Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Lawsuits incoming

jecorneljecornel Member Posts: 9,727
edited June 2023 in Tug Tavern
Can’t wait for the radical left to thumbs down.

· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,562
    edited June 2023
    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,370
    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Fuck off
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,562
    Goduckies said:

    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Fuck off
    great contribution, as always
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,011
    jecornel said:

    Can’t wait for the radical left to thumbs down.

    Gender Affirming Care
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,252 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Yeah because that's the point
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,360 Swaye's Wigwam
    SFGbob said:

    jecornel said:

    Can’t wait for the radical left to thumbs down.

    Gender Affirming Care
    It’s the standard of care too.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,562
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Yeah because that's the point
    So the girl isn’t that important to you.

    Prop?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,154 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Yes. Do you still favor sexually mutilating children? Easy to be a conservative. Don't hurt yourself.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,562
    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Yes. Do you still favor sexually mutilating children? Easy to be a conservative. Don't hurt yourself.
    I don’t favor sexually mutilating children. Never did.

    But you think $350,000 for her anguish, potential infertility, etc. is more than generous.

    Got it!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,252 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Yeah because that's the point
    So the girl isn’t that important to you.

    Prop?
    You vote for child mutilation so go fuck yourself
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,252 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Yes. Do you still favor sexually mutilating children? Easy to be a conservative. Don't hurt yourself.
    I don’t favor sexually mutilating children. Never did.

    But you think $350,000 for her anguish, potential infertility, etc. is more than generous.

    Got it!
    Joe Biden does and the rest of the people you vote for so yes you do
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,562
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Yeah because that's the point
    So the girl isn’t that important to you.

    Prop?
    You vote for child mutilation so go fuck yourself
    I don’t get a line item veto when I vote. You don’t either. I assume that’s why you vote for fascists.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,252 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Yeah because that's the point
    So the girl isn’t that important to you.

    Prop?
    You vote for child mutilation so go fuck yourself
    I don’t get a line item veto when I vote. You don’t either. I assume that’s why you vote for fascists.
    I don't vote for child mutilation

    You do

    And you're a fascist
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,154 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Yeah because that's the point
    So the girl isn’t that important to you.

    Prop?
    You vote for child mutilation so go fuck yourself
    I don’t get a line item veto when I vote. You don’t either. I assume that’s why you vote for fascists.
    I can explain the policy issues that support my vote. You can't and won't. Still waiting for your thoughts (that's funny right there) on the 2024 dem nomination. Still waiting for you to describe the fascism that I vote for.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,252 Founders Club
    H is compelled to drag this into the weeds to obfuscate the mutilation of children but he doesn't support it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,562
    edited June 2023
    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Yeah because that's the point
    So the girl isn’t that important to you.

    Prop?
    You vote for child mutilation so go fuck yourself
    I don’t get a line item veto when I vote. You don’t either. I assume that’s why you vote for fascists.
    I can explain the policy issues that support my vote. You can't and won't. Still waiting for your thoughts (that's funny right there) on the 2024 dem nomination. Still waiting for you to describe the fascism that I vote for.
    You still cling to the most ridiculous conspiracy theories and deny the evidence of your senses in order to justify the actions of a defeated “strong man” in his quest to retain power. How are you not a fascist?

    I’ve made it abundantly clear I will vote for the President again in 2024. Strengthening our NATO alliance, infrastructure, judicial appointments are among the reasons. Plus he’s still not Daddy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,562
    edited June 2023
    RaceBannon said:

    H is compelled to drag this into the weeds to obfuscate the mutilation of children but he doesn't support it

    So she’s just a prop for you. Thought so.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,360 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Yeah because that's the point
    So the girl isn’t that important to you.

    Prop?
    You vote for child mutilation so go fuck yourself
    I don’t get a line item veto when I vote. You don’t either. I assume that’s why you vote for fascists.
    I can explain the policy issues that support my vote. You can't and won't. Still waiting for your thoughts (that's funny right there) on the 2024 dem nomination. Still waiting for you to describe the fascism that I vote for.
    You still cling to the most ridiculous conspiracy theories and deny the evidence of your senses in order to justify the actions of a defeated “strong man” in his quest to retain power. How are you not a fascist?

    I’ve made it abundantly clear I will vote for the President again in 2024. Strengthening our NATO alliance, infrastructure, judicial appointments are among the reasons. Plus he’s still not Daddy.
    Like the gal who doesn’t know what a woman is?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,154 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Yeah because that's the point
    So the girl isn’t that important to you.

    Prop?
    You vote for child mutilation so go fuck yourself
    I don’t get a line item veto when I vote. You don’t either. I assume that’s why you vote for fascists.
    I can explain the policy issues that support my vote. You can't and won't. Still waiting for your thoughts (that's funny right there) on the 2024 dem nomination. Still waiting for you to describe the fascism that I vote for.
    You still cling to the most ridiculous conspiracy theories and deny the evidence of your senses in order to justify the actions of a defeated “strong man” in his quest to retain power. How are you not a fascist?

    I’ve made it abundantly clear I will vote for the President again in 2024. Strengthening our NATO alliance, infrastructure, judicial appointments are among the reasons. Plus he’s still not Daddy.
    Yes, I support honest elections. You know and I know that the internal controls over clean voting lists, ballot handling, ballot counting, ballot retention are an embarrassment for their failure to be imposed and followed with consequences for the failure. So unlimited abortion and dirty expensive and unreliable solar and wind power with hundreds of billions sent off to the chicoms and some NATO virtue signaling are on your list and of course the dementia patient's high character. Trump actually got some real movement on NATO.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    HHusky said:

    Still favor capping non-economic damages, Gasbag? The complaint alleges medical negligence. California has caps.

    $350,000

    Fuck off
    great contribution, as always
    You get what you give dumbfuck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.