Really?

topdawgnc

Fucking Charlie Rangel is 84 and the fucker in Mississippi is 76.

How in the fuck are they still being re-elected?

doogsinparadise

Why so ageist dude?

PurpleJ

Term. Limits. Now.

HFNY

Charlie Rangel is also corrupt, has to be one of the worst in DC.

topdawgnc

doogsinparadise said:

Why so ageist dude?

All these old fuckers are from a day gone by.

I've been around people over 75 and most are starting to lose mental capacity.

HuskyJW

It's odd to me how in politics and coaching experience is viewed as a bad thing.

Swaye

Charlie Rangel has always been a POS. His age has nothing to do with it.

PurpleJ

HuskyJW said:

It's odd to me how in politics and coaching experience is viewed as a bad thing.

Would you want Lou Holtz coaching your team right now? Didn't think so...

doogsinparadise

Well Lou is older than Gil Dobie, so not sure that counts.

dnc

HuskyJW said:

It's odd to me how in politics and coaching experience is viewed as a bad thing.

When is it viewed as a bad thing in coaching?

In politics too much experience is viewed as a bad thing because it's easy to loose touch with the REAL world when you've been in Washington playing grabass with lobbyists for decades.

Swaye

dnc said:

HuskyJW said:

It's odd to me how in politics and coaching experience is viewed as a bad thing.

When is it viewed as a bad thing in coaching?

In politics too much experience is viewed as a bad thing because it's easy to loose touch with the REAL world when you've been in Washington playing grabass hide the weenie with lobbyists for decades.

HuskyJW

Well....for one...

Randy Hart was blasted years ago as unproductive and the game passed him by.....goes to Stanford and his guys are steamrollin' people.

dnc said:

HuskyJW said:

It's odd to me how in politics and coaching experience is viewed as a bad thing.

When is it viewed as a bad thing in coaching?

In politics too much experience is viewed as a bad thing because it's easy to loose touch with the REAL world when you've been in Washington playing grabass with lobbyists for decades.

GrundleStiltzkin

Just cuz

HFNY

Too little experience (not being an executive in the private sector, not having a leadership position in the military, and / or not being a governor) definitely hurts when a person talks their way into the Presidency (Exhibit A: the junior senator from Illinois). Exhibit B would be LBJ, who came from the Senate and took over after JFK died.

Harry Truman had a executive experience in WWI (artillery commander) and also tried his hand in the private sector (didn't work out for his store, but at least he tried and gained a better understanding of how the private sector works).

MikeDamone

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Just cuz

Why is Stringfellow on a beach?

dnc

MikeDamone said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Just cuz

Why is Stringfellow on a beach?

Because he's going back to Cali to play for Sark. At least that's what I'm hearing.

Kaepsknee

It just shows that the Tea Party candidate taking down CantorFS is a mirage. Unfortunatley for the RNC, the teaparty will only be successful in swallowing their own. And those that are in run offs against the Dems in November will lose most of those elections.

The Republican Party is more fractured than 2012. They had a huge opportunity to take some seats this November but have squandered the opportunity IMO.

HFNY

You mean his guys were steamrollin' grass while writhing on the ground faking injuries?

HuskyJW said:

Well....for one...

Randy Hart was blasted years ago as unproductive and the game passed him by.....goes to Stanford and his guys are steamrollin' people.

dnc said:

HuskyJW said:

It's odd to me how in politics and coaching experience is viewed as a bad thing.

When is it viewed as a bad thing in coaching?

In politics too much experience is viewed as a bad thing because it's easy to loose touch with the REAL world when you've been in Washington playing grabass with lobbyists for decades.

topdawgnc

HuskyJW said:

It's odd to me how in politics and coaching experience is viewed as a bad thing.

I'm really not a term limits guy.

I simply don't understand how people could vote for someone who at the end of their term will be 82 years old.

And fucking Rangel is 84.

I don't give a fuck what anyone says ... they are on diminishing returns for their fucking brain power.

With all that said they got elected ... so power to the people.

topdawgnc

salemcoog said:

It just shows that the Tea Party candidate taking down CantorFS is a mirage. Unfortunatley for the RNC, the teaparty will only be successful in swallowing their own. And those that are in run offs against the Dems in November will lose most of those elections.

The Republican Party is more fractured than 2012. They had a huge opportunity to take some seats this November but have squandered the opportunity IMO.

What the fuck are you talking about?

Colorado, Mississippi and Oklahoma all had primary winners who were establishment candidates.

The Tea Party got routed at the ballot box this year.

After last night the dems are in big trouble ...

there are no witches or similar on the ballot this go around.

allpurpleallgold

HuskyJW said:

Well....for one...

Randy Hart was blasted years ago as unproductive and the game passed him by.....goes to Stanford and his guys are steamrollin' people.

dnc said:

HuskyJW said:

It's odd to me how in politics and coaching experience is viewed as a bad thing.

When is it viewed as a bad thing in coaching?

In politics too much experience is viewed as a bad thing because it's easy to loose touch with the REAL world when you've been in Washington playing grabass with lobbyists for decades.

The retread coach, that got a job at major conference school despite sucking balls at his previous job, is your example? What qualification do you think Randy Hart had to get that job, other than experience? It sure as shit wasn't performance based.