MORE States Prepare To REMOVE Trump From 2024 Ballot, They Are CHEATING

DerekJohnson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgQp6xojAek

TurdBomber

81 Million. 'Nuff said.

HHusky

You gals were for strict construction before you were against it.

thechatch

HHusky said:

You gals were for strict construction before you were against it.

You are incapable of having an honest discussion about anything

HHusky

thechatch said:

HHusky said:

You gals were for strict construction before you were against it.

You are incapable of having an honest discussion about anything

Yet I can read the 14th Amendment.

When you’ve lost the Federalist Society, Phyllis, . . .

thechatch

As an aside, I think the dazzler nickname is kind of dumb, so you can dispense with the equally stupid female nicknames, if it’s all the same to you.

HHusky

thechatch said:

As an aside, I think the dazzler nickname is kind of dumb, so you can dispense with the equally stupid female nicknames, if it’s all the same to you.

Fair enough, and definitely an aside.

Now, about the 14th Amendment . . . ?

HHusky

HHusky said:

thechatch said:

As an aside, I think the dazzler nickname is kind of dumb, so you can dispense with the equally stupid female nicknames, if it’s all the same to you.

Fair enough, and definitely an aside.

Now, about the 14th Amendment . . . ?

[crickets]

That's what I thought.

PurpleReign

Don't like Trump the person, but his policies and competency level are light years better than Biden and his administration full of libtards.

HHusky

PurpleReign said:

Don't like Trump the person, but his policies and competency level are light years better than Biden and his administration full of libtards.

Damn shame he’s ineligible under the 14th Amendment then.

Sledog

HHusky said:

PurpleReign said:

Don't like Trump the person, but his policies and competency level are light years better than Biden and his administration full of libtards.

Damn shame he’s ineligible under the 14th Amendment then.

Bullshit.

HHusky

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

PurpleReign said:

Don't like Trump the person, but his policies and competency level are light years better than Biden and his administration full of libtards.

Damn shame he’s ineligible under the 14th Amendment then.

Bullshit.

analytical

finally

Sledog

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

PurpleReign said:

Don't like Trump the person, but his policies and competency level are light years better than Biden and his administration full of libtards.

Damn shame he’s ineligible under the 14th Amendment then.

Bullshit.

analytical

finally

Perfect analogy. Nothing else falls from your mouth.

HHusky

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

PurpleReign said:

Don't like Trump the person, but his policies and competency level are light years better than Biden and his administration full of libtards.

Damn shame he’s ineligible under the 14th Amendment then.

Bullshit.

analytical

finally

Perfect analogy. Nothing else falls from your mouth.

https://deliverypdf.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=753074071124070065010119109127093006010045004048003005075121094087089079095002086029126119017036023013055080071068028075066089045045047076049097084108070089018029088069014095124004069069070069024097006116088006064002017085024111006085106003067005084&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE

RaceBannon

Nice link

HHusky

Daddy’s lost the Federalists.

Sorry, Race.

Condolences, of course.

HHusky

The Sweep and Force of Section Three
172 U. PA. L. REV. (forthcoming 2024) William Baude & Michael Stokes Paulsen


Abstract: Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids holding office by for- mer office holders who then participate in insurrection or rebellion. Because of a range of misperceptions and mistaken assumptions, Section Three’s full legal conse- quences have not been appreciated or enforced. This article corrects those mistakes by setting forth the full sweep and force of Section Three.
First, Section Three remains an enforceable part of the Constitution, not limited to the Civil War, and not effectively repealed by nineteenth century amnesty legislation. Second, Section Three is self-executing, operating as an immediate disqualification from office, without the need for additional action by Congress. It can and should be enforced by every official, state or federal, who judges qualifications. Third, to the extent of any conflict with prior constitutional rules, Section Three repeals, super- sedes, or simply satisfies them. This includes the rules against bills of attainder or ex post facto laws, the Due Process Clause, and even the free speech principles of the First Amendment. Fourth, Section Three covers a broad range of conduct against the authority of the constitutional order, including many instances of indirect participa- tion or support as “aid or comfort.” It covers a broad range of former offices, including the Presidency. And in particular, it disqualifies former President Donald Trump, and potentially many others, because of their participation in the attempted over- throw of the 2020 presidential election.


That yearning for “honest discussion” seems to have been short-lived in Daddy’s flock.

Goduckies

HHusky said:

The Sweep and Force of Section Three
172 U. PA. L. REV. (forthcoming 2024) William Baude & Michael Stokes Paulsen


Abstract: Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids holding office by for- mer office holders who then participate in insurrection or rebellion. Because of a range of misperceptions and mistaken assumptions, Section Three’s full legal conse- quences have not been appreciated or enforced. This article corrects those mistakes by setting forth the full sweep and force of Section Three.
First, Section Three remains an enforceable part of the Constitution, not limited to the Civil War, and not effectively repealed by nineteenth century amnesty legislation. Second, Section Three is self-executing, operating as an immediate disqualification from office, without the need for additional action by Congress. It can and should be enforced by every official, state or federal, who judges qualifications. Third, to the extent of any conflict with prior constitutional rules, Section Three repeals, super- sedes, or simply satisfies them. This includes the rules against bills of attainder or ex post facto laws, the Due Process Clause, and even the free speech principles of the First Amendment. Fourth, Section Three covers a broad range of conduct against the authority of the constitutional order, including many instances of indirect participa- tion or support as “aid or comfort.” It covers a broad range of former offices, including the Presidency. And in particular, it disqualifies former President Donald Trump, and potentially many others, because of their participation in the attempted over- throw of the 2020 presidential election.


