or something.
Theyd be fine in the Big 12
UW wishes it could've done that.
You ride the short bus, don't you?
Lets see if they drop off when the gravy train ends.
(I am not saying they don't punch above their weight class, I am saying if they didn't receive hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies over 30 or 40 years, they wouldn't have the chance to have the success that they have had in the last ten years).
explain to me how the WSU gravy train allowed them to beat Oregon 4 years in a row, while UW has topped out at 2 when Oregon was fucking awful almost a decade ago in 16 and 17.
If they don't have Pac 12 level facilities, recruiting budgets and coaching then how do they compete at the P12 level? I get that it is a hypothetical but the gravy train ended for a reason. People with the money decided who deserved to have it.
I get it. You are stubborn and lack intellect. Let's see if WSU can repeat the past ten years from say 2028 to 2037?
. -
I can't wait. See you in 2024. You are cascadia cuog, right?Kaepsknee said:
You’re really gonna be pissed come 2024. And I’m here for it.EwaDawg said:
You, explain to me how taking $200 million out of WSU expenditures over the past 30 -40 years doesn't impact their ability to build facilities or hire competitive coaching. It not a difficult concept. UW and the LA schools paid for WSU (and others) to be able to (kind of) keep up with the big boys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:EwaDawg said:
Yes. Because they have been getting more tv money than they earn.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Bro they beat Oregons ass 4 years in a row with 2 star recruitsEwaDawg said:
They are good only because they are receiving a ridiculously outsized share of media revenue. They have been on food stamps since tv was invented. If they get into any conference they need to receive only a fair share of tv money. Lets see how good they can be consistently when they are actually a fucking underdog.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Cuog has been solid for a decade now with multiple different coaches.WoolleyDoog said:
Will be interesting to see how Coug and Beav do playing in a conference where they don't benefit from no one getting up to play them and overlooking them each week. Utah too.haie said:Both schools should be in the big 12.
I hate the cuogs more than anyone here and even I can acknowledge that if you have some of these other loser schools like Arizona in that have never had anything resembling a football culture, you should throw the poor cuog a bone and get them in at a partial share or something.
Theyd be fine in the Big 12
UW wishes it could've done that.
You ride the short bus, don't you?
Lets see if they drop off when the gravy train ends.
(I am not saying they don't punch above their weight class, I am saying if they didn't receive hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies over 30 or 40 years, they wouldn't have the chance to have the success that they have had in the last ten years).
explain to me how the WSU gravy train allowed them to beat Oregon 4 years in a row, while UW has topped out at 2 when Oregon was fucking awful almost a decade ago in 16 and 17.
If they don't have Pac 12 level facilities, recruiting budgets and coaching then how do they compete at the P12 level? I get that it is a hypothetical but the gravy train ended for a reason. People with the money decided who deserved to have it.
I get it. You are stubborn and lack intellect. Let's see if WSU can repeat the past ten years from say 2028 to 2037?
.
(BTW I am waiting to compare 2028 to 2037 vs 2014 to 2023. Your current coach is likely gone to Mich St and Mike Leach ain't walking through that door any time soon.) -
oregon was a subsidized program for 70 years until their 50 year plan to lose a rose bowl panned outEwaDawg said:
You, explain to me how taking $200 million out of WSU expenditures over the past 30 -40 years doesn't impact their ability to build facilities or hire competitive coaching. It not a difficult concept. UW and the LA schools paid for WSU (and others) to be able to (kind of) keep up with the big boys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:EwaDawg said:
Yes. Because they have been getting more tv money than they earn.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Bro they beat Oregons ass 4 years in a row with 2 star recruitsEwaDawg said:
They are good only because they are receiving a ridiculously outsized share of media revenue. They have been on food stamps since tv was invented. If they get into any conference they need to receive only a fair share of tv money. Lets see how good they can be consistently when they are actually a fucking underdog.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Cuog has been solid for a decade now with multiple different coaches.WoolleyDoog said:
Will be interesting to see how Coug and Beav do playing in a conference where they don't benefit from no one getting up to play them and overlooking them each week. Utah too.haie said:Both schools should be in the big 12.
I hate the cuogs more than anyone here and even I can acknowledge that if you have some of these other loser schools like Arizona in that have never had anything resembling a football culture, you should throw the poor cuog a bone and get them in at a partial share or something.
Theyd be fine in the Big 12
UW wishes it could've done that.
You ride the short bus, don't you?
Lets see if they drop off when the gravy train ends.
(I am not saying they don't punch above their weight class, I am saying if they didn't receive hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies over 30 or 40 years, they wouldn't have the chance to have the success that they have had in the last ten years).
explain to me how the WSU gravy train allowed them to beat Oregon 4 years in a row, while UW has topped out at 2 when Oregon was fucking awful almost a decade ago in 16 and 17.
