WOOF!
We now have hard evidence Ducks can't develop.
Always nice when actual data confirms your priors.
Twelve 4 stars drafted out of 87 is worse than I wood have guessed quite honestly.
Comments
-
Well now that UW has 3 five stars I guess this puts us at 33%, assuming at this point Smalls and Huard are not drafted. Unless I'm missing a five star other than Shaq.
-
The 5 star % isn’t bad considering the sample size but goddamn 12/87 is terrible.
-
I'm assuming that you have to have entered the draft to be a factor on the denominator?
I'd love to dig more into the TCU numbers ... I know we had a number of dudes for a while flake out for being a little too fast strategy -
-
The Athletic dug into 11 years of data to find the answer. For three-, four- and five-star prospects, which schools had the highest percentage of prospects drafted?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:@dnc?? A Q??!!??
What’s the tim frame on this?
Using the 247Sports Composite Rating, we tallied the total three-, four- and five-star prospects signed at each of the 65 Power 5 programs from 2009 through 2019 and how many of each star rating were drafted from 2012 through 2022 in the seven-round event that features more than 250 picks each year. Then we tallied the percentages for each school. The top and bottom 10 featured some usual suspects and some surprises.
To prevent small sample sizes, we limited the rankings to schools that signed at least five five-star prospects and 20 four-star prospects.
Here, we examine the core question: If you’re a three-, four- or five-star recruit, which school gives you the best chance to go pro?
-
TYFYSdnc said:
The Athletic dug into 11 years of data to find the answer. For three-, four- and five-star prospects, which schools had the highest percentage of prospects drafted?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:@dnc?? A Q??!!??
What’s the tim frame on this?
Using the 247Sports Composite Rating, we tallied the total three-, four- and five-star prospects signed at each of the 65 Power 5 programs from 2009 through 2019 and how many of each star rating were drafted from 2012 through 2022 in the seven-round event that features more than 250 picks each year. Then we tallied the percentages for each school. The top and bottom 10 featured some usual suspects and some surprises.
To prevent small sample sizes, we limited the rankings to schools that signed at least five five-star prospects and 20 four-star prospects.
Here, we examine the core question: If you’re a three-, four- or five-star recruit, which school gives you the best chance to go pro? -
take this to the TCU boredTequilla said:I'm assuming that you have to have entered the draft to be a factor on the denominator?
I'd love to dig more into the TCU numbers ... I know we had a number of dudes for a while flake out for being a little too fast strategy -
Any chance someone can post this article in the Wam?
-
-
What does this say about the "evaluations" of Brandon Huffman and Greg Biggins and the rest?
-
They’re not good at this and are easily influenced by stupid stuff.Geevis_and_Butthead said:What does this say about the "evaluations" of Brandon Huffman and Greg Biggins and the rest?
-
Smalls and Huard going to drop t)3 average around herednc said:
We now have hard evidence Ducks can't develop.
Always nice when actual data confirms your priors.
Twelve 4 stars drafted out of 87 is worse than I wood have guessed quite honestly. -
Oregon has had 14-5* guys.
5 drafted (KT, HN, J-Stew, DAT, AA)
1 going this draft (NS)
1 undrafted (Colvin)
3 still at UO (JD, DM, JC jr)
2 transferred (Flowe, Seastrunk)
2 medically retired (Tyner, Kaumatule) then transferred.
Of the guys who stayed at Oregon 6 of 7 were drafted
Of the guys currently at Oregon, 2 of 3 will be drafted (Conerly and Dickey) D. Manning may if he has a solid year.
So 8-9 of 10 will be after their careers at Oregon.
Conerly (keep hope alive) or Dickey could always portal.
NOC.
#butstill
-
Do you see Connerly getting drafted as a TE or LT?46XiJCAB said:Oregon has had 14-5* guys.
5 drafted (KT, HN, J-Stew, DAT, AA)
1 going this draft (NS)
1 undrafted (Colvin)
3 still at UO (JD, DM, JC jr)
2 transferred (Flowe, Seastrunk)
2 medically retired (Tyner, Kaumatule) then transferred.
Of the guys who stayed at Oregon 6 of 7 were drafted
Of the guys currently at Oregon, 2 of 3 will be drafted (Conerly and Dickey) D. Manning may if he has a solid year.
So 8-9 of 10 will be after their careers at Oregon.
Conerly (keep hope alive) or Dickey could always portal.
NOC.
#butstill -
LT.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Do you see Connerly getting drafted as a TE or LT?46XiJCAB said:Oregon has had 14-5* guys.
5 drafted (KT, HN, J-Stew, DAT, AA)
1 going this draft (NS)
1 undrafted (Colvin)
3 still at UO (JD, DM, JC jr)
2 transferred (Flowe, Seastrunk)
2 medically retired (Tyner, Kaumatule) then transferred.
Of the guys who stayed at Oregon 6 of 7 were drafted
Of the guys currently at Oregon, 2 of 3 will be drafted (Conerly and Dickey) D. Manning may if he has a solid year.
So 8-9 of 10 will be after their careers at Oregon.
Conerly (keep hope alive) or Dickey could always portal.
NOC.
#butstill
Where he’s the starter.
Cool story though. -
He isn’t the one talking about moving Conerly to TE, that’s Lanning.46XiJCAB said:
LT.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Do you see Connerly getting drafted as a TE or LT?46XiJCAB said:Oregon has had 14-5* guys.
5 drafted (KT, HN, J-Stew, DAT, AA)
1 going this draft (NS)
1 undrafted (Colvin)
3 still at UO (JD, DM, JC jr)
2 transferred (Flowe, Seastrunk)
2 medically retired (Tyner, Kaumatule) then transferred.
Of the guys who stayed at Oregon 6 of 7 were drafted
Of the guys currently at Oregon, 2 of 3 will be drafted (Conerly and Dickey) D. Manning may if he has a solid year.
So 8-9 of 10 will be after their careers at Oregon.
Conerly (keep hope alive) or Dickey could always portal.
NOC.
#butstill
Where he’s the starter.
Cool story though. -
texas, wtf? so, does this mean sark has gotten his guys in there?dnc said:
We now have hard evidence Ducks can't develop.
Always nice when actual data confirms your priors.
Twelve 4 stars drafted out of 87 is worse than I wood have guessed quite honestly. -
Can we get a breakdown by staffs. MB, CK, MH, WT, MC and DL. That would be really interesting.rodmansrage said:
texas, wtf? so, does this mean sark has gotten his guys in there?dnc said:
We now have hard evidence Ducks can't develop.
Always nice when actual data confirms your priors.
Twelve 4 stars drafted out of 87 is worse than I wood have guessed quite honestly. -
Go for it46XiJCAB said:
Can we get a breakdown by staffs. MB, CK, MH, WT, MC and DL. That would be really interesting.rodmansrage said:
texas, wtf? so, does this mean sark has gotten his guys in there?dnc said:
We now have hard evidence Ducks can't develop.
Always nice when actual data confirms your priors.
Twelve 4 stars drafted out of 87 is worse than I wood have guessed quite honestly. -
I did my 20 whole minutes of "data driven research" on Oregon's overall 5* success.dnc said:
Go for it46XiJCAB said:
Can we get a breakdown by staffs. MB, CK, MH, WT, MC and DL. That would be really interesting.rodmansrage said:
texas, wtf? so, does this mean sark has gotten his guys in there?dnc said:
We now have hard evidence Ducks can't develop.
Always nice when actual data confirms your priors.
Twelve 4 stars drafted out of 87 is worse than I wood have guessed quite honestly.
Pass.
