Third -- New States of convenient size not exceeding four in number, in addition to said State of Texas and having sufficient population, may, hereafter by the consent of said State, be formed out of the territory thereof, which shall be entitled to admission under the provisions of the Federal Constitution; and such states as may be formed out of the territory lying south of thirty-six degrees thirty minutes north latitude, commonly known as the Missouri Compromise Line, shall be admitted into the Union, with or without slavery, as the people of each State, asking admission shall desire; and in such State or States as shall be formed out of said territory, north of said Missouri Compromise Line, slavery, or involuntary servitude (except for crime) shall be prohibited
I like that Western California is south of Central California. And that Southern California is east of Western California. And who needs 6 Californias, what the fuck?
Also, I was going to say it's against the constitution for a state to be created within the territory of another state (with the only exceptions being Maine before the provision was approved in the constitution and West Virginia during the Civil War since Virginia was in the CSA) and the wiki link on the 6 Californias already mentions it in the opening paragraph (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Four_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clause_1:_New_states).
Comments
Also, I was going to say it's against the constitution for a state to be created within the territory of another state (with the only exceptions being Maine before the provision was approved in the constitution and West Virginia during the Civil War since Virginia was in the CSA) and the wiki link on the 6 Californias already mentions it in the opening paragraph (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Four_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clause_1:_New_states).