Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Biden DOJ Crusade to Jail Young Man for Anti-Hillary Memes Just Got Much Uglier

«1

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,224 Founders Club
    HHusky said:
    Fascist approves of fascism

    Film at 11
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,979

    HHusky said:
    Fascist approves of fascism

    Film at 11
    The confrontation of accusers defense is a good appeal issue. No disagreement.

    Minimizing an organized fraud as a joke is something you should consider when the SEC knocks at your door.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,224 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:
    Fascist approves of fascism

    Film at 11
    The confrontation of accusers defense is a good appeal issue. No disagreement.

    Minimizing an organized fraud as a joke is something you should consider when the SEC knocks at your door.

    Leave Hillary alone?

    How about the government just fucks off

    Biden is a fascist Dictator

    I remember when you were against that
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,669 Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:
    Fascist approves of fascism

    Film at 11
    The confrontation of accusers defense is a good appeal issue. No disagreement.

    Minimizing an organized fraud as a joke is something you should consider when the SEC knocks at your door.

    Leave Hillary alone?

    How about the government just fucks off

    Biden is a fascist Dictator

    I remember when you were against that
    The dazzler has always been a fascist. If Trump using his direct STATUTORY authority from a bill passed by both houses of Congress and signed into law by the president imposes a temporary travel ban for people from Yemen, that's being a fascist according to the dazzler. Now, if Biden ignores direct STATUTORY requirements from a bill passed by both houses of Congress and signed into law by the president and opens the US border, that's not being a dictatorial fascist according to the dazzler because ...
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,979
    edited March 2023

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:
    Fascist approves of fascism

    Film at 11
    The confrontation of accusers defense is a good appeal issue. No disagreement.

    Minimizing an organized fraud as a joke is something you should consider when the SEC knocks at your door.

    Leave Hillary alone?

    How about the government just fucks off

    Biden is a fascist Dictator

    I remember when you were against that
    So the government should just stop engaging in law enforcement.

    (That moment when "libertarianism" reveals itself as anarchy.)

    Your belief that this action filed 48 hours after Biden's inauguration didn't arise under Daddy's administration is sweetly naive.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,224 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:
    Fascist approves of fascism

    Film at 11
    The confrontation of accusers defense is a good appeal issue. No disagreement.

    Minimizing an organized fraud as a joke is something you should consider when the SEC knocks at your door.

    Leave Hillary alone?

    How about the government just fucks off

    Biden is a fascist Dictator

    I remember when you were against that
    So the government should just stop engaging in law enforcement.

    (That moment when "libertarianism" reveals itself as anarchy.)

    Your belief that this action filed 48 hours after Biden's inauguration didn't arise under Daddy's administration is sweetly naive.
    The strawman
    You don't want any law enforcement

    The Trump made him do it

    And a daddy

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,979

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:
    Fascist approves of fascism

    Film at 11
    The confrontation of accusers defense is a good appeal issue. No disagreement.

    Minimizing an organized fraud as a joke is something you should consider when the SEC knocks at your door.

    Leave Hillary alone?

    How about the government just fucks off

    Biden is a fascist Dictator

    I remember when you were against that
    So the government should just stop engaging in law enforcement.

    (That moment when "libertarianism" reveals itself as anarchy.)

    Your belief that this action filed 48 hours after Biden's inauguration didn't arise under Daddy's administration is sweetly naive.
    The strawman
    You don't want any law enforcement

    The Trump made him do it

    And a daddy

    I guess I must have missed the philosophical nuance in How about the government just fucks off.
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,171 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:
    Fascist approves of fascism

    Film at 11
    The confrontation of accusers defense is a good appeal issue. No disagreement.

    Minimizing an organized fraud as a joke is something you should consider when the SEC knocks at your door.

    Leave Hillary alone?

    How about the government just fucks off

    Biden is a fascist Dictator

    I remember when you were against that
    So the government should just stop engaging in law enforcement.

