Nike wtf?

46XiJCAB

First Bud Light and now Nike with women’s sports bras and leggings. Yes, every woman wants to see how Nike’s gear for them looks on a guy cosplaying a woman.

WestlinnDuck

Compare and contrast the Air Jordan movie and an entrepreneurial NIKE marketing to males, a multibillion dollar market, to marketing bras and leggings to mentally ill trannies. Thousands to be made.

HuskyJW

Wanna be like dyke

BleachedAnusDawg

I quit buying Nike several years ago. Nothing's changed with me.

greenblood

Didn't Seinfeld solve this problem 30 years ago, with The Bro?

haie

46XiJCAB said:

First Bud Light and now Nike with women’s sports bras and leggings. Yes, every woman wants to see how Nike’s gear for them looks on a guy cosplaying a woman.

Take it to the "Nike and their slaves UO are massive fags" board.

46XiJCAB

haie said:

46XiJCAB said:

First Bud Light and now Nike with women’s sports bras and leggings. Yes, every woman wants to see how Nike’s gear for them looks on a guy cosplaying a woman.

Take it to the "Nike and their slaves UO are massive fags" board.

You must love the smell of my ass the way you follow me around.

haie

46XiJCAB said:

haie said:

46XiJCAB said:

First Bud Light and now Nike with women’s sports bras and leggings. Yes, every woman wants to see how Nike’s gear for them looks on a guy cosplaying a woman.

Take it to the "Nike and their slaves UO are massive fags" board.

You must love the smell of my ass the way you follow me around.

No one is "following around" a guy with 16k posts all over the board in 1.5 years.

Sounds like your quook ass is just butthurt that you have to blow a reconstructed cock instead of just Phil's now.

RaceBannon

The Tug is left v right not Dawgs v ducks

Some of you need to learn the difference

haie

RaceBannon said:

The Tug is left v right not Dawgs v ducks

Some of you need to learn the difference

Nike is left. So it works out. For me.

46XiJCAB

haie said:

46XiJCAB said:

haie said:

46XiJCAB said:

First Bud Light and now Nike with women’s sports bras and leggings. Yes, every woman wants to see how Nike’s gear for them looks on a guy cosplaying a woman.

Take it to the "Nike and their slaves UO are massive fags" board.

You must love the smell of my ass the way you follow me around.

No one is "following around" a guy with 16k posts all over the board in 1.5 years.

Sounds like your quook ass is just butthurt that you have to blow a reconstructed cock instead of just Phil's now.

Except you, dumbfuck. Enjoy the aroma.

pawz

RaceBannon said:

The Tug is left v right not Dawgs v ducks

Some of you need to learn the difference

Senator, I for one reserve the right to poont out quookiness at any and all tims. Thank you for your understanding on this grave matter.

thechatch

Nike has always jumped in the middle of controversy.

Barkley

Woods

Kaepernick

More so it seems lately, but the stock price has always shown that the company isn’t run by dummies when it comes to selling apparel.

That said, shares down since this “announcement”.

RaceBannon

thechatch said:

Nike has always jumped in the middle of controversy.

Barkley

Woods

Kaepernick

More so it seems lately, but the stock price has always shown that the company isn’t run by dummies when it comes to selling apparel.

That said, shares down since this “announcement”.

As a white guy I liked the Barkley ad and thought it was true. Kids role model should be their parents

I'm a well known Tiger honk

Kaep is irrelevant to me

I'm no longer in the demographic anyone cares about but neither blacks or whites are down with this trans stuff

That may explain the dip

Fire_Marshall_Bill

BleachedAnusDawg said:

I quit buying Nike several years ago. Nothing's changed with me.

I quit in the mid 2000s. It was because of Fill, but now there's all the woke nonsense. I was tempted to buy some black Monarchs because most shoes suck now but I resisted.

PurpleThrobber

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

I quit buying Nike several years ago. Nothing's changed with me.

I quit in the mid 2000s. It was because of Fill, but now there's all the woke nonsense. I was tempted to buy some black Monarchs because most shoes suck now but I resisted.

Skechers or die, bitches.Comfy AF.

Hey Dudes are pretty soft on the feet too but strictly summer wear. They have little air holes in the soul and sometimes water seeps in.

Clearly, not for exercise/training. Fuck that shit.

haie

thechatch said:

Nike has always jumped in the middle of controversy.

Barkley

Woods

Kaepernick

More so it seems lately, but the stock price has always shown that the company isn’t run by dummies when it comes to selling apparel.

That said, shares down since this “announcement”.

Great companies get hijacked by this shit.

Woods wasn't a controversy. No one cares about his personal life.

Kaepernick was just a meh thing overall.

But trending this way it does fuck even the biggest companies in the long run.

thechatch

haie said:

thechatch said:

Nike has always jumped in the middle of controversy.

Barkley

Woods

Kaepernick

More so it seems lately, but the stock price has always shown that the company isn’t run by dummies when it comes to selling apparel.

That said, shares down since this “announcement”.

Great companies get hijacked by this shit.

Woods wasn't a controversy. No one cares about his personal life.