That yearning for “honest discussion” seems to have been short-lived in Daddy’s flock.

Telling a group to protest peacefully and patrioticly isn't an insurrection, Turbo.

HHusky

Goduckies said:

HHusky said:

The Sweep and Force of Section Three
172 U. PA. L. REV. (forthcoming 2024) William Baude & Michael Stokes Paulsen


Abstract: Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids holding office by for- mer office holders who then participate in insurrection or rebellion. Because of a range of misperceptions and mistaken assumptions, Section Three’s full legal conse- quences have not been appreciated or enforced. This article corrects those mistakes by setting forth the full sweep and force of Section Three.
First, Section Three remains an enforceable part of the Constitution, not limited to the Civil War, and not effectively repealed by nineteenth century amnesty legislation. Second, Section Three is self-executing, operating as an immediate disqualification from office, without the need for additional action by Congress. It can and should be enforced by every official, state or federal, who judges qualifications. Third, to the extent of any conflict with prior constitutional rules, Section Three repeals, super- sedes, or simply satisfies them. This includes the rules against bills of attainder or ex post facto laws, the Due Process Clause, and even the free speech principles of the First Amendment. Fourth, Section Three covers a broad range of conduct against the authority of the constitutional order, including many instances of indirect participa- tion or support as “aid or comfort.” It covers a broad range of former offices, including the Presidency. And in particular, it disqualifies former President Donald Trump, and potentially many others, because of their participation in the attempted over- throw of the 2020 presidential election.


That yearning for “honest discussion” seems to have been short-lived in Daddy’s flock.

Telling a group to protest peacefully and patrioticly isn't an insurrection, Turbo.

Good luck with that theory of the case.

WestlinnDuck

HHusky said:

Goduckies said:

HHusky said:

The Sweep and Force of Section Three
172 U. PA. L. REV. (forthcoming 2024) William Baude & Michael Stokes Paulsen


Abstract: Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids holding office by for- mer office holders who then participate in insurrection or rebellion. Because of a range of misperceptions and mistaken assumptions, Section Three’s full legal conse- quences have not been appreciated or enforced. This article corrects those mistakes by setting forth the full sweep and force of Section Three.
First, Section Three remains an enforceable part of the Constitution, not limited to the Civil War, and not effectively repealed by nineteenth century amnesty legislation. Second, Section Three is self-executing, operating as an immediate disqualification from office, without the need for additional action by Congress. It can and should be enforced by every official, state or federal, who judges qualifications. Third, to the extent of any conflict with prior constitutional rules, Section Three repeals, super- sedes, or simply satisfies them. This includes the rules against bills of attainder or ex post facto laws, the Due Process Clause, and even the free speech principles of the First Amendment. Fourth, Section Three covers a broad range of conduct against the authority of the constitutional order, including many instances of indirect participa- tion or support as “aid or comfort.” It covers a broad range of former offices, including the Presidency. And in particular, it disqualifies former President Donald Trump, and potentially many others, because of their participation in the attempted over- throw of the 2020 presidential election.


That yearning for “honest discussion” seems to have been short-lived in Daddy’s flock.

Telling a group to protest peacefully and patrioticly isn't an insurrection, Turbo.

Good luck with that theory of the case.

CamelToe actually funded legal support for actual insurrectionists of BLM/antifa who clearly were rioting against constitutional order. And yet she remains as the dazzler's vice-president. Go figure.

HHusky

WestlinnDuck said:

HHusky said:

Goduckies said:

HHusky said:

The Sweep and Force of Section Three
172 U. PA. L. REV. (forthcoming 2024) William Baude & Michael Stokes Paulsen


Abstract: Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids holding office by for- mer office holders who then participate in insurrection or rebellion. Because of a range of misperceptions and mistaken assumptions, Section Three’s full legal conse- quences have not been appreciated or enforced. This article corrects those mistakes by setting forth the full sweep and force of Section Three.
First, Section Three remains an enforceable part of the Constitution, not limited to the Civil War, and not effectively repealed by nineteenth century amnesty legislation. Second, Section Three is self-executing, operating as an immediate disqualification from office, without the need for additional action by Congress. It can and should be enforced by every official, state or federal, who judges qualifications. Third, to the extent of any conflict with prior constitutional rules, Section Three repeals, super- sedes, or simply satisfies them. This includes the rules against bills of attainder or ex post facto laws, the Due Process Clause, and even the free speech principles of the First Amendment. Fourth, Section Three covers a broad range of conduct against the authority of the constitutional order, including many instances of indirect participa- tion or support as “aid or comfort.” It covers a broad range of former offices, including the Presidency. And in particular, it disqualifies former President Donald Trump, and potentially many others, because of their participation in the attempted over- throw of the 2020 presidential election.


That yearning for “honest discussion” seems to have been short-lived in Daddy’s flock.

Telling a group to protest peacefully and patrioticly isn't an insurrection, Turbo.

Good luck with that theory of the case.

CamelToe actually funded legal support for actual insurrectionists of BLM/antifa who clearly were rioting against constitutional order. And yet she remains as the dazzler's vice-president. Go figure.

Great theory.

Back it up.

But you won’t.

It was really nothing more than your reflexive “whataboutism”, as anyone who’s ever read your stuff knows.