Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Thank God for the Supreme Court
Bendintheriver
Member Posts: 7,040 
in Tug Tavern
Our founders were clearly brilliant. Even though the rats would like to get rid of the Constitution and destroy any evidence of our history, we still have the SC to help those of us who love our country and want the government to stay out of our lives.
In MN, they took a lady's home, paid off the debt she owed and kept the rest of her money saying she had no right to it. After local and state authorities denied this woman's claim of theft by the rat government in MN, the SC stepped in and did the right thing.
This is the world rats want. They can take whatever you own away from you. You have no rights. What you have is owned by the government.
What kind of assholes would do this to a senior citizen? I get selling the property to pay back taxes etc. but keeping any left over equity is cruel and inhumane. This is exactly what socialist/fascists/communists do, if history is any proof.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/often-divided-supreme-court-shows-unity-protecting-fundamental-right
While left-wing attacks on the Supreme Court continue, the justices demonstrated again last week that simple partisan categories cannot explain their work. In Tyler v. Hennepin County, the court unanimously agreed that the right to property continues even when the government seizes land to recover a tax debt.
Even with a court sharply divided over questions of race, religion and government power, the justices came together to re-affirm the most basic of constitutional freedoms.
Tyler was another case that pitted an individual property owner against a government Leviathan. The plaintiff was a 94-year-old woman who had bought a one-bedroom condo in Minneapolis. After living there until 2010, a rise in neighborhood crime led her and her family to think it would be safer for her to move into a senior community.
No one paid her property taxes on the condo after she moved out. It accrued about $2,000 in unpaid taxes plus and about $13,000 in interest and penalties. The county foreclosed on Tyler’s condo and sold it for $40,000. The sale extinguished Tyler’s $15,000 debt, but the county kept the remaining $25,000 for its own purposes.
In MN, they took a lady's home, paid off the debt she owed and kept the rest of her money saying she had no right to it. After local and state authorities denied this woman's claim of theft by the rat government in MN, the SC stepped in and did the right thing.
This is the world rats want. They can take whatever you own away from you. You have no rights. What you have is owned by the government.
What kind of assholes would do this to a senior citizen? I get selling the property to pay back taxes etc. but keeping any left over equity is cruel and inhumane. This is exactly what socialist/fascists/communists do, if history is any proof.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/often-divided-supreme-court-shows-unity-protecting-fundamental-right
While left-wing attacks on the Supreme Court continue, the justices demonstrated again last week that simple partisan categories cannot explain their work. In Tyler v. Hennepin County, the court unanimously agreed that the right to property continues even when the government seizes land to recover a tax debt.
Even with a court sharply divided over questions of race, religion and government power, the justices came together to re-affirm the most basic of constitutional freedoms.
Tyler was another case that pitted an individual property owner against a government Leviathan. The plaintiff was a 94-year-old woman who had bought a one-bedroom condo in Minneapolis. After living there until 2010, a rise in neighborhood crime led her and her family to think it would be safer for her to move into a senior community.
No one paid her property taxes on the condo after she moved out. It accrued about $2,000 in unpaid taxes plus and about $13,000 in interest and penalties. The county foreclosed on Tyler’s condo and sold it for $40,000. The sale extinguished Tyler’s $15,000 debt, but the county kept the remaining $25,000 for its own purposes.
Comments
-
I like to say I don’t disclose my political whims then downvote anti-communist, anti-authoritarian Supreme Court rulings. That’s what I like to do.
-
Pretty sure Mello's new Target tuck friendly undies have him in a painful bind and it's upset.pawz said:I like to say I don’t disclose my political whims then downvote anti-communist, anti-authoritarian Supreme Court rulings. That’s what I like to do.
-
Mello is fine with confiscating property and wealth from black seniors.Sledog said:
Pretty sure Mello's new Target tuck friendly undies have him in a painful bind and it's upset.pawz said:I like to say I don’t disclose my political whims then downvote anti-communist, anti-authoritarian Supreme Court rulings. That’s what I like to do.
-
So he is a Trump voterBob_C said:
Mello is fine with confiscating property and wealth from black seniors.Sledog said:
Pretty sure Mello's new Target tuck friendly undies have him in a painful bind and it's upset.pawz said:I like to say I don’t disclose my political whims then downvote anti-communist, anti-authoritarian Supreme Court rulings. That’s what I like to do.
-
Is Mello aware that these were 9-0 votes?
-
It clearly doesn't matter. In typical rat fashion, it is hate for those that think differently than they do.BleachedAnusDawg said:Is Mello aware that these were 9-0 votes?
-
That is the result of packing the SCOTUS with MAGAs - the D's will now try to pack the court with 10 new justices - an election year and election malarkey ensuesBleachedAnusDawg said:Is Mello aware that these were 9-0 votes?
