There might be a point if the vaxx's didn't have significant side effects and a very limited effectiveness. The people who made the decision was the highly incompetent medical bureaucrats who lied about the vaxx's to Team Dazzler, are still lying and Team Dazzler is still swallowing.
There might be a point if the vaxx's didn't have significant side effects and a very limited effectiveness. The people who made the decision was the highly incompetent medical bureaucrats who lied about the vaxx's to Team Dazzler, are still lying and Team Dazzler is still swallowing.
Where we are at now, you might as well be denying healthcare for wearing a backwards hat on Wednesday's, as that has just as much utility to society as these shitty vaccines do. The vaccines are just a marker for heterodoxy, that was obvious by about June 2021.
Imagine falling for the false equivalency of saying healthcare is a right vs arguing healthcare shouldn't be denied because you refused an experimental vaccine
There might be a point if the vaxx's didn't have significant side effects and a very limited effectiveness. The people who made the decision was the highly incompetent medical bureaucrats who lied about the vaxx's to Team Dazzler, are still lying and Team Dazzler is still swallowing.
Where we are at now, you might as well be denying healthcare for wearing a backwards hat on Wednesday's, as that has just as much utility to society as these shitty vaccines do. The vaccines are just a marker for heterodoxy, that was obvious by about June 2021.
Imagine falling for the false equivalency of saying healthcare is a right vs arguing healthcare shouldn't be denied because you refused an experimental vaccine
“This is not the first time medical judgments about allocation of scarce resources have been made in the face of competing needs,” the court wrote. “While such decisions are doubtless exceedingly difficult, they nevertheless must be made.”
“In this case, the charter does not apply to the (doctors’) exercise of clinical judgments in formulating pre-conditions to organ transplant, including requiring vaccination against COVID-19 in the wake of the pandemic.”
“We are not persuaded this court can, or ought to, interfere with generalized medical judgments or individualized clinical assessments involving Ms. Lewis’ standard of care,” it concluded. “While Ms Lewis has the right to refuse to be vaccinated against COVID-19, the charter cannot remediate the consequences of her choice.”
There might be a point if the vaxx's didn't have significant side effects and a very limited effectiveness. The people who made the decision was the highly incompetent medical bureaucrats who lied about the vaxx's to Team Dazzler, are still lying and Team Dazzler is still swallowing.
Where we are at now, you might as well be denying healthcare for wearing a backwards hat on Wednesday's, as that has just as much utility to society as these shitty vaccines do. The vaccines are just a marker for heterodoxy, that was obvious by about June 2021.
Comments
Looks like the death panel worked.
It's really only the consequences that you hate.
Fascist gonna fascist, I guess.
Good luck the rest of the way, Comrade.
Where we are at now, you might as well be denying healthcare for wearing a backwards hat on Wednesday's, as that has just as much utility to society as these shitty vaccines do. The vaccines are just a marker for heterodoxy, that was obvious by about June 2021.
“In this case, the charter does not apply to the (doctors’) exercise of clinical judgments in formulating pre-conditions to organ transplant, including requiring vaccination against COVID-19 in the wake of the pandemic.”
“We are not persuaded this court can, or ought to, interfere with generalized medical judgments or individualized clinical assessments involving Ms. Lewis’ standard of care,” it concluded. “While Ms Lewis has the right to refuse to be vaccinated against COVID-19, the charter cannot remediate the consequences of her choice.”