No problem with him deciding to opt out of his deal ...
If he plans on orchestrating another "Big Three" in a location to try to take the easy way out of winning more titles, then he's cemented his legacy as one of the biggest bitches to ever play in the NBA.
Wherever he ends up, if that team loses then how was Lebron suppose to win with a team like THAT??
Cook it.
True, but LeBron is awesome because he makes everyone around him better.
Is that what Stephan A Smith was saying? I can never understand him while he constantly chokes on Lebron's jizz so bad it comes out his nose (along with every other ESPN POS talking head).
Leaving Cleveland was fine, despite the way he went about it. Miami went to 4 straight finals and won 2 yet pundits pretend he's in a shitty situation. They would proba
No problem with him deciding to opt out of his deal ...
If he plans on orchestrating another "Big Three" in a location to try to take the easy way out of winning more titles, then he's cemented his legacy as one of the biggest bitches to ever play in the NBA.
Don't give a fuck. But I mainly dislike him because he was in Autzen Stadium during that game where Oregon lost to USC, on the Duck sideline distracting the players with some other famous dumbfucks.
Don't give a fuck. But I mainly dislike him because he was in Autzen Stadium during that game where Oregon lost to USC, on the Duck sideline distracting the players with some other famous dumbfucks.
I don't care if you leave a place ... and he had every reason to leave Cleveland. No problem. Just hated the way he went about it and then how he puffed his chest out about how great they'd be in Miami in the dreckfest of the East.
What smelled about how he went to Miami though was that he was all about stacking his team to win titles. He knew that his "legacy" wouldn't be cemented without those rings since that's one of the key measures that we hold people to in hoops.
But what we will see if he leaves Miami to form another super group to win titles is that he's trying to take the shortcut to cementing his legacy by stacking his rosters to win titles. You don't get credit for that shit.
The NBA has a long history of having to pay your dues to be able to learn the lessons necessary to win. The only lesson LBJ has ever learned is that when he loses he needs to get even more players around him to stack the odds in his favor instead of finding ways to galvanize his team (see this year's Spurs) and leading them to championships.
Comments
If he plans on orchestrating another "Big Three" in a location to try to take the easy way out of winning more titles, then he's cemented his legacy as one of the biggest bitches to ever play in the NBA.
Cook it.
Particularly when some no talented HS kid verbals to a school and says that "he's taking his talents to ..."
When you're in HS, you don't have any talents to speak of.
What smelled about how he went to Miami though was that he was all about stacking his team to win titles. He knew that his "legacy" wouldn't be cemented without those rings since that's one of the key measures that we hold people to in hoops.
But what we will see if he leaves Miami to form another super group to win titles is that he's trying to take the shortcut to cementing his legacy by stacking his rosters to win titles. You don't get credit for that shit.
The NBA has a long history of having to pay your dues to be able to learn the lessons necessary to win. The only lesson LBJ has ever learned is that when he loses he needs to get even more players around him to stack the odds in his favor instead of finding ways to galvanize his team (see this year's Spurs) and leading them to championships.