Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Mark Levin on Ukraine

BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,575
Says you can't sit back when you're a leader. Real leaders lead. What would Reagan have done in this situation (I can tell you if you don't know)? Better to arm Ukraine in a proxy fight to weaken Russia than let them roll over Ukraine and knock on Poland's door, next. Don't want to be a pacifist pulled into a war like has happened in the past. Putin said back in 2010 he was going to take Ukraine back and people said it was just talk. I could go on and on since I listed to a good 45 minutes of his show today.

I don't like the Ukraine shit, but he has salient points on some aspects and he made me think and care. He did not mention anything about why the US might actually be involved right now, eg Biden's involvement, labs, etc. I don't listen to him much so not sure if he hates the "conspiracy" stuff or not.

Didn't feel like posting my shit content in the full-retard PGOS thread.

Comments

  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Was he screaming the whole time? I was a listener but grew tired of that personality trait. I’m not surprised he’s all in.

    Maybe for the last 10 years Ukraine should have been arming themselves and building their military to the point that Putin would have thought twice. Maybe follow Reagan’s peace through strength doctrine.

    Instead they were fine with being corrupt and a bank for the corrupt. But they knew the US would jump in and why wouldn’t we since we installed Z.
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,575
    46XiJCAB said:

    Was he screaming the whole time? I was a listener but grew tired of that personality trait. I’m not surprised he’s all in.

    Maybe for the last 10 years Ukraine should have been arming themselves and building their military to the point that Putin would have thought twice. Maybe follow Reagan’s peace through strength doctrine.

    Instead they were fine with being corrupt and a bank for the corrupt. But they knew the US would jump in and why wouldn’t we since we installed Z.

    He was fairly calm, but, yeah, I often tune him out after 5 minutes if he starts ranting and raving. Rattled of several instances where Reagan sent military support to other countries in conflict and that the Ukraine thing is another version of those prior events. FWIW, he is right about what Reagan would have done based on his track record.

    I think his point was that (in his opinion), imperfect as Ukraine is, there's a leadership responsibility to support them while also trying to negotiate peace.
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,625

    46XiJCAB said:

    Was he screaming the whole time? I was a listener but grew tired of that personality trait. I’m not surprised he’s all in.

    Maybe for the last 10 years Ukraine should have been arming themselves and building their military to the point that Putin would have thought twice. Maybe follow Reagan’s peace through strength doctrine.

    Instead they were fine with being corrupt and a bank for the corrupt. But they knew the US would jump in and why wouldn’t we since we installed Z.

    He was fairly calm, but, yeah, I often tune him out after 5 minutes if he starts ranting and raving. Rattled of several instances where Reagan sent military support to other countries in conflict and that the Ukraine thing is another version of those prior events. FWIW, he is right about what Reagan would have done based on his track record.

    I think his point was that (in his opinion), imperfect as Ukraine is, there's a leadership responsibility to support them while also trying to negotiate peace.
    Fine support them... hut negotiate the fucking peace so we don't get dragged into war. With the downing of our drone, that just got closer.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,949
    edited March 2023
    Goduckies said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Was he screaming the whole time? I was a listener but grew tired of that personality trait. I’m not surprised he’s all in.

    Maybe for the last 10 years Ukraine should have been arming themselves and building their military to the point that Putin would have thought twice. Maybe follow Reagan’s peace through strength doctrine.

    Instead they were fine with being corrupt and a bank for the corrupt. But they knew the US would jump in and why wouldn’t we since we installed Z.

    He was fairly calm, but, yeah, I often tune him out after 5 minutes if he starts ranting and raving. Rattled of several instances where Reagan sent military support to other countries in conflict and that the Ukraine thing is another version of those prior events. FWIW, he is right about what Reagan would have done based on his track record.

    I think his point was that (in his opinion), imperfect as Ukraine is, there's a leadership responsibility to support them while also trying to negotiate peace.
    Fine support them... hut negotiate the fucking peace so we don't get dragged into war. With the downing of our drone, that just got closer.
    Were you and the drone close?

