Stats are for losers like

YellowSnow

Like the Oregon Ducks



http://mcubed.net/ncaaf/tvc/wa/big10.shtml



http://mcubed.net/ncaaf/tvc/or/big10.shtml

greenblood

Well fuck, had Oregon played Purdue 10 times as well, it would be pretty damn close. Mostly kidding

But yeah, all-time isn’t the best comparison when it comes to Oregon. That’s only because they can’t hide the post Casanova to the start of the Bellotti years. 1967-1995. Oregon only had 7 above .500 seasons with only three seasons of over 6 wins during that span. Imagine having a Gilby/Ty love child of 3-6 win seasons for nearly 30 years straight. Thank god I wasn’t alive or old enough to follow most of these years. That’s nearly 30 years of hell right there.

dtd

The difference a field goal a game makes over 100 years. UW plays defense.

Hippopeteamus

Kinda misleading with respect to Nebraska, since it apparently does not include their non-big 10 years. However, I will say it is a good thing we never have to face Chicago! I don't think we would be ready for the Straussian subterfuge if we were to face them again.

AtomicDawg

We always lose to Indiana.

Joey

AtomicDawg said:

We always lose to Indiana.

And Chicago

haie

Eh.

UW got stomped out by Michigan and Oregon beat Ohio State in the shoe. We had Jimmy and Donovan, but still.

Destroying Michigan State was nice.

Both NW teams will do well overall in the new conference.

UCLA will suck and SC I can't really tell although I have a feeling they won't live up to their expectations with Riley.

AtomicDawg

JoeEDangerously said:

AtomicDawg said:

We always lose to Indiana.

And Chicago

DeBoer never had to face a Lee Corso coached Indiana team.

RaceBannon

AtomicDawg said:

JoeEDangerously said:

AtomicDawg said:

We always lose to Indiana.

And Chicago

DeBoer never had to face a Lee Corso coached Indiana team.

Imagine being 2-0 against Don James