    (That moment when "libertarianism" reveals itself as anarchy.)

    Your belief that this action filed 48 hours after Biden's inauguration didn't arise under Daddy's administration is sweetly naive.
    The strawman
    You don't want any law enforcement

    The Trump made him do it

    And a daddy

    I guess I must have missed the philosophical nuance in How about the government just fucks off.
    You swing and miss







































    A LOT
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,224 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:
    Fascist approves of fascism

    Film at 11
    The confrontation of accusers defense is a good appeal issue. No disagreement.

    Minimizing an organized fraud as a joke is something you should consider when the SEC knocks at your door.

    Leave Hillary alone?

    How about the government just fucks off

    Biden is a fascist Dictator

    I remember when you were against that
    So the government should just stop engaging in law enforcement.

    (That moment when "libertarianism" reveals itself as anarchy.)

    Your belief that this action filed 48 hours after Biden's inauguration didn't arise under Daddy's administration is sweetly naive.
    The strawman
    You don't want any law enforcement

    The Trump made him do it

    And a daddy

    I guess I must have missed the philosophical nuance in How about the government just fucks off.
    I guess you're stupid
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,224 Founders Club
    The memes were a Twitter-generation version of the common joke about telling one’s political opponents to turn out for the election next Wednesday. But, in an unprecedented move, the Biden Administration says Mackey violated the Ku Klux Klan Act by systematically acting to strip Americans of their civil rights. The KKK Act was passed to prevent literal assaults and terrorism that prevented black Americans from voting, but now the DOJ’s prosecutors say it applies to satirical online speech — they say Mackey broke the law, even though they can’t produce a single person who failed to vote due to Mackey’s stunt.

    People might want to actually read the article

    H is lying

    As usual
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,669 Standard Supporter

    The memes were a Twitter-generation version of the common joke about telling one’s political opponents to turn out for the election next Wednesday. But, in an unprecedented move, the Biden Administration says Mackey violated the Ku Klux Klan Act by systematically acting to strip Americans of their civil rights. The KKK Act was passed to prevent literal assaults and terrorism that prevented black Americans from voting, but now the DOJ’s prosecutors say it applies to satirical online speech — they say Mackey broke the law, even though they can’t produce a single person who failed to vote due to Mackey’s stunt.

    People might want to actually read the article

    H is lying

    As usual

    Remember when the dazzler fully supported the arrest of black panthers actually intimidating voters at a polling site? Actually no arrests, feds to busy arresting people for praying at an abortion site while ignoring fire bombings at abortion counseling sites. The dazzler is a noted proponent of the equal application of the law except its not a voting issue.


  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:
    Fascist approves of fascism

    Film at 11
    The confrontation of accusers defense is a good appeal issue. No disagreement.

    Minimizing an organized fraud as a joke is something you should consider when the SEC knocks at your door.

    Leave Hillary alone?

    How about the government just fucks off

    Biden is a fascist Dictator

    I remember when you were against that
    So the government should just stop engaging in SELECTIVE law enforcement.

    (That moment when "libertarianism" reveals itself as anarchy.)

    Your belief that this action filed 48 hours after Biden's inauguration didn't arise under Daddy's administration is sweetly naive.
    Fixed that for you dumb fuck, while we wait for Hunter to be charged with a felony for lying on his background check.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    i mean voter intimidation and suppression is the best way to win. whatever stops poor people and college kids from voting is good.
  • Sources
    Sources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,347 Founders Club

    The memes were a Twitter-generation version of the common joke about telling one’s political opponents to turn out for the election next Wednesday. But, in an unprecedented move, the Biden Administration says Mackey violated the Ku Klux Klan Act by systematically acting to strip Americans of their civil rights. The KKK Act was passed to prevent literal assaults and terrorism that prevented black Americans from voting, but now the DOJ’s prosecutors say it applies to satirical online speech — they say Mackey broke the law, even though they can’t produce a single person who failed to vote due to Mackey’s stunt.

