Mark Levin on Ukraine
I don't like the Ukraine shit, but he has salient points on some aspects and he made me think and care. He did not mention anything about why the US might actually be involved right now, eg Biden's involvement, labs, etc. I don't listen to him much so not sure if he hates the "conspiracy" stuff or not.
Didn't feel like posting my shit content in the full-retard PGOS thread.
Comments
-
Was he screaming the whole time? I was a listener but grew tired of that personality trait. I’m not surprised he’s all in.
Maybe for the last 10 years Ukraine should have been arming themselves and building their military to the point that Putin would have thought twice. Maybe follow Reagan’s peace through strength doctrine.
Instead they were fine with being corrupt and a bank for the corrupt. But they knew the US would jump in and why wouldn’t we since we installed Z. -
He was fairly calm, but, yeah, I often tune him out after 5 minutes if he starts ranting and raving. Rattled of several instances where Reagan sent military support to other countries in conflict and that the Ukraine thing is another version of those prior events. FWIW, he is right about what Reagan would have done based on his track record.46XiJCAB said:Was he screaming the whole time? I was a listener but grew tired of that personality trait. I’m not surprised he’s all in.
Maybe for the last 10 years Ukraine should have been arming themselves and building their military to the point that Putin would have thought twice. Maybe follow Reagan’s peace through strength doctrine.
Instead they were fine with being corrupt and a bank for the corrupt. But they knew the US would jump in and why wouldn’t we since we installed Z.
I think his point was that (in his opinion), imperfect as Ukraine is, there's a leadership responsibility to support them while also trying to negotiate peace. -
Fine support them... hut negotiate the fucking peace so we don't get dragged into war. With the downing of our drone, that just got closer.BleachedAnusDawg said:
He was fairly calm, but, yeah, I often tune him out after 5 minutes if he starts ranting and raving. Rattled of several instances where Reagan sent military support to other countries in conflict and that the Ukraine thing is another version of those prior events. FWIW, he is right about what Reagan would have done based on his track record.46XiJCAB said:Was he screaming the whole time? I was a listener but grew tired of that personality trait. I’m not surprised he’s all in.
Maybe for the last 10 years Ukraine should have been arming themselves and building their military to the point that Putin would have thought twice. Maybe follow Reagan’s peace through strength doctrine.
Instead they were fine with being corrupt and a bank for the corrupt. But they knew the US would jump in and why wouldn’t we since we installed Z.
I think his point was that (in his opinion), imperfect as Ukraine is, there's a leadership responsibility to support them while also trying to negotiate peace. -
Were you and the drone close?Goduckies said:
Fine support them... hut negotiate the fucking peace so we don't get dragged into war. With the downing of our drone, that just got closer.BleachedAnusDawg said:
He was fairly calm, but, yeah, I often tune him out after 5 minutes if he starts ranting and raving. Rattled of several instances where Reagan sent military support to other countries in conflict and that the Ukraine thing is another version of those prior events. FWIW, he is right about what Reagan would have done based on his track record.46XiJCAB said:Was he screaming the whole time? I was a listener but grew tired of that personality trait. I’m not surprised he’s all in.
Maybe for the last 10 years Ukraine should have been arming themselves and building their military to the point that Putin would have thought twice. Maybe follow Reagan’s peace through strength doctrine.
Instead they were fine with being corrupt and a bank for the corrupt. But they knew the US would jump in and why wouldn’t we since we installed Z.
I think his point was that (in his opinion), imperfect as Ukraine is, there's a leadership responsibility to support them while also trying to negotiate peace.
Ts and Ps. -
Shut the fuck upHHusky said:
Were you and the drone close?Goduckies said:
Fine support them... hut negotiate the fucking peace so we don't get dragged into war. With the downing of our drone, that just got closer.BleachedAnusDawg said:
He was fairly calm, but, yeah, I often tune him out after 5 minutes if he starts ranting and raving. Rattled of several instances where Reagan sent military support to other countries in conflict and that the Ukraine thing is another version of those prior events. FWIW, he is right about what Reagan would have done based on his track record.46XiJCAB said:Was he screaming the whole time? I was a listener but grew tired of that personality trait. I’m not surprised he’s all in.