    Ts and Ps.
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,625
    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Was he screaming the whole time? I was a listener but grew tired of that personality trait. I’m not surprised he’s all in.

    Maybe for the last 10 years Ukraine should have been arming themselves and building their military to the point that Putin would have thought twice. Maybe follow Reagan’s peace through strength doctrine.

    Instead they were fine with being corrupt and a bank for the corrupt. But they knew the US would jump in and why wouldn’t we since we installed Z.

    He was fairly calm, but, yeah, I often tune him out after 5 minutes if he starts ranting and raving. Rattled of several instances where Reagan sent military support to other countries in conflict and that the Ukraine thing is another version of those prior events. FWIW, he is right about what Reagan would have done based on his track record.

    I think his point was that (in his opinion), imperfect as Ukraine is, there's a leadership responsibility to support them while also trying to negotiate peace.
    Fine support them... hut negotiate the fucking peace so we don't get dragged into war. With the downing of our drone, that just got closer.
    Were you and the drone close?

    Ts and Ps.
    Shut the fuck up
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,051 Founders Club
    Reagan was smart enough to continue the covert war against the USSR in Afghanistan that Carter actually started. After Carter's weakness emboldened the Soviets to invade

    Reagan played both sides against each other in Iran Iraq

    Reagan kept the western hemisphere clear from commies with more covert action

    Nothing RR did looked like this current clown show of publicly trying to get nukes launched by Putin, by the Euro trash and the Biden trash
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,964 Standard Supporter
    46XiJCAB said:

    Was he screaming the whole time? I was a listener but grew tired of that personality trait. I’m not surprised he’s all in.

    Maybe for the last 10 years Ukraine should have been arming themselves and building their military to the point that Putin would have thought twice. Maybe follow Reagan’s peace through strength doctrine.

    Instead they were fine with being corrupt and a bank for the corrupt. But they knew the US would jump in and why wouldn’t we since we installed Z.

    The dims love to go to Ukraine and band those kids, drink their blood etc. While making deposits and withdrawals.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,393 Standard Supporter

    Says you can't sit back when you're a leader. Real leaders lead. What would Reagan have done in this situation (I can tell you if you don't know)? Better to arm Ukraine in a proxy fight to weaken Russia than let them roll over Ukraine and knock on Poland's door, next. Don't want to be a pacifist pulled into a war like has happened in the past. Putin said back in 2010 he was going to take Ukraine back and people said it was just talk. I could go on and on since I listed to a good 45 minutes of his show today.

    I don't like the Ukraine shit, but he has salient points on some aspects and he made me think and care. He did not mention anything about why the US might actually be involved right now, eg Biden's involvement, labs, etc. I don't listen to him much so not sure if he hates the "conspiracy" stuff or not.

    Didn't feel like posting my shit content in the full-retard PGOS thread.

    In 1980 Reagan was dealing with the Soviet Union 1.0 with 5 million men under arms and a still stated intent to bury us. In hindsight, we accomplished nothing in Afghanistan although it did weaken the Soviets but funded Islamic nutcases. The UK and Germany were carrying their weight in NATO and the French had nukes and an effective military. Today, we are dealing with a minor world economic power with nukes and an ineffective military run by a nutcase that isn't a military threat to Europe. If they are, let western Europe take care of the threat to them. Not one more dime until our borders are secured. That is the real and ongoing threat.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,949

    Reagan was smart enough to continue the covert war against the USSR in Afghanistan that Carter actually started. After Carter's weakness emboldened the Soviets to invade

    Reagan played both sides against each other in Iran Iraq

    Reagan kept the western hemisphere clear from commies with more covert action

    Nothing RR did looked like this current clown show of publicly trying to get nukes launched by Putin, by the Euro trash and the Biden trash

    this current clown show of publicly trying to get nukes launched by Putin

    Take a Midol, miss.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,051 Founders Club
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,823 Founders Club
    Mark Levin wanted Donald Trump dead in 2015 then he acted like he was the 2nd coming of Reagan once he learned he was wrong. I'm not saying he's wrong but on this issue I'm with Trump and DeSantis; peace and negotiations over war all day every day.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,952 Founders Club
    Mark is pretty far right and has compared this to 1930s Europe (though he stopped doing that lately). He's a smart guy but on this he's wrong.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,949
    RoadTrip said:

    Mark Levin wanted Donald Trump dead in 2015 then he acted like he was the 2nd coming of Reagan once he learned he was wrong. I'm not saying he's wrong but on this issue I'm with Trump and DeSantis; peace and negotiations over war all day every day.

