WOOF!
Comments
-
They’re not good at this and are easily influenced by stupid stuff.Geevis_and_Butthead said:What does this say about the "evaluations" of Brandon Huffman and Greg Biggins and the rest?
-
Smalls and Huard going to drop t)3 average around herednc said:
We now have hard evidence Ducks can't develop.
Always nice when actual data confirms your priors.
Twelve 4 stars drafted out of 87 is worse than I wood have guessed quite honestly. -
Oregon has had 14-5* guys.
5 drafted (KT, HN, J-Stew, DAT, AA)
1 going this draft (NS)
1 undrafted (Colvin)
3 still at UO (JD, DM, JC jr)
2 transferred (Flowe, Seastrunk)
2 medically retired (Tyner, Kaumatule) then transferred.
Of the guys who stayed at Oregon 6 of 7 were drafted
Of the guys currently at Oregon, 2 of 3 will be drafted (Conerly and Dickey) D. Manning may if he has a solid year.
So 8-9 of 10 will be after their careers at Oregon.
Conerly (keep hope alive) or Dickey could always portal.
NOC.
#butstill
-
Do you see Connerly getting drafted as a TE or LT?46XiJCAB said:Oregon has had 14-5* guys.
5 drafted (KT, HN, J-Stew, DAT, AA)
1 going this draft (NS)
1 undrafted (Colvin)
3 still at UO (JD, DM, JC jr)
2 transferred (Flowe, Seastrunk)
2 medically retired (Tyner, Kaumatule) then transferred.
Of the guys who stayed at Oregon 6 of 7 were drafted
Of the guys currently at Oregon, 2 of 3 will be drafted (Conerly and Dickey) D. Manning may if he has a solid year.
So 8-9 of 10 will be after their careers at Oregon.
Conerly (keep hope alive) or Dickey could always portal.
NOC.
#butstill -
LT.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Do you see Connerly getting drafted as a TE or LT?46XiJCAB said:Oregon has had 14-5* guys.
5 drafted (KT, HN, J-Stew, DAT, AA)
1 going this draft (NS)
1 undrafted (Colvin)
3 still at UO (JD, DM, JC jr)
2 transferred (Flowe, Seastrunk)
2 medically retired (Tyner, Kaumatule) then transferred.
Of the guys who stayed at Oregon 6 of 7 were drafted
Of the guys currently at Oregon, 2 of 3 will be drafted (Conerly and Dickey) D. Manning may if he has a solid year.
So 8-9 of 10 will be after their careers at Oregon.
Conerly (keep hope alive) or Dickey could always portal.
NOC.
#butstill
Where he’s the starter.
Cool story though. -
He isn’t the one talking about moving Conerly to TE, that’s Lanning.46XiJCAB said:
LT.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Do you see Connerly getting drafted as a TE or LT?46XiJCAB said:Oregon has had 14-5* guys.
5 drafted (KT, HN, J-Stew, DAT, AA)
1 going this draft (NS)
1 undrafted (Colvin)
3 still at UO (JD, DM, JC jr)
2 transferred (Flowe, Seastrunk)
2 medically retired (Tyner, Kaumatule) then transferred.
Of the guys who stayed at Oregon 6 of 7 were drafted
Of the guys currently at Oregon, 2 of 3 will be drafted (Conerly and Dickey) D. Manning may if he has a solid year.
So 8-9 of 10 will be after their careers at Oregon.
Conerly (keep hope alive) or Dickey could always portal.
NOC.
#butstill
Where he’s the starter.
Cool story though. -
texas, wtf? so, does this mean sark has gotten his guys in there?dnc said:
We now have hard evidence Ducks can't develop.
Always nice when actual data confirms your priors.
Twelve 4 stars drafted out of 87 is worse than I wood have guessed quite honestly. -
Can we get a breakdown by staffs. MB, CK, MH, WT, MC and DL. That would be really interesting.rodmansrage said:
texas, wtf? so, does this mean sark has gotten his guys in there?dnc said:
We now have hard evidence Ducks can't develop.
Always nice when actual data confirms your priors.
Twelve 4 stars drafted out of 87 is worse than I wood have guessed quite honestly. -
Go for it46XiJCAB said:
Can we get a breakdown by staffs. MB, CK, MH, WT, MC and DL. That would be really interesting.rodmansrage said:
texas, wtf? so, does this mean sark has gotten his guys in there?dnc said:
We now have hard evidence Ducks can't develop.
Always nice when actual data confirms your priors.
Twelve 4 stars drafted out of 87 is worse than I wood have guessed quite honestly. -
I did my 20 whole minutes of "data driven research" on Oregon's overall 5* success.dnc said:
Go for it46XiJCAB said:
Can we get a breakdown by staffs. MB, CK, MH, WT, MC and DL. That would be really interesting.rodmansrage said:
texas, wtf? so, does this mean sark has gotten his guys in there?dnc said:
We now have hard evidence Ducks can't develop.
Always nice when actual data confirms your priors.
Twelve 4 stars drafted out of 87 is worse than I wood have guessed quite honestly.
Pass.