Maybe for the last 10 years Ukraine should have been arming themselves and building their military to the point that Putin would have thought twice. Maybe follow Reagan’s peace through strength doctrine.
Instead they were fine with being corrupt and a bank for the corrupt. But they knew the US would jump in and why wouldn’t we since we installed Z.
I think his point was that (in his opinion), imperfect as Ukraine is, there's a leadership responsibility to support them while also trying to negotiate peace.
Ts and Ps. -
Reagan was smart enough to continue the covert war against the USSR in Afghanistan that Carter actually started. After Carter's weakness emboldened the Soviets to invade
Reagan played both sides against each other in Iran Iraq
Reagan kept the western hemisphere clear from commies with more covert action
Nothing RR did looked like this current clown show of publicly trying to get nukes launched by Putin, by the Euro trash and the Biden trash -
The dims love to go to Ukraine and band those kids, drink their blood etc. While making deposits and withdrawals.46XiJCAB said:Was he screaming the whole time? I was a listener but grew tired of that personality trait. I’m not surprised he’s all in.
Maybe for the last 10 years Ukraine should have been arming themselves and building their military to the point that Putin would have thought twice. Maybe follow Reagan’s peace through strength doctrine.
Instead they were fine with being corrupt and a bank for the corrupt. But they knew the US would jump in and why wouldn’t we since we installed Z. -
In 1980 Reagan was dealing with the Soviet Union 1.0 with 5 million men under arms and a still stated intent to bury us. In hindsight, we accomplished nothing in Afghanistan although it did weaken the Soviets but funded Islamic nutcases. The UK and Germany were carrying their weight in NATO and the French had nukes and an effective military. Today, we are dealing with a minor world economic power with nukes and an ineffective military run by a nutcase that isn't a military threat to Europe. If they are, let western Europe take care of the threat to them. Not one more dime until our borders are secured. That is the real and ongoing threat.BleachedAnusDawg said:Says you can't sit back when you're a leader. Real leaders lead. What would Reagan have done in this situation (I can tell you if you don't know)? Better to arm Ukraine in a proxy fight to weaken Russia than let them roll over Ukraine and knock on Poland's door, next. Don't want to be a pacifist pulled into a war like has happened in the past. Putin said back in 2010 he was going to take Ukraine back and people said it was just talk. I could go on and on since I listed to a good 45 minutes of his show today.
I don't like the Ukraine shit, but he has salient points on some aspects and he made me think and care. He did not mention anything about why the US might actually be involved right now, eg Biden's involvement, labs, etc. I don't listen to him much so not sure if he hates the "conspiracy" stuff or not.
Didn't feel like posting my shit content in the full-retard PGOS thread. -
this current clown show of publicly trying to get nukes launched by PutinRaceBannon said:Reagan was smart enough to continue the covert war against the USSR in Afghanistan that Carter actually started. After Carter's weakness emboldened the Soviets to invade
Reagan played both sides against each other in Iran Iraq
Reagan kept the western hemisphere clear from commies with more covert action
Nothing RR did looked like this current clown show of publicly trying to get nukes launched by Putin, by the Euro trash and the Biden trash
Take a Midol, miss. -
Fuck off
-
Mark Levin wanted Donald Trump dead in 2015 then he acted like he was the 2nd coming of Reagan once he learned he was wrong. I'm not saying he's wrong but on this issue I'm with Trump and DeSantis; peace and negotiations over war all day every day.
-
Mark is pretty far right and has compared this to 1930s Europe (though he stopped doing that lately). He's a smart guy but on this he's wrong.
