Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Oregon scared of a little competition

BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,575
edited July 2023 in Hardcore Husky Board
https://www.si.com/college/stanford/football/two-pac-12-programs-currently-not-on-board-with-conference-expansion

Both programs resided in prominent markets, and both are viewed as having potential to eventually compete in the Pac-12. Them joining the Pac-12 is something that has been seen as inevitable, but according to a report by The Athletic, not every team in the conference is on board with adding any more members.

Stewart Mandel explained that the belief is the programs do not want any more competition within the conference, so when the expanded playoff comes around and automatic bids are given to the conference champ there's less teams to compete with. He also revealed that one of the teams that is believed to be against expansion is Oregon.
«1

Comments

  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,900 Swaye's Wigwam
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    Why should Washington share revenue with Oregon and Utah?
    Why should Oregon share revenue with washington and Utah?
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,759 Swaye's Wigwam
    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    SDSU made more money from the NCAA tournament this year than the entire Pac-12
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,900 Swaye's Wigwam
    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    Why should Washington share revenue with Oregon and Utah?
    Why should Oregon share revenue with washington and Utah?
    What revenue do they have to share? Eugene Sven bucks?
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    SDSU made more money from the NCAA tournament this year than the entire Pac-12
    Football is the only thing that matters. They play in a 35K stadium. Martin stadium south. Now if we’re talking a straight up trade then yes.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,464 Founders Club
    edited July 2023
    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    This will be bad for my brand but I stand with @46XiJCAB . Adding the scrubs does nothing to help Oregon or Washington.

    And if we’re calling balls and strikes, the Ducks did bring in more AD revenue in 2022 than us @haie
    https://247sports.com/college/oregon/article/oregon-ducks-football-revenue-sharing-expenses-pac-12-conference--211577015/amp/

    Alas, these faggy White Wakanda IPAs are killing my brain cells and making the Stockholm syndrome worse.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,900 Swaye's Wigwam

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    This will be bad for my brand but I stand with @46XiJCAB . Adding the scrubs does nothing to help Oregon or Washington.

    And if we’re calling balls and strikes, the Ducks did bring in more AD revenue in 2022 than us @haie
    https://247sports.com/college/oregon/article/oregon-ducks-football-revenue-sharing-expenses-pac-12-conference--211577015/amp/

    Alas, these faggy White Wakanda IPAs are killing my brain cells and making the Stockholm syndrome worse.
    Oregon hosted everyone this year. Including Washington and Utah.

    Next year, their schedule sucks outside of USC.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,464 Founders Club
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    This will be bad for my brand but I stand with @46XiJCAB . Adding the scrubs does nothing to help Oregon or Washington.

    And if we’re calling balls and strikes, the Ducks did bring in more AD revenue in 2022 than us @haie
    https://247sports.com/college/oregon/article/oregon-ducks-football-revenue-sharing-expenses-pac-12-conference--211577015/amp/

    Alas, these faggy White Wakanda IPAs are killing my brain cells and making the Stockholm syndrome worse.
    Oregon hosted everyone this year. Including Washington and Utah.

    Next year, their schedule sucks outside of USC.
    Like I said. I’m drinking.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,900 Swaye's Wigwam

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    This will be bad for my brand but I stand with @46XiJCAB . Adding the scrubs does nothing to help Oregon or Washington.

    And if we’re calling balls and strikes, the Ducks did bring in more AD revenue in 2022 than us @haie
    https://247sports.com/college/oregon/article/oregon-ducks-football-revenue-sharing-expenses-pac-12-conference--211577015/amp/

    Alas, these faggy White Wakanda IPAs are killing my brain cells and making the Stockholm syndrome worse.
    Oregon hosted everyone this year. Including Washington and Utah.

    Next year, their schedule sucks outside of USC.
    Like I said. I’m drinking.
    So am I.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited July 2023
    Oregon $153M
    uw $145M

    Haie, why does Oregon have to revenue share with schools like uw that finished in the red?

    Swap uw for sc.
    OSU at home.
    The Buffs with Sanders will offset Utah.
    Throw in wsu and Cal.
    I think Oregon is gonna be alright.

    Another miss by Haie.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,900 Swaye's Wigwam
    46XiJCAB said:

    Oregon $153M
    uw $145M

    Haie, why does Oregon have to revenue share with schools like uw that finished in the red?

    Swap uw for sc.
    OSU at home.
    The Buffs with Sanders will offset Utah.
    Throw in wsu and Cal.
    I think Oregon is gonna be alright.

    Another miss by Haie.

    Another "miss" by me.

    Last year was Oregon's big year to get everyone at home.

    UW's best home game last year was Beavlet on a Friday.

    Again, branding, academics, history, most recent year of football, why should UW give a shit about Oregon?
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Oregon $153M
    uw $145M

    Haie, why does Oregon have to revenue share with schools like uw that finished in the red?

    Swap uw for sc.
    OSU at home.
    The Buffs with Sanders will offset Utah.
    Throw in wsu and Cal.
    I think Oregon is gonna be alright.

    Another miss by Haie.

    Another "miss" by me.

    Last year was Oregon's big year to get everyone at home.

    UW's best home game last year was Beavlet on a Friday.

    Again, branding, academics, history, most recent year of football, why should UW give a shit about Oregon?
    Is someone asking them to?

    Your Athletic Dept. is in the red.

    After going 11-2.

    Branding and academics!

    LOL…..
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,900 Swaye's Wigwam
    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Oregon $153M
    uw $145M

    Haie, why does Oregon have to revenue share with schools like uw that finished in the red?

    Swap uw for sc.
    OSU at home.
    The Buffs with Sanders will offset Utah.
    Throw in wsu and Cal.
    I think Oregon is gonna be alright.

    Another miss by Haie.

    Another "miss" by me.

    Last year was Oregon's big year to get everyone at home.

    UW's best home game last year was Beavlet on a Friday.

    Again, branding, academics, history, most recent year of football, why should UW give a shit about Oregon?
    Is someone asking them to?

    Your Athletic Dept. is in the red.

    After going 11-2.

    Branding and academics!

    LOL…..
    Thank you for proving my point.

    I can get back to drinking and don't have to converse with a poor for the rest of the night.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Just for Haie.

    MSU attendance 68K
    OSU attendance 62K. Your “best home game,”

    Pathetic.
  • rodmansragerodmansrage Member Posts: 6,269
    Why would oregon (or us? for that matter) when those schools join? gonna take a while for sdsu or whoever to get their guys in there, by then, we be gone.
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,760 Swaye's Wigwam
    Utah, TCU, Baylor were G5 teams that are now carrying their weight in their conferences. If SDSU is prepared to spend and support then it's no different
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 5,732
    Canadawg said:

    Utah, TCU, Baylor were G5 teams that are now carrying their weight in their conferences. If SDSU is prepared to spend and support then it's no different

    Baylor wasn’t a g5 team
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,760 Swaye's Wigwam
    ntxduck said:

    Canadawg said:

    Utah, TCU, Baylor were G5 teams that are now carrying their weight in their conferences. If SDSU is prepared to spend and support then it's no different

    Baylor wasn’t a g5 team
    Oh well I hope a Baylor fan stumbles upon this then
Sign In or Register to comment.