    People might want to actually read the article

    H is lying

    As usual

    I think we're done here.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,979



    People might want to actually read the article

    And the criminal complaint.

    #Just_a_Twitter_Joke!
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:



    People might want to actually read the article

    And the criminal complaint.

    #Just_a_Twitter_Joke!
    You're never right.

    Fuck off.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,224 Founders Club
    HHusky said:



    People might want to actually read the article

    And the criminal complaint.

    #Just_a_Twitter_Joke!
    Bootlicker heard from

    It's a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

    Yeah no shit. That's why the government can fuck off, fascist
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,979

    HHusky said:



    People might want to actually read the article

    And the criminal complaint.

    #Just_a_Twitter_Joke!
    Bootlicker heard from

    It's a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

    Yeah no shit. That's why the government can fuck off, fascist
    It's got factual allegations and shit.

    Government's BOP, of course.

    But it's a wee bit more detailed concerning intent to defraud than you girls want to let on.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,224 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:



    People might want to actually read the article

    And the criminal complaint.

    #Just_a_Twitter_Joke!
    Bootlicker heard from

    It's a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

    Yeah no shit. That's why the government can fuck off, fascist
    It's got factual allegations and shit.

    Government's BOP, of course.

    But it's a wee bit more detailed concerning intent to defraud than you girls want to let on.
    No it isn't

    And it's the same government that spent two years lying about J6

    And lied about Hunter's laptop

    BUT THE GOVENMENT SAID SO

    Bootlicker
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 8,004 Standard Supporter
    I would say it isn't just satire because you have to take in how dumb the democrat voters are... but is that a crime hell no.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,224 Founders Club
    All of that is bad enough, but newly-unsealed documents released on Wednesday reveal new, sinister depths to the DOJ’s agenda.

    Last fall, we warned about a new tool in the arsenal of weapons used by the regime to justify censorship and rolling back the basic rights of Americans. With this new tool, corrupt journalists like Taylor Lorenz can dox, harass, and lie about anyone they want and enjoy total immunity from criticism. Why? Well, if you dare to criticize a journalist like Lorenz, someone, somewhere, might become outraged and decide to commit an act of violence. With this remarkable censorship tool, the media’s attack dog journalists are magically absolved from any criticism because some nut job, somewhere, maybe, at sometime, might act violently upon this criticism.

    The tool goes by the name “stochastic terrorism.”

    Basically, “stochastic terrorism” is the idea that, when somebody on the right criticizes somebody, they aren’t really just making a political argument. Instead, they are trying to “stoke hatred” in the expectation that some random third party will be “radicalized” and then commit political violence on their behalf.



    [T]he concept perfectly flows from being a personal attack to being a legal one. The implicit claim behind every complaint about stochastic terror is that dissident speech isn’t really speech, and therefore it doesn’t really deserve protection, because conservatives, or anyone liberals don’t like, harbor a hidden inner desire to inspire violent attacks. Any complaint about the liberals or, more importantly, the Regime, in any venue, can now be dressed up as “violent” speech deserving no constitutional protection.



    Back in October, “stochastic terrorism” was just a concept for the media, the blogosphere, and the Twitterati, and it was only a weapon for curbing speech.

    But everything moves faster in the digital age. Just five months later, the Biden Department of Justice is using the logic of “stochastic terrorism” to justify stripping core constitutional due process rights from dissident American voices.

    In its latest filings, the DOJ reveals that one of the group chats it is currently using as evidence against Mackey contained a person who is now working with the FBI as a federal informant. According to the government, the “Confidential Witness” (or CW) was a pro-Trump, “alt right” leader who pleaded guilty to the same conspiracy to deprive civil rights charges that Mackey faces, and is now collaborating with the government.

    In its filings, the government declines to say what CW’s current role with the government is, except that he is “presently engaged in proactive investigations, working with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), and may engage in additional investigations in the future.” Based on that statement, the government is asking that CW’s identity be kept secret, and that Mackey’s defense team be barred from asking any questions about CW’s current work.