If they don't have Pac 12 level facilities, recruiting budgets and coaching then how do they compete at the P12 level? I get that it is a hypothetical but the gravy train ended for a reason. People with the money decided who deserved to have it.
I get it. You are stubborn and lack intellect. Let's see if WSU can repeat the past ten years from say 2028 to 2037?
.
programs ebb and flow in college sports. which is why these superconferences are dumb.
not everyone can be a winner. and a lot of big time programs are going to feel the impact of a 5th place conference finish more than they ever thought they would
every conference needs lower tier programs to give the big programs wins, or occasionally have a breakthrough moment -
One time, at band camp. . . . . .PostGameOrangeSlices said:
oregon was a subsidized program for 70 years until their 50 year plan to lose a rose bowl panned outEwaDawg said:
You, explain to me how taking $200 million out of WSU expenditures over the past 30 -40 years doesn't impact their ability to build facilities or hire competitive coaching. It not a difficult concept. UW and the LA schools paid for WSU (and others) to be able to (kind of) keep up with the big boys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:EwaDawg said:
Yes. Because they have been getting more tv money than they earn.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Bro they beat Oregons ass 4 years in a row with 2 star recruitsEwaDawg said:
They are good only because they are receiving a ridiculously outsized share of media revenue. They have been on food stamps since tv was invented. If they get into any conference they need to receive only a fair share of tv money. Lets see how good they can be consistently when they are actually a fucking underdog.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Cuog has been solid for a decade now with multiple different coaches.WoolleyDoog said:
Will be interesting to see how Coug and Beav do playing in a conference where they don't benefit from no one getting up to play them and overlooking them each week. Utah too.haie said:Both schools should be in the big 12.
I hate the cuogs more than anyone here and even I can acknowledge that if you have some of these other loser schools like Arizona in that have never had anything resembling a football culture, you should throw the poor cuog a bone and get them in at a partial share or something.
Theyd be fine in the Big 12
UW wishes it could've done that.
You ride the short bus, don't you?
Lets see if they drop off when the gravy train ends.
(I am not saying they don't punch above their weight class, I am saying if they didn't receive hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies over 30 or 40 years, they wouldn't have the chance to have the success that they have had in the last ten years).
explain to me how the WSU gravy train allowed them to beat Oregon 4 years in a row, while UW has topped out at 2 when Oregon was fucking awful almost a decade ago in 16 and 17.
If they don't have Pac 12 level facilities, recruiting budgets and coaching then how do they compete at the P12 level? I get that it is a hypothetical but the gravy train ended for a reason. People with the money decided who deserved to have it.
I get it. You are stubborn and lack intellect. Let's see if WSU can repeat the past ten years from say 2028 to 2037?
.
programs ebb and flow in college sports. which is why these superconferences are dumb.
not everyone can be a winner. and a lot of big time programs are going to feel the impact of a 5th place conference finish more than they ever thought they would
every conference needs lower tier programs to give the big programs wins, or occasionally have a breakthrough moment
[I like WSU and I root for WSU when it doesn't negatively impact UW. However, WSU fans have an innate ability to make me wonder why I do so. Insufferable does not come close. If they, or you, can't see that they had help getting to where they are at then no one can help you (or them)]. -
WDWYEwaDawg said:
One time, at band camp. . . . . .PostGameOrangeSlices said:
oregon was a subsidized program for 70 years until their 50 year plan to lose a rose bowl panned outEwaDawg said:
You, explain to me how taking $200 million out of WSU expenditures over the past 30 -40 years doesn't impact their ability to build facilities or hire competitive coaching. It not a difficult concept. UW and the LA schools paid for WSU (and others) to be able to (kind of) keep up with the big boys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:EwaDawg said:
Yes. Because they have been getting more tv money than they earn.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Bro they beat Oregons ass 4 years in a row with 2 star recruitsEwaDawg said:
They are good only because they are receiving a ridiculously outsized share of media revenue. They have been on food stamps since tv was invented. If they get into any conference they need to receive only a fair share of tv money. Lets see how good they can be consistently when they are actually a fucking underdog.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Cuog has been solid for a decade now with multiple different coaches.WoolleyDoog said:
Will be interesting to see how Coug and Beav do playing in a conference where they don't benefit from no one getting up to play them and overlooking them each week. Utah too.haie said:Both schools should be in the big 12.
I hate the cuogs more than anyone here and even I can acknowledge that if you have some of these other loser schools like Arizona in that have never had anything resembling a football culture, you should throw the poor cuog a bone and get them in at a partial share or something.
