Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Oregon scared of a little competition

BleachedAnusDawg
BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,740 Standard Supporter
edited July 2023 in Hardcore Husky Board
https://www.si.com/college/stanford/football/two-pac-12-programs-currently-not-on-board-with-conference-expansion

Both programs resided in prominent markets, and both are viewed as having potential to eventually compete in the Pac-12. Them joining the Pac-12 is something that has been seen as inevitable, but according to a report by The Athletic, not every team in the conference is on board with adding any more members.

Stewart Mandel explained that the belief is the programs do not want any more competition within the conference, so when the expanded playoff comes around and automatic bids are given to the conference champ there's less teams to compete with. He also revealed that one of the teams that is believed to be against expansion is Oregon.
«13

Comments

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,453 Founders Club
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    Why should Washington share revenue with Oregon and Utah?
    Why should Oregon share revenue with washington and Utah?
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,014
    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    SDSU made more money from the NCAA tournament this year than the entire Pac-12
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,453 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    Why should Washington share revenue with Oregon and Utah?
    Why should Oregon share revenue with washington and Utah?
    What revenue do they have to share? Eugene Sven bucks?
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    SDSU made more money from the NCAA tournament this year than the entire Pac-12
    Football is the only thing that matters. They play in a 35K stadium. Martin stadium south. Now if we’re talking a straight up trade then yes.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,709 Founders Club
    edited July 2023
    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    This will be bad for my brand but I stand with @46XiJCAB . Adding the scrubs does nothing to help Oregon or Washington.

    And if we’re calling balls and strikes, the Ducks did bring in more AD revenue in 2022 than us @haie
    https://247sports.com/college/oregon/article/oregon-ducks-football-revenue-sharing-expenses-pac-12-conference--211577015/amp/

    Alas, these faggy White Wakanda IPAs are killing my brain cells and making the Stockholm syndrome worse.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,453 Founders Club

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    This will be bad for my brand but I stand with @46XiJCAB . Adding the scrubs does nothing to help Oregon or Washington.

    And if we’re calling balls and strikes, the Ducks did bring in more AD revenue in 2022 than us @haie
    https://247sports.com/college/oregon/article/oregon-ducks-football-revenue-sharing-expenses-pac-12-conference--211577015/amp/

    Alas, these faggy White Wakanda IPAs are killing my brain cells and making the Stockholm syndrome worse.
    Oregon hosted everyone this year. Including Washington and Utah.

    Next year, their schedule sucks outside of USC.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,709 Founders Club
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    This will be bad for my brand but I stand with @46XiJCAB . Adding the scrubs does nothing to help Oregon or Washington.

    And if we’re calling balls and strikes, the Ducks did bring in more AD revenue in 2022 than us @haie
    https://247sports.com/college/oregon/article/oregon-ducks-football-revenue-sharing-expenses-pac-12-conference--211577015/amp/

    Alas, these faggy White Wakanda IPAs are killing my brain cells and making the Stockholm syndrome worse.
    Oregon hosted everyone this year. Including Washington and Utah.

    Next year, their schedule sucks outside of USC.
    Like I said. I’m drinking.