Kaepernick was just a meh thing overall.

But trending this way it does fuck even the biggest companies in the long run.

Kinda disagree. Kaepernick getting the Nike contract was a big deal at the time. Front page news.

In the world of golf, Nike keeping Tiger after the affair and then a DUI was definitely controversial.

I don’t see the trans thing being a real needle mover one way or another.

Now if Nike signed a world famous trans athlete to be the face of the company, that would be a big risk, but no such thing exists so this may not really hurt them that much.

The only Nike shoes I own are my runners. Otherwise it’s Allbirds for casual wear. Nike still makes better apparel than its contemporaries and I’m not gonna wear adidas or UA just because a tranny endorses their sports bras. 🤷‍♂️

pawz

thechatch said:

haie said:

thechatch said:

Nike has always jumped in the middle of controversy.

Barkley

Woods

Kaepernick

More so it seems lately, but the stock price has always shown that the company isn’t run by dummies when it comes to selling apparel.

That said, shares down since this “announcement”.

Great companies get hijacked by this shit.

Woods wasn't a controversy. No one cares about his personal life.

Kaepernick was just a meh thing overall.

But trending this way it does fuck even the biggest companies in the long run.

Kinda disagree. Kaepernick getting the Nike contract was a big deal at the time. Front page news.

In the world of golf, Nike keeping Tiger after the affair and then a DUI was definitely controversial.

I don’t see the trans thing being a real needle mover one way or another.

Now if Nike signed a world famous trans athlete to be the face of the company, that would be a big risk, but no such thing exists so this may not really hurt them that much.

The only Nike shoes I own are my runners. Otherwise it’s Allbirds for casual wear. Nike still makes better apparel than its contemporaries and I’m not gonna wear adidas or UA just because a tranny endorses their sports bras. 🤷‍♂️

The real difference being you are asking women to be inclusive to mentally men. Much easier sell than pitching that idea on lumber jacks and heavy equipment operators.

So it seems like we basically agree, but still.

thechatch

pawz said:

thechatch said:

haie said:

thechatch said:

Nike has always jumped in the middle of controversy.

Barkley

Woods

Kaepernick

More so it seems lately, but the stock price has always shown that the company isn’t run by dummies when it comes to selling apparel.

That said, shares down since this “announcement”.

Great companies get hijacked by this shit.

Woods wasn't a controversy. No one cares about his personal life.

Kaepernick was just a meh thing overall.

But trending this way it does fuck even the biggest companies in the long run.

Kinda disagree. Kaepernick getting the Nike contract was a big deal at the time. Front page news.

In the world of golf, Nike keeping Tiger after the affair and then a DUI was definitely controversial.

I don’t see the trans thing being a real needle mover one way or another.

Now if Nike signed a world famous trans athlete to be the face of the company, that would be a big risk, but no such thing exists so this may not really hurt them that much.

The only Nike shoes I own are my runners. Otherwise it’s Allbirds for casual wear. Nike still makes better apparel than its contemporaries and I’m not gonna wear adidas or UA just because a tranny endorses their sports bras. 🤷‍♂️

The real difference being you are asking women to be inclusive to mentally men. Much easier sell than pitching that idea on lumber jacks and heavy equipment operators.

So it seems like we basically agree, but still.

I only meant that this would be a bigger deal/more controversial move for Nike if the tranny they had hocking their leggings was globally known.

No one has ever heard of this person until he/she/it signed the Nike deal. If Serena Williams revealed she had a dick and was the face of Nike like Tiger Woods was, it’s a lot more market disruptive than I think this will ever turn out to be.

That’s all I meant.

haie

thechatch said:

haie said:

thechatch said:

Nike has always jumped in the middle of controversy.

Barkley

Woods

Kaepernick

More so it seems lately, but the stock price has always shown that the company isn’t run by dummies when it comes to selling apparel.

That said, shares down since this “announcement”.

Great companies get hijacked by this shit.

Woods wasn't a controversy. No one cares about his personal life.

Kaepernick was just a meh thing overall.

But trending this way it does fuck even the biggest companies in the long run.

Kinda disagree. Kaepernick getting the Nike contract was a big deal at the time. Front page news.

In the world of golf, Nike keeping Tiger after the affair and then a DUI was definitely controversial.

I don’t see the trans thing being a real needle mover one way or another.

Now if Nike signed a world famous trans athlete to be the face of the company, that would be a big risk, but no such thing exists so this may not really hurt them that much.

The only Nike shoes I own are my runners. Otherwise it’s Allbirds for casual wear. Nike still makes better apparel than its contemporaries and I’m not gonna wear adidas or UA just because a tranny endorses their sports bras. 🤷‍♂️

When Kaepernick happened I was already numb to all that shit plus I hate the NFL so I'll defer to you there.

Tiger I disagree, as someone who drowns in golf culture.

Golf can't live without him. Personal issues that many men go through, no one gave a fuck. I'm not sure he lost anything but his wife and a shitty video game license he didn't need.

Nike would never entertain dropping him. Ever. They'd drop Lebron before they drop him.