Gonna need you to link your big support to KDB. Accountability and shit.
HTH
LOL beating your chest over an "AGREE" post?
If it was so easy to agree, we wouldnt have the vast majority of this board wanting Aranda and Campbell
HTH
So you wanted Stoops, DeBoer as HC with Wilcox as his DC Or nothing.
Hmmm.
I meant DeBoer as HC, who gives a shit about Wilcox. Try reading, you'll see I responded to an early post saying "hire DeBoer"
If that’s what you wanted you could have just “Stoops, DeBoer or bust” but you said this clearly indicating your support for DeBoer was contingent upon one DC coming with him.
You’re the one gatekeeping KDB support in this thread and selecting these extremely weak posts as evidence that you were right while everyone else was wrong.
We're doing this again? I can only beat my chest so many times before it starts to hurt.
Unless I have the timestamps wrong in my mind, @Kingdome_Urinals started the first Deboer thread after they beat UCLA. I was one of the first to post in it, but he started it and I recall that @gladstone himself, also one of the first to be all in, just bumped that thread recently recognizing his firstestness.
Not that it matters. I just typed all that but really, it doesn't matter.
Digging up links and shit sucks on a phone. You guys can find it.
Gonna need you to link your big support to KDB. Accountability and shit.
HTH
LOL beating your chest over an "AGREE" post?
If it was so easy to agree, we wouldnt have the vast majority of this board wanting Aranda and Campbell
HTH
So you wanted Stoops, DeBoer as HC with Wilcox as his DC Or nothing.
Hmmm.
I meant DeBoer as HC, who gives a shit about Wilcox. Try reading, you'll see I responded to an early post saying "hire DeBoer"
If that’s what you wanted you could have just “Stoops, DeBoer or bust” but you said this clearly indicating your support for DeBoer was contingent upon one DC coming with him.
You’re the one gatekeeping KDB support in this thread and selecting these extremely weak posts as evidence that you were right while everyone else was wrong.
I wanted DeBoer after he beat UCLA and I looked up his track record. I made a post or three about it.
That faded a bit after a bad loss or two. I liked Aranda better because of the P5 success, but Rhule set him up decently and the jury is still out on him.
I’m happy with DeBoer and think we got it right. He’s a very good coach.
Damn, we were so close to hiring Campbell for a ton of money and sitting here right now at 5-7, with Morris as the returning starter, and trying to doog on the improvement and Campbell needing more time to get his players and system in.
In non-negadoog fairness, I think Campbell actually would have went 6-7 and lost to Haener in the Jimmy Kimmel bowl.
Damn, we were so close to hiring Campbell for a ton of money and sitting here right now at 5-7, with Morris as the returning starter, and trying to doog on the improvement and Campbell needing more time to get his players and system in.
In non-negadoog fairness, I think Campbell actually would have went 6-7 and lost to Haener in the Jimmy Kimmel bowl.
Were we really that close? I thought the consensus was he only played us for a raise and was never really chinterested?
Damn, we were so close to hiring Campbell for a ton of money and sitting here right now at 5-7, with Morris as the returning starter, and trying to doog on the improvement and Campbell needing more time to get his players and system in.
In non-negadoog fairness, I think Campbell actually would have went 6-7 and lost to Haener in the Jimmy Kimmel bowl.
Were we really that close? I thought the consensus was he only played us for a raise and was never really chinterested?
Damn, we were so close to hiring Campbell for a ton of money and sitting here right now at 5-7, with Morris as the returning starter, and trying to doog on the improvement and Campbell needing more time to get his players and system in.
In non-negadoog fairness, I think Campbell actually would have went 6-7 and lost to Haener in the Jimmy Kimmel bowl.
Were we really that close? I thought the consensus was he only played us for a raise and was never really chinterested?
I wanted DeBoer after he beat UCLA and I looked up his track record. I made a post or three about it.
That faded a bit after a bad loss or two. I liked Aranda better because of the P5 success, but Rhule set him up decently and the jury is still out on him.
I’m happy with DeBoer and think we got it right. He’s a very good coach.
I do remember you being the first one to swinging around his winning percentage as a coach. Dude seems to understand how to win
I wanted DeBoer after he beat UCLA and I looked up his track record. I made a post or three about it.
That faded a bit after a bad loss or two. I liked Aranda better because of the P5 success, but Rhule set him up decently and the jury is still out on him.
I’m happy with DeBoer and think we got it right. He’s a very good coach.
I do remember you being the first one to swinging around his winning percentage as a coach. Dude seems to understand how to win
Not just how to win, but how to win consistently. Suggests his culture and system work
I wanted DeBoer after he beat UCLA and I looked up his track record. I made a post or three about it.
That faded a bit after a bad loss or two. I liked Aranda better because of the P5 success, but Rhule set him up decently and the jury is still out on him.
I’m happy with DeBoer and think we got it right. He’s a very good coach.
I do remember you being the first one to swinging around his winning percentage as a coach. Dude seems to understand how to win
Not just how to win, but how to win consistently. Suggests his culture and system work
I was team "anything but a nine-figure boat anchor." I just didn't want to spend that kind of money (and risk basically ending the progrum if it fails) on anybody that isn't guaranteed to succeed, and there are basically three of those guysm on planet earth. And they weren't going to make any of them say no. If every hire is a dice roll, take three cheap rolls of the dice instead of go all in on one.
Comments
Hmmm.
I meant DeBoer as HC, who gives a shit about Wilcox. Try reading, you'll see I responded to an early post saying "hire DeBoer"
You’re the one gatekeeping KDB support in this thread and selecting these extremely weak posts as evidence that you were right while everyone else was wrong.
Unless I have the timestamps wrong in my mind, @Kingdome_Urinals started the first Deboer thread after they beat UCLA. I was one of the first to post in it, but he started it and I recall that @gladstone himself, also one of the first to be all in, just bumped that thread recently recognizing his firstestness.
Not that it matters. I just typed all that but really, it doesn't matter.
Digging up links and shit sucks on a phone. You guys can find it.
That faded a bit after a bad loss or two. I liked Aranda better because of the P5 success, but Rhule set him up decently and the jury is still out on him.
I’m happy with DeBoer and think we got it right. He’s a very good coach.
In non-negadoog fairness, I think Campbell actually would have went 6-7 and lost to Haener in the Jimmy Kimmel bowl.
Proof in hand and all that