Lannbo is TBD. You might be right. Or wrong. LIPO.
But no sane analyst would argue that having more 4/5 stars, in isolation, lowers your odds of winning. See the list of national champions since the inception of the BCS/playoff. But of course coaching and chemistry matter, and did for all of those natty champs.
Penix is the best QB UW has had since, shit, are there any you'd choose to replace him right now if you could? I can't think of any I'd choose over him. Maybe Joe Burrow and his NFL receivers had something to do with LSU winning? And Herbert for "Coach" Meat? How did that work out for them when those chumps left? Maybe we should save the HOF induction for Coach Fats until he has to replace Penix and gets his guyses in there.
Lannbo is TBD. You might be right. Or wrong. LIPO.
But no sane analyst would argue that having more 4/5 stars, in isolation, lowers your odds of winning. See the list of national champions since the inception of the BCS/playoff. But of course coaching and chemistry matter, and did for all of those natty champs.
Penix is the best QB UW has had since, shit, are there any you'd choose to replace him right now if you could? I can't think of any I'd choose over him. Maybe Joe Burrow and his NFL receivers had something to do with LSU winning? And Herbert for "Coach" Meat? How did that work out for them when those chumps left? Maybe we should save the HOF induction for Coach Fats until he has to replace Penix and gets his guyses in there.
Lannbo is TBD. You might be right. Or wrong. LIPO.
But no sane analyst would argue that having more 4/5 stars, in isolation, lowers your odds of winning. See the list of national champions since the inception of the BCS/playoff. But of course coaching and chemistry matter, and did for all of those natty champs.
Penix is the best QB UW has had since, shit, are there any you'd choose to replace him right now if you could? I can't think of any I'd choose over him. Maybe Joe Burrow and his NFL receivers had something to do with LSU winning? And Herbert for "Coach" Meat? How did that work out for them when those chumps left? Maybe we should save the HOF induction for Coach Fats until he has to replace Penix and gets his guyses in there.
But you know all this.
LIPO. Should be fun.
Who said it lowered the odds? I said Oregon should be favored
Lannbo is TBD. You might be right. Or wrong. LIPO.
But no sane analyst would argue that having more 4/5 stars, in isolation, lowers your odds of winning. See the list of national champions since the inception of the BCS/playoff. But of course coaching and chemistry matter, and did for all of those natty champs.
Penix is the best QB UW has had since, shit, are there any you'd choose to replace him right now if you could? I can't think of any I'd choose over him. Maybe Joe Burrow and his NFL receivers had something to do with LSU winning? And Herbert for "Coach" Meat? How did that work out for them when those chumps left? Maybe we should save the HOF induction for Coach Fats until he has to replace Penix and gets his guyses in there.
But you know all this.
LIPO. Should be fun.
Who said it lowered the odds? I said Oregon should be favored
But they aren't
Who is saying that Oregon should be the favorite because it has the most 4/5 stars? Only you as far as I can tell.
"But of course, coaching and chemistry matter."
The odds makers have 1 data point for Oregon (and most odds have Oregon 2nd behind USC, but I digress). Indeed, Lanning shit the bed last year against UW and particularly Oregon State. Nobody thinks talent alone is predictor of winning, but it is a prerequisite for winning it all.
Because of its talent, Oregon has more upside than any team in P12, but coaching and chemistry were not sufficiently strong in 1 season under Lanning to make it the favorite.
It shouldn't be the favorite. 2nd-4th is exactly where my? Ducks should be slotted given what we know.
Lannbo is TBD. You might be right. Or wrong. LIPO.
But no sane analyst would argue that having more 4/5 stars, in isolation, lowers your odds of winning. See the list of national champions since the inception of the BCS/playoff. But of course coaching and chemistry matter, and did for all of those natty champs.
Penix is the best QB UW has had since, shit, are there any you'd choose to replace him right now if you could? I can't think of any I'd choose over him. Maybe Joe Burrow and his NFL receivers had something to do with LSU winning? And Herbert for "Coach" Meat? How did that work out for them when those chumps left? Maybe we should save the HOF induction for Coach Fats until he has to replace Penix and gets his guyses in there.
But you know all this.
LIPO. Should be fun.
Who said it lowered the odds? I said Oregon should be favored
But they aren't
Who is saying that Oregon should be the favorite because it has the most 4/5 stars? Only you as far as I can tell.
"But of course, coaching and chemistry matter."
The odds makers have 1 data point for Oregon (and most odds have Oregon 2nd behind USC, but I digress). Indeed, Lanning shit the bed last year against UW and particularly Oregon State. Nobody thinks talent alone is predictor of winning, but it is a prerequisite for winning it all.
Because of its talent, Oregon has more upside than any team in P12, but coaching and chemistry were not sufficiently strong in 1 season under Lanning to make it the favorite.
It shouldn't be the favorite. 2nd-4th is exactly where my? Ducks should be slotted given what we know.
