I now find pessimism annoying

Gladstone

Pity Washington has a fumbling problem.

Tequilla

Gladstone said:

Pity Washington has a fumbling problem.

So did Sankey as a frosh (see @ Nebraska) ... what's your point?

RoadDawg55

Tequilla said:

Gladstone said:

Pity Washington has a fumbling problem.

So did Sankey as a frosh (see @ Nebraska) ... what's your point?

Agree. It was one game and 99% of RB's would have fumbled when he got bent in half. Saying he has a fumbling problem is jumping to conclusions. We haven't seen enough of him to know.

Gladstone

My first whoooooooooosh, yay.

Mad_Son

I have always found optimism and pessimism to be annoying. I just like being realistic. Right now the people who don't expect things from Petersen aren't being realistic. Sure, it is possible he will be a bust but that is NOT the most likely scenario based on his track record and the resources of Washington.

Tequilla

Gladstone said:

My first whoooooooooosh, yay.

I was whooshing back ...

I don't get those that say that Washington had fumbling problems last year. He sucked against Illinois with them. It sucks. But so be it. You tend to learn best from your mistakes. My guess is that he won't have problems going forward. Nor did Sankey after his gaffe at Nebraska on the kickoff. Shit happens.

dnc

Tequilla said:

Gladstone said:

My first whoooooooooosh, yay.

I was whooshing back ...

I don't get those that say that Washington had fumbling problems last year. He sucked against Illinois with them. It sucks. But so be it. You tend to learn best from your mistakes. My guess is that he won't have problems going forward. Nor did Sankey after his gaffe at Nebraska on the kickoff. Shit happens.

disagree.

But agree with the unboalded part.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

RoadDawg55 said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

In my minds eye (Hi Hugh Millen) I have the next 5 years going like this for Peterman:

10-3
9-3
10-2
11-1
12-0

Sorry, I'm doogin now. I'll stop.

On paper now, 2015 looks to be a shitshow.

It's early, but I don't think it will be that bad. I think we will be better than most think in 2015.

I agree. Petersen will have had almost two years to prepare for it. Had Sark stayed, I'd be worried about a 6-6 type season, but he's $C's problem now.

Tequilla

dnc said:

Tequilla said:

Gladstone said:

My first whoooooooooosh, yay.

I was whooshing back ...

I don't get those that say that Washington had fumbling problems last year. He sucked against Illinois with them. It sucks. But so be it. You tend to learn best from your mistakes. My guess is that he won't have problems going forward. Nor did Sankey after his gaffe at Nebraska on the kickoff. Shit happens.

disagree.

But agree with the unboalded part.

It was a poorly worded whoosh (definitely not my best effort), but the only person that had a problem with Washington's fumbling was Sark because it threatened to cost him his trip back to SC.

dnc

Tequilla said:

dnc said:

Tequilla said:

Gladstone said:

My first whoooooooooosh, yay.

I was whooshing back ...

I don't get those that say that Washington had fumbling problems last year. He sucked against Illinois with them. It sucks. But so be it. You tend to learn best from your mistakes. My guess is that he won't have problems going forward. Nor did Sankey after his gaffe at Nebraska on the kickoff. Shit happens.

disagree.

But agree with the unboalded part.

It was a poorly worded whoosh (definitely not my best effort), but the only person that had a problem with Washington's fumbling was Sark because it threatened to cost him his trip back to SC.

There are a few poasters around here who agreed with Sloppy Seven.

allpurpleallgold

Auburndawg said:

DeepSeaZ said:

Please stick to the 5 reasons format of having only 5 reasons. And mention Oasai.

Auburndawg is not responsible for the 5 reasons.

Auburndawg is responsible for the following:

"Staff, true!?"
The Iron Laws
PAC-10/12 PowerRankings

Disagree. That was Sven.

Swaye

Iron Laws.

/giggle

TierbsHsotBoobs

This is the greatest Lather, Rinse, Repeat thread in the history of everything.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Blackie said:

Auburndawg said:

DeepSeaZ said:

Please stick to the 5 reasons format of having only 5 reasons. And mention Oasai.

Auburndawg is not responsible for the 5 reasons.

Auburndawg is responsible for the following:

"Staff, true!?"
The Iron Laws
PAC-10/12 PowerRankings

And another thing Auburndawg is responsible for:

http://washingtonstate.scout.com/2/574158.html

MY MAILBAG was filled to the brim with absolute gems from my favorite Husky fans this week. "Your worst nightmares have just been realized: Washington is awesome again," came from Dave in Auburn.

That was an awesome column except for this #OldManMusicFriday bit:

Pearl Jam is awesome.

AlCzervik

That is not entirely true. Many years I have looked at our on-paper talent, and said we were going to finally turn it around, but bad coaching (or a ton of injuries in 2012) caused us to underachieve.

This team now has everything it needs to win big - including a great coach

No.

It's been every year.

pawz

dnc said:

Tequilla said:

dnc said:

Tequilla said:

Gladstone said:

My first whoooooooooosh, yay.

I was whooshing back ...

I don't get those that say that Washington had fumbling problems last year. He sucked against Illinois with them. It sucks. But so be it. You tend to learn best from your mistakes. My guess is that he won't have problems going forward. Nor did Sankey after his gaffe at Nebraska on the kickoff. Shit happens.

disagree.

But agree with the unboalded part.

It was a poorly worded whoosh (definitely not my best effort), but the only person that had a problem with Washington's fumbling was Sark because it threatened to cost him his trip back to SC.

There are a few poasters around here who agreed with Sloppy Sven.

More_than_a_few, Senator.