    This is a much bolder request than it might seem to the legally uninitiated. The Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights guarantees the right of any criminal defendant to “be confronted with the witnesses against him.” Like most constitutional rights, this law is not absolute, but limitations to it have historically been very limited. Courts have long disallowed anonymous witnesses due to the Sixth Amendment, except in extreme circumstances involving violent, organized criminal organizations with the capacity to retaliate against witnesses and their families. And even then, courts have restricted the right to testify anonymously. For instance, in 2014, the U.S. 10th Circuit said this, about the possible danger of retaliation from the ruthless Salvadoran street gang MS-13.

    “…a generalized statement about danger — such as anyone who testifies against one of [MS 13’s] members faces danger from [MS-13] — would be insufficient to show that a threat against a witness was actual and not a result of conjecture.” [United States v. Gutierrez de Lopez, 761 F.3d 1123, 1140 (10th Cir. 2014)]

    But now, in the Mackey case, the Biden DOJ asserts that its witness’s identity must be hidden, because if not, he might face, wait for it… harassment on the Internet!

    Probably Ray Epps

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,979
    Goduckies said:

    I would say it isn't just satire because you have to take in how dumb the democrat voters are... but is that a crime hell no.

    The "January 6th was a reverential tour of the Capitol" crowd says some voters are dumb.
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,171 Founders Club

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:



    People might want to actually read the article

    And the criminal complaint.

    #Just_a_Twitter_Joke!
    Bootlicker heard from

    It's a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

    Yeah no shit. That's why the government can fuck off, fascist
    It's got factual allegations and shit.

    Government's BOP, of course.

    But it's a wee bit more detailed concerning intent to defraud than you girls want to let on.
    over

    No it isn't

    And it's the same government that spent two years lying about J6

    And lied about Hunter's laptop

    BUT THE GOVENMENT SAID SO

    Bootlicker
    You forgot Russian hookers, collusion and illegal FISA warrants. People should be swinging from gallows over that corruption.
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,171 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I would say it isn't just satire because you have to take in how dumb the democrat voters are... but is that a crime hell no.

    The "January 6th was a reverential tour of the Capitol" crowd says some voters are dumb.
    No ma'am. It was a deadly insurrection worse than Pearl Harbor or 911. For fucks sake it almost cost us? our? dEMoCrAcY!!!
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,224 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I would say it isn't just satire because you have to take in how dumb the democrat voters are... but is that a crime hell no.

    The "January 6th was a reverential tour of the Capitol" crowd says some voters are dumb.
    Nobody but you and your lying ilk said that

    No one

    Not Tucker Not me Not anyone

    A weak deflection from 2 years of lies about J6

    Pathetic
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,979

    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I would say it isn't just satire because you have to take in how dumb the democrat voters are... but is that a crime hell no.

    The "January 6th was a reverential tour of the Capitol" crowd says some voters are dumb.
    Nobody but you and your lying ilk said that

    No one

    Not Tucker Not me Not anyone

    A weak deflection from 2 years of lies about J6

    Pathetic
    Lordy, I know there are tapes.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,979
    edited March 2023
    Swaye said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:
    Fascist approves of fascism

    Film at 11
    The confrontation of accusers defense is a good appeal issue. No disagreement.

    Minimizing an organized fraud as a joke is something you should consider when the SEC knocks at your door.

    I'll mark you down for against free speech as always.
    "Fraud is protected speech" poaster weighs in.

    I've always been against speaking with a forked tongue, Tonto.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,224 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I would say it isn't just satire because you have to take in how dumb the democrat voters are... but is that a crime hell no.

    The "January 6th was a reverential tour of the Capitol" crowd says some voters are dumb.
    Nobody but you and your lying ilk said that

    No one

    Not Tucker Not me Not anyone

    A weak deflection from 2 years of lies about J6

    Pathetic
    Lordy, I know there are tapes.
    A weaker deflection