Lannbo is TBD. You might be right. Or wrong. LIPO.
But no sane analyst would argue that having more 4/5 stars, in isolation, lowers your odds of winning. See the list of national champions since the inception of the BCS/playoff. But of course coaching and chemistry matter, and did for all of those natty champs.
Penix is the best QB UW has had since, shit, are there any you'd choose to replace him right now if you could? I can't think of any I'd choose over him. Maybe Joe Burrow and his NFL receivers had something to do with LSU winning? And Herbert for "Coach" Meat? How did that work out for them when those chumps left? Maybe we should save the HOF induction for Coach Fats until he has to replace Penix and gets his guyses in there.
Lannbo is TBD. You might be right. Or wrong. LIPO.
But no sane analyst would argue that having more 4/5 stars, in isolation, lowers your odds of winning. See the list of national champions since the inception of the BCS/playoff. But of course coaching and chemistry matter, and did for all of those natty champs.
Penix is the best QB UW has had since, shit, are there any you'd choose to replace him right now if you could? I can't think of any I'd choose over him. Maybe Joe Burrow and his NFL receivers had something to do with LSU winning? And Herbert for "Coach" Meat? How did that work out for them when those chumps left? Maybe we should save the HOF induction for Coach Fats until he has to replace Penix and gets his guyses in there.
But you know all this.
LIPO. Should be fun.
Who said it lowered the odds? I said Oregon should be favored
But they aren't
Who is saying that Oregon should be the favorite because it has the most 4/5 stars? Only you as far as I can tell.
"But of course, coaching and chemistry matter."
The odds makers have 1 data point for Oregon (and most odds have Oregon 2nd behind USC, but I digress). Indeed, Lanning shit the bed last year against UW and particularly Oregon State. Nobody thinks talent alone is predictor of winning, but it is a prerequisite for winning it all.
Because of its talent, Oregon has more upside than any team in P12, but coaching and chemistry were not sufficiently strong in 1 season under Lanning to make it the favorite.
It shouldn't be the favorite. 2nd-4th is exactly where my? Ducks should be slotted given what we know.
LIPO.
46 has been blathering that for months
Hope this helps
And too long didn't read
Shocking that dumb dumb still doesn’t get Smart’s point. He thinks 90-11 besting the rookie HC by 3, because he shit the bed, proves his point?
Lannbo is TBD. You might be right. Or wrong. LIPO.
But no sane analyst would argue that having more 4/5 stars, in isolation, lowers your odds of winning. See the list of national champions since the inception of the BCS/playoff. But of course coaching and chemistry matter, and did for all of those natty champs.
Penix is the best QB UW has had since, shit, are there any you'd choose to replace him right now if you could? I can't think of any I'd choose over him. Maybe Joe Burrow and his NFL receivers had something to do with LSU winning? And Herbert for "Coach" Meat? How did that work out for them when those chumps left? Maybe we should save the HOF induction for Coach Fats until he has to replace Penix and gets his guyses in there.
But you know all this.
LIPO. Should be fun.
Just stop. 90-11 is gonna be just fine when his two NFL WR’s, OL’s and QB are gone. He runs a plug and play system. Belichick like.
Part of the issue is that Oregon is playing UW and Utah on the road while USC and UW both get 2 of their 3 major conference opponents at home. Given how close these three teams are, that could tip the scale.
Comments
Lanning is just getting started. He pissed two games away. It’s not like he lost to UCLA and ASU.
Are we done here, idiots?
Lots of shit talking after going 1-0 against Ducks.
'Fuck Yeah'
Phil hired a Keg Boy and loved the Apple TV deal, but all is right in Shitgene..
You know I'm right about Lannbo
But no sane analyst would argue that having more 4/5 stars, in isolation, lowers your odds of winning. See the list of national champions since the inception of the BCS/playoff. But of course coaching and chemistry matter, and did for all of those natty champs.
Penix is the best QB UW has had since, shit, are there any you'd choose to replace him right now if you could? I can't think of any I'd choose over him. Maybe Joe Burrow and his NFL receivers had something to do with LSU winning? And Herbert for "Coach" Meat? How did that work out for them when those chumps left? Maybe we should save the HOF induction for Coach Fats until he has to replace Penix and gets his guyses in there.
But you know all this.
LIPO. Should be fun.
But they aren't
"But of course, coaching and chemistry matter."
The odds makers have 1 data point for Oregon (and most odds have Oregon 2nd behind USC, but I digress). Indeed, Lanning shit the bed last year against UW and particularly Oregon State. Nobody thinks talent alone is predictor of winning, but it is a prerequisite for winning it all.
Because of its talent, Oregon has more upside than any team in P12, but coaching and chemistry were not sufficiently strong in 1 season under Lanning to make it the favorite.
It shouldn't be the favorite. 2nd-4th is exactly where my? Ducks should be slotted given what we know.
LIPO.
Hope this helps
And too long didn't read
Oh wait!
Not upset
Is there a prize?
HTH.