    Putin is not going to negotiate while you girls are touting a couple of isolationists for POTUS.

  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,823 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Mark Levin wanted Donald Trump dead in 2015 then he acted like he was the 2nd coming of Reagan once he learned he was wrong. I'm not saying he's wrong but on this issue I'm with Trump and DeSantis; peace and negotiations over war all day every day.

    Putin is not going to negotiate while you girls are touting a couple of isolationists for POTUS.

    Then get your fat dumb ass over there and do something or better yet send your daughters cunt.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Mark Levin wanted Donald Trump dead in 2015 then he acted like he was the 2nd coming of Reagan once he learned he was wrong. I'm not saying he's wrong but on this issue I'm with Trump and DeSantis; peace and negotiations over war all day every day.

    Putin is not going to negotiate while you girls are touting a couple of isolationists for POTUS.

    Your guy opened the door, just the tip Putin. Yup, gotta keep that Ukraine black book on the Biden's under wraps. You fucking idiot.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    RoadTrip said:

    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Mark Levin wanted Donald Trump dead in 2015 then he acted like he was the 2nd coming of Reagan once he learned he was wrong. I'm not saying he's wrong but on this issue I'm with Trump and DeSantis; peace and negotiations over war all day every day.

    Putin is not going to negotiate while you girls are touting a couple of isolationists for POTUS.

    Then get your fat dumb ass over there and do something or better yet send your daughters cunt.
    The leftist jerkwad is now a Warhawk! Putin likes invading countries when DIMS are in the WH. This idiot can only scream TRUMP!
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,575

    Reagan was smart enough to continue the covert war against the USSR in Afghanistan that Carter actually started. After Carter's weakness emboldened the Soviets to invade

    Reagan played both sides against each other in Iran Iraq

    Reagan kept the western hemisphere clear from commies with more covert action

    Nothing RR did looked like this current clown show of publicly trying to get nukes launched by Putin, by the Euro trash and the Biden trash

    Levin only said that RR would be supplying the fight against Ukraine. That's irrespective of how badly Biden is screwing things up.
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,575

    Mark is pretty far right and has compared this to 1930s Europe (though he stopped doing that lately). He's a smart guy but on this he's wrong.

    He was taking it pretty far to the 1930's Europe conclusion when I was listening. Invoking Pearl Harbor, etc.

    My primary reason for posting this thread is that most of everything I'd ever hear from Levin was pretty conservative, so I found it pretty peculiar that he would be so staunchly in favor of supplying Ukraine with weapons.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,051 Founders Club

    Reagan was smart enough to continue the covert war against the USSR in Afghanistan that Carter actually started. After Carter's weakness emboldened the Soviets to invade

    Reagan played both sides against each other in Iran Iraq

    Reagan kept the western hemisphere clear from commies with more covert action

    Nothing RR did looked like this current clown show of publicly trying to get nukes launched by Putin, by the Euro trash and the Biden trash

    Levin only said that RR would be supplying the fight against Ukraine. That's irrespective of how badly Biden is screwing things up.
    I think he would. I was attempting to illustrate that

    HOW is a pretty big deal though
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,264 Standard Supporter

    Mark is pretty far right and has compared this to 1930s Europe (though he stopped doing that lately). He's a smart guy but on this he's wrong.

    He was taking it pretty far to the 1930's Europe conclusion when I was listening. Invoking Pearl Harbor, etc.

    My primary reason for posting this thread is that most of everything I'd ever hear from Levin was pretty conservative, so I found it pretty peculiar that he would be so staunchly in favor of supplying Ukraine with weapons.
    Maybe he's in on the grift?

    Everybody's doing it.
Sign In or Register to comment.