You can fool some of the people all of the time
Comments
-
I don't think anyone actually knows.dnc said:
Were we really that close? I thought the consensus was he only played us for a raise and was never really chinterested?WoolleyDoog said:Damn, we were so close to hiring Campbell for a ton of money and sitting here right now at 5-7, with Morris as the returning starter, and trying to doog on the improvement and Campbell needing more time to get his players and system in.
In non-negadoog fairness, I think Campbell actually would have went 6-7 and lost to Haener in the Jimmy Kimmel bowl.
Proof in hand and all that -
FairPostGameOrangeSlices said:
I don't think anyone actually knows.dnc said:
Were we really that close? I thought the consensus was he only played us for a raise and was never really chinterested?WoolleyDoog said:Damn, we were so close to hiring Campbell for a ton of money and sitting here right now at 5-7, with Morris as the returning starter, and trying to doog on the improvement and Campbell needing more time to get his players and system in.
In non-negadoog fairness, I think Campbell actually would have went 6-7 and lost to Haener in the Jimmy Kimmel bowl.
Proof in hand and all that -
Holy shit I was right about @FireCohen and DeBonerMad_Son said:
-
I do remember you being the first one to swinging around his winning percentage as a coach. Dude seems to understand how to winRoadDawg55 said:I wanted DeBoer after he beat UCLA and I looked up his track record. I made a post or three about it.
That faded a bit after a bad loss or two. I liked Aranda better because of the P5 success, but Rhule set him up decently and the jury is still out on him.
I’m happy with DeBoer and think we got it right. He’s a very good coach. -
Not just how to win, but how to win consistently. Suggests his culture and system workFireCohen said:
I do remember you being the first one to swinging around his winning percentage as a coach. Dude seems to understand how to winRoadDawg55 said:I wanted DeBoer after he beat UCLA and I looked up his track record. I made a post or three about it.
That faded a bit after a bad loss or two. I liked Aranda better because of the P5 success, but Rhule set him up decently and the jury is still out on him.
I’m happy with DeBoer and think we got it right. He’s a very good coach. -
as we say "winners WIN"Sources said:
Not just how to win, but how to win consistently. Suggests his culture and system workFireCohen said:
I do remember you being the first one to swinging around his winning percentage as a coach. Dude seems to understand how to winRoadDawg55 said:I wanted DeBoer after he beat UCLA and I looked up his track record. I made a post or three about it.
That faded a bit after a bad loss or two. I liked Aranda better because of the P5 success, but Rhule set him up decently and the jury is still out on him.
I’m happy with DeBoer and think we got it right. He’s a very good coach. -
I was team "anything but a nine-figure boat anchor." I just didn't want to spend that kind of money (and risk basically ending the progrum if it fails) on anybody that isn't guaranteed to succeed, and there are basically three of those guysm on planet earth. And they weren't going to make any of them say no. If every hire is a dice roll, take three cheap rolls of the dice instead of go all in on one.
-
In hindsight DeBoer still feels like it was more risky then Aranda
-
You also fellated Lake.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Are we at the stage of delusion where everyone pretends they wanted DeBoer?
@Gladstone
@RoadDawg55
@RaceBannon
@PGOS
And a few others were first and right
The rest of you?
Not so much -
Aranda does have a 12-2 record to his name, but he now has a 6-7 record, tooCanadawg said:In hindsight DeBoer still feels like it was more risky then Aranda