-
Putin is not going to negotiate while you girls are touting a couple of isolationists for POTUS.RoadTrip said:Mark Levin wanted Donald Trump dead in 2015 then he acted like he was the 2nd coming of Reagan once he learned he was wrong. I'm not saying he's wrong but on this issue I'm with Trump and DeSantis; peace and negotiations over war all day every day.
-
Then get your fat dumb ass over there and do something or better yet send your daughters cunt.HHusky said:
Putin is not going to negotiate while you girls are touting a couple of isolationists for POTUS.RoadTrip said:Mark Levin wanted Donald Trump dead in 2015 then he acted like he was the 2nd coming of Reagan once he learned he was wrong. I'm not saying he's wrong but on this issue I'm with Trump and DeSantis; peace and negotiations over war all day every day.
-
Your guy opened the door, just the tip Putin. Yup, gotta keep that Ukraine black book on the Biden's under wraps. You fucking idiot.HHusky said:
Putin is not going to negotiate while you girls are touting a couple of isolationists for POTUS.RoadTrip said:Mark Levin wanted Donald Trump dead in 2015 then he acted like he was the 2nd coming of Reagan once he learned he was wrong. I'm not saying he's wrong but on this issue I'm with Trump and DeSantis; peace and negotiations over war all day every day.
-
The leftist jerkwad is now a Warhawk! Putin likes invading countries when DIMS are in the WH. This idiot can only scream TRUMP!RoadTrip said:
Then get your fat dumb ass over there and do something or better yet send your daughters cunt.HHusky said:
Putin is not going to negotiate while you girls are touting a couple of isolationists for POTUS.RoadTrip said:Mark Levin wanted Donald Trump dead in 2015 then he acted like he was the 2nd coming of Reagan once he learned he was wrong. I'm not saying he's wrong but on this issue I'm with Trump and DeSantis; peace and negotiations over war all day every day.
-
Levin only said that RR would be supplying the fight against Ukraine. That's irrespective of how badly Biden is screwing things up.RaceBannon said:Reagan was smart enough to continue the covert war against the USSR in Afghanistan that Carter actually started. After Carter's weakness emboldened the Soviets to invade
Reagan played both sides against each other in Iran Iraq
Reagan kept the western hemisphere clear from commies with more covert action
Nothing RR did looked like this current clown show of publicly trying to get nukes launched by Putin, by the Euro trash and the Biden trash -
He was taking it pretty far to the 1930's Europe conclusion when I was listening. Invoking Pearl Harbor, etc.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Mark is pretty far right and has compared this to 1930s Europe (though he stopped doing that lately). He's a smart guy but on this he's wrong.
My primary reason for posting this thread is that most of everything I'd ever hear from Levin was pretty conservative, so I found it pretty peculiar that he would be so staunchly in favor of supplying Ukraine with weapons. -
I think he would. I was attempting to illustrate thatBleachedAnusDawg said:
Levin only said that RR would be supplying the fight against Ukraine. That's irrespective of how badly Biden is screwing things up.RaceBannon said:Reagan was smart enough to continue the covert war against the USSR in Afghanistan that Carter actually started. After Carter's weakness emboldened the Soviets to invade
Reagan played both sides against each other in Iran Iraq
Reagan kept the western hemisphere clear from commies with more covert action
Nothing RR did looked like this current clown show of publicly trying to get nukes launched by Putin, by the Euro trash and the Biden trash
HOW is a pretty big deal though -
Maybe he's in on the grift?BleachedAnusDawg said:
He was taking it pretty far to the 1930's Europe conclusion when I was listening. Invoking Pearl Harbor, etc.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Mark is pretty far right and has compared this to 1930s Europe (though he stopped doing that lately). He's a smart guy but on this he's wrong.
My primary reason for posting this thread is that most of everything I'd ever hear from Levin was pretty conservative, so I found it pretty peculiar that he would be so staunchly in favor of supplying Ukraine with weapons.
Everybody's doing it.