Theyd be fine in the Big 12
UW wishes it could've done that.
You ride the short bus, don't you?
Lets see if they drop off when the gravy train ends.
(I am not saying they don't punch above their weight class, I am saying if they didn't receive hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies over 30 or 40 years, they wouldn't have the chance to have the success that they have had in the last ten years).
explain to me how the WSU gravy train allowed them to beat Oregon 4 years in a row, while UW has topped out at 2 when Oregon was fucking awful almost a decade ago in 16 and 17.
If they don't have Pac 12 level facilities, recruiting budgets and coaching then how do they compete at the P12 level? I get that it is a hypothetical but the gravy train ended for a reason. People with the money decided who deserved to have it.
I get it. You are stubborn and lack intellect. Let's see if WSU can repeat the past ten years from say 2028 to 2037?
.
programs ebb and flow in college sports. which is why these superconferences are dumb.
not everyone can be a winner. and a lot of big time programs are going to feel the impact of a 5th place conference finish more than they ever thought they would
every conference needs lower tier programs to give the big programs wins, or occasionally have a breakthrough moment
[I like WSU and I root for WSU when it doesn't negatively impact UW. However, WSU fans have an innate ability to make me wonder why I do so. Insufferable does not come close. If they, or you, can't see that they had help getting to where they are at then no one can help you (or them)]. -
Max Browne seems to be way more concussed than a QB who never saw the field as He.
-
Weekend at Bernie’s 2 — Mike Leach Electric Boogaloo?EwaDawg said:
I can't wait. See you in 2024. You are cascadia cuog, right?Kaepsknee said:
You’re really gonna be pissed come 2024. And I’m here for it.EwaDawg said:
You, explain to me how taking $200 million out of WSU expenditures over the past 30 -40 years doesn't impact their ability to build facilities or hire competitive coaching. It not a difficult concept. UW and the LA schools paid for WSU (and others) to be able to (kind of) keep up with the big boys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:EwaDawg said:
Yes. Because they have been getting more tv money than they earn.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Bro they beat Oregons ass 4 years in a row with 2 star recruitsEwaDawg said:
They are good only because they are receiving a ridiculously outsized share of media revenue. They have been on food stamps since tv was invented. If they get into any conference they need to receive only a fair share of tv money. Lets see how good they can be consistently when they are actually a fucking underdog.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Cuog has been solid for a decade now with multiple different coaches.WoolleyDoog said:
Will be interesting to see how Coug and Beav do playing in a conference where they don't benefit from no one getting up to play them and overlooking them each week. Utah too.haie said:Both schools should be in the big 12.
I hate the cuogs more than anyone here and even I can acknowledge that if you have some of these other loser schools like Arizona in that have never had anything resembling a football culture, you should throw the poor cuog a bone and get them in at a partial share or something.
Theyd be fine in the Big 12
UW wishes it could've done that.
You ride the short bus, don't you?
Lets see if they drop off when the gravy train ends.
(I am not saying they don't punch above their weight class, I am saying if they didn't receive hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies over 30 or 40 years, they wouldn't have the chance to have the success that they have had in the last ten years).
explain to me how the WSU gravy train allowed them to beat Oregon 4 years in a row, while UW has topped out at 2 when Oregon was fucking awful almost a decade ago in 16 and 17.
If they don't have Pac 12 level facilities, recruiting budgets and coaching then how do they compete at the P12 level? I get that it is a hypothetical but the gravy train ended for a reason. People with the money decided who deserved to have it.
I get it. You are stubborn and lack intellect. Let's see if WSU can repeat the past ten years from say 2028 to 2037?
.
(BTW I am waiting to compare 2028 to 2037 vs 2014 to 2023. Your current coach is likely gone to Mich St and Mike Leach ain't walking through that door any time soon.) -
Mike Leach Memorial Bowel between TTU and CUOG will be special and not a dry eye will be had.theknowledge said:
OSU V OSU in a yearly Halloween battle. Full black and orange regalia. Who owns the acronym? Who owns the colors? Couldn’t write a better “rivalry” for the new B12 conference.DerekJohnson said:GrundleStiltzkin said:
Coogs for sure. Don't see it was much with OSU. But I suppose that's where Iowa State is, so there's room.DerekJohnson said:They both truly fit the Big 12 mold, and I mean that sincerely.
Agriculture school. I can totally see an Oklahoma State vs. Oregon State game on TBS on a Friday night in Corvallis...GrundleStiltzkin said:
Coogs for sure. Don't see it was much with OSU. But I suppose that's where Iowa State is, so there's room.DerekJohnson said:They both truly fit the Big 12 mold, and I mean that sincerely.
